Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a complete benchmark suite for the Intel Core 3 304, while the Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries in the current dataset. This asymmetry shapes the entire comparison. The Core 3 304 delivers an average benchmark score of 13,745 and sits at the 68th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Arc G3, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile ranking and an average score of 0, indicating that no measured performance data has been captured for it yet.

The Core 3 304 shows strong multi-threaded results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 5,263 points, while the single-core score lands at 1,765. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 4,160 and the single-core result is 587. The older Cinebench R15 test yields 849 multi-core and 264 single-core. These scores place the Core 3 304 within a narrow performance band relative to its nearest rivals. The database lists the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX with an average score of 13,786, which is only 0.3% higher than the Core 3 304. The Intel Core i7-8750H scores 13,868, a 0.9% advantage. The AMD EPYC 7443 reaches 13,936, which is 1.4% ahead. The only rival that falls behind is the Intel Core 5 120UL at 13,594, a 1.1% deficit for the Core 3 304.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded profile. The data compression test produces 114,775 points, while data encryption scores 8,501. Extended instructions yield 9,686, and the find prime numbers test returns a modest 68. Floating point math reaches 29,722, integer math scores 24,640, and multithread performance hits 11,625. The physics test delivers 868, random string sorting reaches 13,659, and single-thread performance is measured at 3,614 in both PassMark single-thread variants.

Since the Arc G3 lacks recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison cannot show direct wins for either part in specific tests. The database instead indicates that the Arc G3 has zero wins and the Core 3 304 has zero wins, reflecting the absence of paired benchmark data. What the data does show is that the Core 3 304 consistently outperforms its nearest rivals by a slim margin in some cases and trails them by less than 1.5% in others. This narrow spread suggests that the Core 3 304 is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel lineups and use different codenames. The Arc G3 belongs to the Panther Lake generation, while the Core 3 304 is based on Wildcat Lake. Both are manufactured on a 3 nm process node at Intel, but the similarities end there.

Core counts differ substantially. The Arc G3 packs 14 cores and 14 threads, while the Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads. Neither part supports Hyper-Threading, as thread counts match core counts exactly. Clock speeds also diverge: the Arc G3 has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, whereas the Core 3 304 runs at 1.50 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost. The Arc G3 therefore holds a 0.40 GHz base clock advantage and a 0.30 GHz boost clock advantage.

Cache hierarchies reveal a significant gap. The Arc G3 provides 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 304 offers 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and only 6 MB of shared L3. The Arc G3 has triple the L3 capacity, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access large working sets. The per-core L1 and L2 figures are identical, but the total cache footprint favors the Arc G3 by a wide margin.

Memory support and bandwidth also separate the two. The Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 136.5 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Core 3 304 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but operates on a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 more than doubles the memory bandwidth of the Core 3 304, which can be decisive for memory-intensive tasks such as large data processing or integrated graphics workloads. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The Arc G3 uses PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes available to the CPU, while the Core 3 304 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The Arc G3 offers a newer PCIe generation, but fewer lanes. The Core 3 304 provides more lanes at an older generation. Integrated graphics also differ: the Arc G3 includes Arc B370 graphics, while the Core 3 304 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core.

Thermal design power separates the two clearly. The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts, while the Core 3 304 draws only 15 watts. Both are mobile parts, but the Core 3 304 targets lower power envelopes. The sockets also differ: the Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540, and the Core 3 304 uses Intel BGA 1516. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The available benchmark data shows the Core 3 304 as the measured performer. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5,263 and single-core score of 1,765 establish a baseline for mobile computing tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 24,640 and floating point math score of 29,722 indicate solid general-purpose arithmetic capability. Data compression at 114,775 points is the strongest single result in the suite, suggesting that the Core 3 304 handles compression workloads particularly well relative to its other measurements.

The Arc G3 wins on paper specifications, even without benchmark data. Its 14 cores and 14 threads double the core count of most mainstream mobile processors, and the 4.60 GHz boost clock gives it a clock-speed advantage. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 136.5 GB/s of memory bandwidth point to strong performance in workloads that scale with cache capacity and memory throughput. The dual-channel memory bus is a clear advantage over the single-channel configuration of the Core 3 304.

For the Core 3 304, the nearest rival comparisons show where it sits in the broader market. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, a high-end desktop processor, scores only 0.3% higher on average. The Intel Core i7-8750H, a mobile part from an earlier generation, scores 0.9% higher. The AMD EPYC 7443, a server processor, scores 1.4% higher. The Intel Core 5 120UL is the only rival that the Core 3 304 beats, and only by 1.1%. These margins are small enough that workload-specific behavior could flip the ranking in either direction.

The TDP difference matters for sustained workloads. The Core 3 304 at 15 watts will generate less heat and may sustain boost clocks longer in thermally constrained chassis. The Arc G3 at 25 watts has more thermal headroom for performance, but requires more cooling. In thin-and-light laptops, the Core 3 304 is likely to maintain consistent performance without thermal throttling. In larger notebooks with better cooling, the Arc G3 can use its extra cores and bandwidth to pull ahead.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between the two processors. The Intel Core 3 304 is the only part with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it at the 68th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 13,745. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1.4% band, indicating that the Core 3 304 delivers performance comparable to much larger and more expensive processors. The 15 watt TDP makes it suitable for power-sensitive mobile designs, and the single-channel memory bus is a limiting factor for memory-heavy workloads.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark data in the database, so its performance cannot be quantified. However, its specifications position it for higher throughput. The 14 cores, 18 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel LPDDR5X memory at 136.5 GB/s, and 4.60 GHz boost clock all point to a processor built for parallel workloads. The 25 watt TDP and PCIe Gen 5 support suggest a more capable platform overall.

A user who needs verified performance today should select the Core 3 304. The benchmark data confirms its standing relative to known rivals, and the narrow margins against much higher-tier processors indicate efficient design. A user who prioritizes raw specifications and is willing to wait for benchmark data should consider the Arc G3. Its core count, cache size, and memory bandwidth are all significantly higher than the Core 3 304. The 50th percentile ranking for the Arc G3, however, suggests that the database currently has no evidence of its actual performance level.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Arc G3 delivers 136.5 GB/s over a dual-channel LPDDR5X bus. The Core 3 304 delivers 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus that supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How does the Core 3 304 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 13,745 is 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, 0.9% below the Intel Core i7-8750H, 1.4% below the AMD EPYC 7443, and 1.1% above the Intel Core 5 120UL.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts, and the Core 3 304 has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics do they use?

A: The Arc G3 uses Arc B370 graphics, while the Core 3 304 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, neither the Arc G3 nor the Core 3 304 supports ECC memory.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc G3 | Intel Core 3 304 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 14 | 5 |

| Threads | 14 | 5 |

| Base clock | 1.90 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 25 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 2540 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Panther Lake | Wildcat Lake |

| Generation | Arc G3 (Panther Lake) | Core 3 (Wildcat Lake) |

| L3 cache | 18 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | LPDDR5X | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 136.5 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 4 lanes | Gen 4, 6 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Arc B370 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Release date | 2026-05-27 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $309 |

| Part number | SA4QZ | SAE3K |