Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core 5 210H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc G3 versus the Intel Core 5 210H. This means the comparison must rely on the recorded data for the Core 5 210H and the architectural specifications of the Arc G3, as the Arc G3 currently has no benchmark scores in the database. The Core 5 210H has a substantial body of measured results, with an average benchmark score of 24,872 and a percentile ranking of 77 among all CPUs.

For the Core 5 210H, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,830 points positions it firmly in the mid-range mobile performance tier. Its single-core R23 result of 1,771 points shows strong per-thread capability. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score comes in at 6,504, while the single-core score is 918. The older R15 test shows a multicore score of 1,757 and a single-core score of 247. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both threaded workloads and single-threaded tasks with competence.

The Passmark suite provides additional clarity. The multithread score of 18,252 and the single-thread score of 3,539 confirm the dual nature of the Core 5 210H. Integer math scores 61,503, while floating point math reaches 45,057. Extended instructions score 13,370. Data compression hits 217,805, and data encryption reaches 12,187. Random string sorting finishes at 23,451. Physics simulation scores 1,040, and the find prime numbers test returns 53. These are the only recorded performance data points available for either processor.

Because the Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, the database cannot show direct wins for either side. The Core 5 210H has all the measured data, while the Arc G3 presents a specification-based profile only. The nearest rivals for the Core 5 210H offer context. The Intel Core i7-13620H averages 24,911 points, a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the Core 5 210H. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24,822, a delta of 0.2 percent. The Intel Core i7-11850H records 24,935, a delta of -0.3 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F reaches 24,964, a delta of -0.4 percent. These rival deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Core 5 210H sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Where Each One Wins

The Core 5 210H wins in every measured category because it is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark scores. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11,830 suggests strong sustained performance for rendering and compilation tasks. The R23 single-core score of 1,771 indicates responsive day-to-day operations and light single-threaded workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 18,252 reinforces the multicore strength, while the single-thread score of 3,539 shows that the processor does not sacrifice single-core speed for core count.

The Arc G3, by contrast, has no benchmark data. Its specifications suggest a different design philosophy. With 14 cores and 14 threads, the Arc G3 matches its thread count to its core count, meaning there is no hyper-threading or simultaneous multithreading. The Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, which implies a hybrid arrangement with performance cores and efficiency cores, a common approach in Raptor Lake designs. The Arc G3 uses a Panther Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, while the Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process. These process differences imply power and efficiency characteristics, but without benchmark scores, the performance outcome is not measurable.

Use-case analysis from the recorded data favors the Core 5 210H in every scenario where benchmarks exist. Data compression and encryption tasks, measured at 217,805 and 12,187 respectively, benefit from the processor's thread configuration. Integer and floating point math, scoring 61,503 and 45,057, cover scientific and financial workloads. The physics score of 1,040 addresses simulation tasks. For the Arc G3, the absence of benchmarks means the database cannot assign wins to it in any workload category. The only conclusion available from the data is that the Core 5 210H has a complete performance profile, whereas the Arc G3 remains unmeasured.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 210H is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance, and it should be selected when measured results matter. Its percentile ranking of 77 places it above the majority of CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within a 0.4 percent delta, confirm that it competes effectively with established processors such as the Intel Core i7-13620H, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, the Intel Core i7-11850H, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. For workloads that require known performance, the Core 5 210H delivers a full set of Cinebench and Passmark scores.

The Intel Arc G3 presents a specification-based alternative. Its 14 cores and 14 threads exceed the Core 5 210H in core count, and its 3 nm process node is more advanced than the 10 nm node of the Core 5 210H. The L3 cache of 18 MB shared across the Arc G3 is larger than the 12 MB shared L3 on the Core 5 210H. The Arc G3 also supports LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the Core 5 210H supports DDR4 and DDR5 without a recorded bandwidth figure. However, the absence of benchmark scores for the Arc G3 means no performance claims can be made from the database. Users who require proven performance should choose the Core 5 210H. Users who prioritize the architectural advantages of Panther Lake and the 3 nm process, and who are willing to accept the lack of measured data, might consider the Arc G3, but the database provides no evidence to support such a choice.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 210H?

A: The Core 5 210H has an average benchmark score of 24,872, with a percentile ranking of 77 among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark scores. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no benchmark entries.

Q: How does the Core 5 210H compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core 5 210H averages 24,872 points. The Intel Core i7-13620H is 0.2 percent lower, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX is 0.2 percent higher, the Intel Core i7-11850H is 0.3 percent lower, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is 0.4 percent lower.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. The Core 5 210H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, but no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Intel Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process node. The Intel Core 5 210H uses a 10 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc G3 is built on the Panther Lake architecture, while the Intel Core 5 210H uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant. The Arc G3 belongs to the Arc G3 generation, and the Core 5 210H is part of the Core 5 generation under the Raptor Lake Refresh codename. This architectural split creates fundamental differences in core design and efficiency.

The Arc G3 features 14 cores and 14 threads, indicating a design without simultaneous multithreading. The Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, suggesting a hybrid architecture with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, a characteristic of Raptor Lake designs. The Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process node, while the Core 5 210H uses a 10 nm node. Both are fabricated by Intel, but the process difference implies that the Arc G3 can achieve higher transistor density and potentially lower power consumption per operation, though no measured data confirms this.

Cache configurations differ notably. The Arc G3 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 5 210H has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The larger caches on the Arc G3 could benefit workloads that exhibit high data reuse, but again, no benchmark data exists to quantify this.

Integrated graphics also diverge. The Arc G3 includes an Arc B370 integrated GPU, while the Core 5 210H includes Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units. This difference suggests that the Arc G3 targets more demanding integrated graphics workloads, though no graphics benchmarks are present in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specification fields. The Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the Core 5 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads. Base clock speeds are 1.90 GHz for the Arc G3 and 2.20 GHz for the Core 5 210H. Boost clock speeds are 4.60 GHz for the Arc G3 and 4.80 GHz for the Core 5 210H. The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts, while the Core 5 210H has a TDP of 45 watts.

The sockets differ: the Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540, and the Core 5 210H uses Intel BGA 1744. The process node is 3 nm for the Arc G3 and 10 nm for the Core 5 210H. Memory support differs, with the Arc G3 supporting LPDDR5X and the Core 5 210H supporting DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded as 136.5 GB/s for the Arc G3, while no bandwidth figure exists for the Core 5 210H.

PCIe support differs in lane count. The Arc G3 provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes, while the Core 5 210H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes. Integrated graphics are Arc B370 for the Arc G3 and Iris Xe Graphics 48EU for the Core 5 210H. The release dates differ, with the Core 5 210H released on December 17, 2024, and the Arc G3 released on May 27, 2026. The Core 5 210H has a launch MSRP of $342, while the Arc G3 has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core 5 210H has a part number of SRQ6RQ5MN, and the Arc G3 has a part number of SA4QZ. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both target the mobile market segment. Both are currently active in production, and neither supports ECC memory.