Intel Arc G3 vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc G3 and the Intel Core 3 201E. The Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, while the Core 3 201E carries a full suite of Cinebench and Passmark scores. This makes a direct comparison impossible from measured data alone.

What the data does show is that the Core 3 201E sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19,056. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19,047 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19,039 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982 (0.4% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18,979 (0.4% ahead). These deltas are tiny, meaning the Core 3 201E performs essentially on par with those four parts in aggregate scoring.

The Core 3 201E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,613 and a single-core score of 1,780. In R20, it scores 5,297 multi-core and 747 single-core. In R15, it reaches 1,271 multi-core and 179 single-core. Passmark results include 14,839 in multithread, 3,482 in single-thread, 43,894 in integer math, 33,260 in floating-point math, and 16,416 in data compression. Encryption work scores 8,931, extended instructions score 11,035, random string sorting scores 17,783, and physics scores 1,141. Prime number finding is notably low at 57.

The Arc G3 has no recorded scores in any of these tests. Its percentile rank is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0, reflecting the absence of measurements. The nearest rivals list for the Arc G3 is empty, so there is no comparative data to anchor its expected performance either.

The Verdict

The data supports only one conclusion for measured performance: the Intel Core 3 201E is the only part here with verified benchmark results. With a 73rd percentile standing among all CPUs and an average score of 19,056, it is a functional mid-tier desktop processor. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.4% of its aggregate score, confirm that it trades blows with mainstream AMD and Intel parts.

The Intel Arc G3, by contrast, has no benchmark data recorded. Its 50th percentile rank is a placeholder, not a measured result. The average score of 0 emphasizes that no performance information exists in the database for this chip. Anyone relying on the database for a purchasing decision can only act on the Core 3 201E's numbers; the Arc G3 remains an unknown quantity.

For builders selecting between these two, the Core 3 201E is the only option with evidence of capability. The Arc G3 cannot be recommended from recorded data because no data exists. That is not a judgment on its potential, it is a statement about what the measurements show.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Arc G3 has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank that reflects missing data rather than measured performance.

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 201E's average benchmark score?

A: The Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19,056, placing it at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: How does the Core 3 201E compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19,047 (0% delta), the Intel Core i5-12400F scores 19,039 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-1335U scores 18,982 (0.4% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 18,979 (0.4% delta). All four are within 0.4% of the Core 3 201E.

Q: What is the Core 3 201E's best single-thread score?

A: In Passmark single-thread, the Core 3 201E scores 3,482. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1,780.

Q: What is the Core 3 201E's multi-core performance?

A: The Core 3 201E scores 14,839 in Passmark multithread, 12,613 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 5,297 in R20 multi-core, and 1,271 in R15 multi-core.

Q: Does the Core 3 201E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 3 201E has ECC memory support enabled.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every hardware field recorded.

Cores and threads: The Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Clock speeds: The Arc G3 has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Core 3 201E has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Thermal design power: The Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 watts. The Core 3 201E has a TDP of 60 watts.

Socket: The Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540. The Core 3 201E uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: The Arc G3 is built on a 3 nm process. The Core 3 201E is built on a 10 nm process. The Core 3 201E also has a recorded die size of 163 mm², while the Arc G3 has no die size data.

Cache layout: The Arc G3 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 201E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support: The Arc G3 supports LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. The Core 3 201E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The Arc G3 does not support ECC memory; the Core 3 201E does.

PCIe: The Arc G3 provides Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The Core 3 201E provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics: The Arc G3 includes Arc B370 graphics. The Core 3 201E includes UHD Graphics 730.

Market segment and release date: The Arc G3 is a mobile part released on 2026-05-27. The Core 3 201E is a desktop part released on 2025-01-12. The Core 3 201E has a launch MSRP of $134; the Arc G3 has no recorded launch MSRP.

Production status and part numbers: Both are listed as Active. The Arc G3 has part number SA4QZ, the Core 3 201E has part number SRVTR. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different Intel families and target different platforms.

The Arc G3 belongs to the Panther Lake generation, fabricated on a 3 nm node at Intel's own foundry. It uses a 14-core, 14-thread configuration with no hyper-threading, which the thread count matching the core count confirms. The cache hierarchy is generous: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The memory interface is LPDDR5X-only, dual-channel, delivering 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. The integrated graphics solution is the Arc B370, a notable inclusion for a mobile chip. The PCIe connectivity is limited to Gen 5 with 4 lanes, which suits a low-power mobile design. Its 25-watt TDP and BGA 2540 socket reinforce that positioning.

The Core 3 201E comes from the Bartlett Lake generation, built on a 10 nm process. It uses a 4-core, 8-thread setup with hyper-threading enabled, doubling the thread count over the physical cores. The cache is smaller per core: 80 KB of L1, 1.25 MB of L2, and 12 MB of shared L3. Memory support is broader with both DDR4 and DDR5, though bandwidth is lower at 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, a feature the Arc G3 lacks. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730, a more modest iGPU than the Arc B370. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, four times the lane count of the Arc G3. The 60-watt TDP and Socket 1700 indicate a desktop processor with more headroom for sustained loads. The die size is recorded at 163 mm², a figure not available for the Arc G3.

The architectural split is clear: the Arc G3 is a high-core-count, low-power mobile chip with fast memory and a strong iGPU, while the Core 3 201E is a lower-core-count desktop chip with flexible memory support, ECC, and more PCIe lanes.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on recorded data, the Core 3 201E wins every category where measurements exist. It has verified scores in Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark suites covering multithread, single-thread, integer math, floating-point math, encryption, compression, extended instructions, random string sorting, physics, and prime number finding. Its 73rd percentile rank and average score of 19,056 place it in the company of the Ryzen 5 7535HS, Core i5-12400F, Core i5-1335U, and EPYC 7773X, all within 0.4% in aggregate.

The Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals. It cannot win any measured category because no measurements are recorded. The only areas where the Arc G3 holds a structural advantage are in its specifications: more cores, more cache, faster memory bandwidth, a smaller process node, a lower TDP, and a more capable integrated graphics unit (Arc B370 versus UHD Graphics 730). Those are architectural facts, not performance results.

For use cases that depend on verified throughput, such as multi-core rendering, compression, or encryption, the Core 3 201E is the only part with demonstrated numbers. For use cases that require ECC memory, it is also the only option. For scenarios that prioritize portability, low power draw, high memory bandwidth, or integrated graphics capability, the Arc G3 has the specification advantage, but the database offers no evidence of how that translates into actual benchmark performance.

The practical takeaway from the data is asymmetric. A builder choosing a desktop CPU can rely on the Core 3 201E's measured results and its near parity with four established rivals. A builder considering the Arc G3 has only its specifications to weigh, with no recorded performance to validate them.