Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX Comparison

Intel Arc G3 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX are both mobile processors from Intel, but they are positioned very differently. The Core Ultra 9 285HX is a high-end part with a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Arc G3 sits at the 50th percentile. The data shows the Core Ultra 9 285HX is the clear performance leader across the board, but the Arc G3 has its own role in the lineup based on its efficiency and integration.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, but no recorded scores for the Intel Arc G3. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible across the tested workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285HX delivers an average benchmark score of 76155, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with an average score of 76212, which is 0.1% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with an average score of 75779, which is 0.5% lower.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX shows consistent strength in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36429.5 in multi-core and 2187.5 in single-core. The single-core result represents a strong showing, but the multi-core result is the standout figure. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 20236, and the single-core score is 2856. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 5656.5 in multi-core and 323.5 in single-core.

PassMark results for the Core Ultra 9 285HX reinforce this pattern. The multi-thread score is 56902, while the single-thread score is 4618. Data compression reaches 631885, and data encryption hits 48567. Floating point math scores 194998, and integer math scores 155076. The extended instructions test produces 49148, and physics simulation scores 3476. Random string sorting completes at 77196, and the find prime numbers test yields 460.

Because the Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, its wins count is zero, and the Core Ultra 9 285HX also has zero wins in the head-to-head data. This absence of data is informative: the Arc G3 is a newly released processor with a production status of active, but its performance profile has not yet been measured in the database. The Core Ultra 9 285HX, in contrast, has a full set of results that establish it as a top-tier mobile processor.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX rank among all CPUs?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285HX sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 76155.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Arc G3 has an empty benchmark list and an average score of 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, but this is based on the absence of measured results.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the difference in their boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX boosts up to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Arc G3 boosts up to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Are both processors designed for mobile devices?

A: Yes, both are listed in the mobile market segment and are currently in active production.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Arc G3 has 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is the superior processor for raw performance. Its 24 cores, 24 threads, and 5.50 GHz boost clock deliver benchmark results that place it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 76155 is close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX just 0.1% ahead and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D 0.5% behind. This puts the Core Ultra 9 285HX in a tight competitive group at the top of the mobile processor market.

The Intel Arc G3, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be evaluated in the same way. Its 14 cores and 14 threads suggest a lower performance ceiling, and its 4.60 GHz boost clock is lower than the Core Ultra 9 285HX. The Arc G3 also has a lower TDP of 25 watts, compared to 55 watts for the Core Ultra 9 285HX, which indicates a focus on efficiency rather than maximum throughput.

For users who need heavy multi-threaded workloads, the Core Ultra 9 285HX is the only choice with measured data to support it. The Arc G3 may serve a different purpose, but the database contains no evidence of its performance capabilities. The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the Core Ultra 9 285HX wins on every available performance metric.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX uses the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup, while the Intel Arc G3 is simply listed as Arc G3. The Core Ultra 9 285HX has 24 cores and 24 threads, while the Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.80 GHz for the Core Ultra 9 285HX and 1.90 GHz for the Arc G3. Boost clocks are 5.50 GHz and 4.60 GHz, respectively.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX has a TDP of 55 watts, while the Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts. The socket differs: the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Intel BGA 2114, and the Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540. The Core Ultra 9 285HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the Arc G3 does not. Part numbers are SRVFJ for the Core Ultra 9 285HX and SA4QZ for the Arc G3.

Memory support also differs. The Core Ultra 9 285HX supports DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, while the Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Core Ultra 9 285HX supports ECC memory, while the Arc G3 does not. PCIe lane counts are 20 for the Core Ultra 9 285HX and 4 for the Arc G3, both Gen 5. The release dates differ, with the Core Ultra 9 285HX launching earlier and the Arc G3 later.

Architecture Differences

The architecture of the two processors reflects different design goals. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is built on the Arrow Lake architecture with the codename Arrow Lake-HX, while the Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename. Both use a 3 nm process node, but the foundry differs: the Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by TSMC, while the Arc G3 is manufactured by Intel.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX has a transistor count of 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm². The Arc G3 does not have recorded transistor or die size data. Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3: the Core Ultra 9 285HX has 3 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3, while the Arc G3 has 2.5 MB of L2 per core and 18 MB of shared L3. Both have 192 KB of L1 per core.

The integrated graphics differ significantly. The Core Ultra 9 285HX includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, while the Arc G3 includes Arc B370. The naming suggests a different graphics architecture, but the database does not provide further details on their capabilities.

The Core Ultra 9 285HX is part of the Ultra 9 generation, specifically Arrow Lake-HX, while the Arc G3 is part of the Arc G3 generation, specifically Panther Lake. The Arc G3 is a newer release, but this does not translate into measured performance advantages in the database.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX wins in every benchmark category where results exist. Its Cinebench scores, PassMark scores, and overall average benchmark score all indicate a high-performance mobile processor. The 24-core configuration and 5.50 GHz boost clock make it suitable for demanding multi-threaded tasks like video rendering, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking. The nearest rival comparisons show it is competitive with top AMD processors, trailing the Ryzen 9 8945HX by only 0.1% and leading the Ryzen 9 9950X3D by 0.5%.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark data, so it cannot claim a win in any tested workload. However, its specifications suggest certain advantages. The lower TDP of 25 watts, compared to 55 watts, indicates a focus on power efficiency, which could be beneficial in thin-and-light laptops or fanless designs. The higher memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, compared to 102.4 GB/s for the Core Ultra 9 285HX, may help in memory-intensive tasks, though this is not confirmed by benchmark results.

The integrated graphics differences are notable. The Arc G3 uses Arc B370 graphics, while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Without benchmark data, the relative graphics performance cannot be assessed, but the newer Panther Lake platform for the Arc G3 may offer architectural improvements.

For workloads that rely on measured performance, the Core Ultra 9 285HX is the clear winner. For scenarios that prioritize efficiency and lower power draw, the Arc G3 may have a role, but the database does not contain evidence to support a performance claim. The Core Ultra 9 285HX is the only processor in this comparison with verified results, and those results place it among the top mobile CPUs available.