Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc G3 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has a wins count recorded. However, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has a substantial set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries in the database.

For the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, the recorded data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 9932 and a single-core score of 1758. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 6491 and single-core is 916. The Cinebench R15 scores are 1502.5 for multi-core and 267 for single-core. These results demonstrate a consistent scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions, with the multi-core scores growing proportionally as the workload complexity increases.

The PassMark suite for the Ultra 5 228V delivers a multi-thread score of 18227 and a single-thread score of 3836. The integer math test records 39679, while floating-point math reaches 53310. Data compression scores 173924, data encryption records 13032, and extended instructions (SIMD) posts 14801. The physics test shows 1538, random string sorting scores 21254, and prime number finding records 168. The average benchmark score for the Ultra 5 228V is 21440, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The Arc G3 has no benchmark data recorded, so no direct comparison between the two processors is possible from the database. The Arc G3 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0. This indicates that the Arc G3 either has not been tested yet or its results have not been entered into the database.

The nearest rivals for the Ultra 5 228V provide context for its performance level. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 scores 21484, which is 0.2% higher than the Ultra 5 228V. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, putting the Ultra 5 228V 0.3% ahead. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.9% higher than the Ultra 5 228V. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, placing the Ultra 5 228V 1.0% ahead. These tight margins indicate that the Ultra 5 228V performs in a narrow band around these four established processors.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 and Intel Core Ultra 5 228V differ substantially in their underlying designs. The Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake platform with a codename of Panther Lake, while the Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake architecture with the codename Lunar Lake. The Arc G3 belongs to the Arc G3 generation, while the Ultra 5 228V belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 and the Ultra 5 (Lunar Lake) generation.

Core counts differ significantly. The Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, indicating a design without simultaneous multithreading. The Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores and 8 threads, also without hyperthreading. The Arc G3 provides 75% more cores than the Ultra 5 228V. Clock speeds are close: the Arc G3 has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Ultra 5 228V has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Ultra 5 228V has a 10.5% higher base clock, while the Arc G3 has a 2.2% higher boost clock.

Power envelopes differ as well. The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts, while the Ultra 5 228V has a TDP of 17 watts. This makes the Ultra 5 228V more power-efficient on paper, consuming 32% less power. Both processors use a 3 nm process node, but the foundry differs: Intel fabricates the Arc G3, while TSMC fabricates the Ultra 5 228V.

Cache hierarchies share some similarities but differ in total capacity. Both processors have 192 KB of L1 cache per core and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache differs considerably: the Arc G3 has 18 MB shared L3 cache, while the Ultra 5 228V has 8 MB shared L3 cache. The Arc G3 provides 125% more L3 cache than the Ultra 5 228V.

Memory support differs. The Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Ultra 5 228V has memory support listed as unknown, depending on the motherboard, with dual-channel configuration and no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The Arc G3 has a specified memory bandwidth, which the Ultra 5 228V lacks in the database.

Both processors use PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU only. Neither supports ECC memory. Both have integrated graphics: the Arc G3 includes Arc B370 graphics, while the Ultra 5 228V includes Arc 130V graphics. The Arc G3 uses an Intel BGA 2540 socket, while the Ultra 5 228V uses an Intel BGA 2833 socket. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Arc G3 has a part number of SA4QZ, while the Ultra 5 228V has part numbers SRPMV and SRPMU.

Release dates differ by about 20 months. The Ultra 5 228V was released on 2024-09-23, while the Arc G3 was released on 2026-05-27. Both processors are marked as Active in production status and target the mobile market segment.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark data, the wins must be inferred from the architectural specifications and the available benchmark results for the Ultra 5 228V.

The Intel Arc G3 wins on core count, providing 14 cores versus 8 cores for the Ultra 5 228V. This 75% core advantage suggests that the Arc G3 would perform better in heavily parallel workloads that scale with core count, such as multi-threaded rendering, compilation, or scientific computing. However, no benchmark scores exist in the database to confirm this expectation.

The Arc G3 also wins on L3 cache capacity, with 18 MB versus 8 MB for the Ultra 5 228V. This larger cache could improve performance in workloads with large working sets that benefit from cache reuse. The Arc G3 also has a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz for the Ultra 5 228V.

The Arc G3 has a higher TDP of 25 watts versus 17 watts for the Ultra 5 228V. This allows the Arc G3 to sustain higher power draw, which may enable better sustained performance under load, but it also means the Arc G3 produces more heat and requires more cooling.

The Ultra 5 228V wins on base clock, with 2.10 GHz versus 1.90 GHz for the Arc G3. This gives the Ultra 5 228V a 10.5% higher base clock, which could improve performance in lightly threaded tasks that rely on base frequency.

The Ultra 5 228V wins on power efficiency, with a 17 watt TDP versus 25 watts for the Arc G3. This makes it more suitable for thin-and-light laptops or fanless designs where power consumption is a primary constraint.

The Ultra 5 228V also has recorded benchmark data, placing it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. The Arc G3 sits at the 50th percentile with no benchmark scores, meaning its actual performance position is unverified in the database.

The Ultra 5 228V has a 20-month earlier release date, which may indicate a more mature platform with established driver support and software optimizations.

The Verdict

The data presents an incomplete picture for a definitive verdict. The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has a comprehensive benchmark suite. The Arc G3's architectural specifications suggest it could deliver higher multi-threaded performance due to its 14 cores and larger 18 MB L3 cache. The Ultra 5 228V's recorded scores demonstrate solid performance in the 75th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 21440.

For workloads that depend on core count and cache capacity, the Arc G3 shows theoretical advantages. Its 14 cores versus 8 cores and 18 MB versus 8 MB L3 cache would likely benefit multi-threaded tasks. The higher 25 watt TDP allows more sustained power delivery, which can support longer periods of heavy computation.

For workloads that depend on power efficiency and base clock speed, the Ultra 5 228V shows advantages. Its 17 watt TDP makes it more suitable for battery-powered devices, and its 2.10 GHz base clock provides a higher floor for single-threaded performance. The recorded benchmark scores confirm that the Ultra 5 228V performs competitively against established processors, with margins within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600, Intel Core i9-11900H, Intel Xeon D-1746TER, and AMD EPYC 9454.

The Arc G3's newer release date of 2026-05-27 suggests it is a more recent design, potentially incorporating newer technologies. The Ultra 5 228V's 2024-09-23 release date means it has been in the market longer, with more time for software optimization.

The choice between these processors depends on the user's priorities. The Arc G3 targets users who need more cores and cache, accepting higher power consumption. The Ultra 5 228V targets users who need efficiency and verified performance, accepting fewer cores and less cache. The absence of benchmark data for the Arc G3 means its real-world performance remains unquantified in the database.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has 8 cores and 8 threads. Neither processor uses simultaneous multithreading.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity for each processor?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 18 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Arc G3 provides 125% more L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, which is 2.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has a TDP of 17 watts. The Ultra 5 228V consumes 32% less power.

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: Only the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is 21440, placing it at the 75th percentile. The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries and sits at the 50th percentile with a score of 0.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The Intel Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has memory support listed as unknown, depending on the motherboard, with no recorded bandwidth figure.