Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H Comparison

Intel Arc G3 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H are both mobile processors built on the Panther Lake architecture, yet they serve distinctly different performance tiers. The Arc G3 is a 14-core, 14-thread part with a 1.90 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost, while the Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread chip clocked at 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. Both share the same 25 W TDP, Intel BGA 2540 socket, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, but the Core Ultra X7 368H carries a higher average benchmark score of 40518 and sits at the 87th percentile across all CPUs, whereas the Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The Core Ultra X7 368H also pairs with the stronger Arc B390 integrated graphics, while the Arc G3 uses the Arc B370.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H wins in every measurable category where benchmark data exists. The database contains 17 benchmark results for the Core Ultra X7 368H, covering Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark workloads, while the Arc G3 has no benchmark entries at all. In synthetic rendering tests, the Core Ultra X7 368H records 28221 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 11852 in Cinebench R20 multicore, and 2844 in Cinebench R15 multicore. Single-core performance is also strong, with 3984 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 1673 in Cinebench R20 single-core, and 401 in Cinebench R15 single-core.

Passmark results for the Core Ultra X7 368H show a broad advantage across math, encryption, and sorting workloads. It scores 105681 in floating-point math, 88083 in integer math, 312927 in data compression, and 25228 in data encryption. The multithread Passmark score is 32956, and the single-thread score is 4005. Extended instruction performance reaches 25669, while random string sorting hits 38093. Physics simulation scores 2857, and prime number finding scores 321.

The Arc G3, by contrast, has zero recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs, but the absence of test results means the data cannot confirm any specific workload win. The Core Ultra X7 368H, with its higher core count, higher clocks, and 87th percentile rank, is the clear performance leader in every benchmark category that has been measured.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Arc G3 boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors use the same socket?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc G3 and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H use the Intel BGA 2540 socket.

Q: What is the difference in core count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H uses the Arc B390 integrated GPU, while the Intel Arc G3 uses the Arc B370.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H supports 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, compared to 136.5 GB/s for the Intel Arc G3.

Q: Is there a difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: No, both processors have 18 MB of shared L3 cache, 192 KB of L1 cache per core, and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison is one-sided because the database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Arc G3. The Core Ultra X7 368H has a full suite of recorded scores, and its average benchmark score of 40518 places it near several close rivals. The Intel Core 7 253PE scores 40557, just 0.1% higher, while the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585, 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, 0.2% lower, and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40426, also 0.2% lower. These narrow margins show the Core Ultra X7 368H sits in a tightly contested performance band.

In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core Ultra X7 368H delivers 28221 points, which is its highest recorded rendering score. Cinebench R20 multicore drops to 11852, and Cinebench R15 multicore records 2844. The single-core progression is similarly scaled: 3984 in R23, 1673 in R20, and 401 in R15. Passmark multithread performance is 32956, while Passmark single-thread performance is 4005, with the duplicate single-thread entry also recording 4005.

The largest Passmark deltas appear in data compression and floating-point math. Data compression scores 312927, almost three times the integer math score of 88083. Floating-point math scores 105681, which exceeds integer math by roughly 20%. Extended instructions score 25669, and data encryption scores 25228, placing them close together. Random string sorting scores 38093, physics scores 2857, and prime number finding scores 321, the lowest recorded value in the suite.

Because the Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, there are no direct percentage advantages to calculate between the two. The data shows that the Core Ultra X7 368H is the only one of the two with measured performance, and it holds a substantial lead in every category by default. The 87th percentile ranking for the Core Ultra X7 368H versus the 50th percentile for the Arc G3 reinforces the performance gap, though the Arc G3 percentile is based on its classification rather than tested results.

Specification Differences

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and Intel Arc G3 differ in several core specifications. The Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks differ slightly: 2.00 GHz for the Core Ultra X7 368H versus 1.90 GHz for the Arc G3. Boost clocks show a larger gap, with 5.00 GHz for the Core Ultra X7 368H versus 4.60 GHz for the Arc G3.

Memory bandwidth also differs. The Core Ultra X7 368H supports 153.6 GB/s, while the Arc G3 supports 136.5 GB/s. Both use LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus. The integrated graphics differ as well, with the Core Ultra X7 368H using the Arc B390 and the Arc G3 using the Arc B370. The Core Ultra X7 368H belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 and the Ultra X7 generation with the Panther Lake-H designation, while the Arc G3 is listed under the Arc G3 generation with a Panther Lake designation.

Release dates differ by several months. The Core Ultra X7 368H was released on January 4, 2026, while the Arc G3 was released on May 27, 2026. The part numbers also differ: SA4R7Q9EJ for the Core Ultra X7 368H and SA4QZ for the Arc G3. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are marked as active in production status. The Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40518 and a percentile rank of 87, while the Arc G3 has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the Panther Lake architecture and share the same 3 nm process node from Intel. The codename for both is Panther Lake, though the Core Ultra X7 368H is further specified as Panther Lake-H, indicating a high-performance mobile variant. The Arc G3 is simply listed as Panther Lake.

Cache hierarchies are identical on paper. Both have 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither supports ECC memory, and both use PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU-only connectivity. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, and both target the mobile market segment.

The architectural differences that matter are the core count, clock speeds, and integrated graphics. The Core Ultra X7 368H adds two more cores and two more threads compared to the Arc G3, which directly contributes to its higher multicore performance. The boost clock advantage of 400 MHz (5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz) supports stronger single-thread performance. The memory bandwidth gap of 17.1 GB/s (153.6 GB/s versus 136.5 GB/s) gives the Core Ultra X7 368H more headroom for memory-intensive workloads. The integrated GPU difference, Arc B390 versus Arc B370, suggests a higher graphics capability tier for the Core Ultra X7 368H, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded in the database. The Core Ultra X7 368H also carries the Core Ultra Series 3 family designation, while the Arc G3 does not have a series designation listed.