AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Intel Arc G3 EXTREME Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

CORE STATE Shimada Peak
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 4.5 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 350W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Arc G3 EXTREME

CORE STATE Panther Lake
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 14 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 25W
ARCHITECTURE Panther Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
5,996
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
846
267
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
24,987
10,945
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
3,527
1,545
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
59,494
14,655
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
8,399
1,862
passmark_data_compression
920,954
307,094
passmark_data_encryption
44,389
23,881
passmark_extended_instructions
76,363
24,017
passmark_find_prime_numbers
337
248
passmark_floating_point_math
156,215
86,929
passmark_integer_math
236,120
71,164
passmark_multithread
67,035
30,659
passmark_physics
4,156
2,515
passmark_random_string_sorting
99,813
37,331
passmark_single_thread
4,530
4,293
passmark_singlethread
4,530
4,293

Analysis: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX vs Intel Arc G3 EXTREME

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the decisive winner in this comparison, taking all 17 head-to-head benchmark matchups against the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME. The data shows a complete performance sweep, with the Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivering massive leads across every workload category, from single-threaded tasks to heavily parallelized rendering.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic gap appears in Cinebench R23 multicore, where the AMD processor scores 59,494 against the Intel's 14,655, a 306% advantage. This result reflects the fundamental difference between a 16-core desktop workstation processor and a 14-core mobile chip with no multithreading support. The single-core Cinebench R23 result is even more lopsided in percentage terms: the AMD scores 8,399 versus 1,862, giving it a 351.1% lead, which indicates the Zen 5 architecture delivers substantially higher per-thread performance than the Panther Lake mobile part.

Cinebench R15 shows a similar pattern. The Threadripper PRO 9955WX scores 5,996 in multicore versus 2,192, a 173.5% win. In R15 single-core, the AMD leads 846 to 267, a 216.9% margin. The R20 results are nearly identical in both metrics, with the AMD scoring 24,987 multicore and 3,527 single-core against the Intel's 10,945 and 1,545, both delivering a 128.3% advantage.

PassMark integer math is another decisive win for the AMD part, scoring 236,120 versus 71,164, a 231.8% lead. Floating-point math shows a smaller but still clear gap: 156,215 versus 86,929, a 79.7% difference. Data compression favors the AMD by 199.9%, with scores of 920,954 against 307,094. Extended instruction performance is 218% higher on the AMD, scoring 76,363 versus 24,017.

The closest contest is PassMark single-thread performance. The AMD scores 4,530 and the Intel scores 4,293, a margin of only 5.5%. This shows that despite the massive architectural differences in core count and power envelope, the Intel Panther Lake core is reasonably competitive in light single-threaded workloads. However, the AMD still wins this test, and the PassMark multithread score stretches the gap back out: 67,035 versus 30,659, a 118.6% lead.

Data encryption shows an 85.9% advantage for the AMD (44,389 versus 23,881), while random string sorting is 167.4% higher (99,813 versus 37,331). Prime number finding is the narrowest multicore margin, with the AMD at 337 versus 248, a 35.9% lead. Physics performance favors the AMD by 65.2%, scoring 4,156 versus 2,515.

Architecture Differences

The two processors occupy opposite ends of the compute spectrum. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Shimada Peak, built on a 4 nm TSMC process. It contains 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME uses the Panther Lake architecture on Intel's 3 nm process, with 14 cores and 14 threads, running at 1.90 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. The lack of multithreading on the Intel part halves its thread count relative to core count, while the AMD doubles its cores into 32 threads.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The AMD's larger L3 pool is more suited to workstation datasets, while the Intel's per-core L2 is proportionally bigger.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The AMD supports DDR5 over an eight-channel memory bus, delivering 409.6 GB/s of bandwidth with ECC support. The Intel uses LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth and no ECC. The AMD has nearly three times the memory bandwidth, which directly supports its multicore throughput results.

PCIe connectivity is also starkly different. The AMD exposes 128 Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel provides 4 Gen 5 lanes. The AMD uses socket sTR5 and is an unlocked multiplier part, while the Intel is socketed BGA 2540 with a locked multiplier. The AMD has no integrated graphics, while the Intel includes Arc B390 integrated graphics. The AMD is a desktop market segment part with a 350 TDP, while the Intel is a mobile part with a 25 TDP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX wins every single-core test. In Cinebench R23 single-core it scores 8,399 versus 1,862, a 351.1% lead. The closest margin is PassMark single-thread, where the AMD scores 4,530 versus 4,293, a 5.5% advantage.

Q: How large is the multicore performance gap?

A: The AMD leads by 306% in Cinebench R23 multicore (59,494 versus 14,655) and by 118.6% in PassMark multithread (67,035 versus 30,659). The smallest multicore margin is in prime number finding, where the AMD leads 337 to 248, a 35.9% difference.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX delivers 409.6 GB/s over an eight-channel DDR5 bus with ECC support. The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME provides 136.5 GB/s over a dual-channel LPDDR5X bus without ECC.

Q: Do these processors use the same manufacturing process?

A: No. The AMD uses a 4 nm node from TSMC, containing 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die. The Intel uses a 3 nm node from Intel, with no transistor or die size data recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD provides 128 Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The Intel provides 4 Gen 5 lanes. This reflects the AMD's workstation positioning versus the Intel's mobile design.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD has an average benchmark score of 101,041 and sits in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel has an average score of 36,699 and sits in the 85th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification. The AMD has 16 cores and 32 threads; the Intel has 14 cores and 14 threads. Base clocks are 4.50 GHz versus 1.90 GHz, and boost clocks are 5.40 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP is 350 for the AMD and 25 for the Intel.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket sTR5 for the AMD, Intel BGA 2540 for the Intel. The AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process with 16,630 million transistors and a 2x 70.6 mm² die, while the Intel uses a 3 nm Intel process with no transistor or die size data. Cache configurations differ in every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for the AMD versus 192 KB per core for the Intel; L2 is 1 MB per core versus 2.5 MB per core; L3 is 64 MB versus 18 MB shared.

Memory support differs: DDR5 versus LPDDR5X; eight-channel versus dual-channel; 409.6 GB/s versus 136.5 GB/s; ECC true versus false. PCIe lanes are 128 versus 4, both Gen 5. The AMD has no integrated graphics; the Intel includes Arc B390. Market segment is Desktop for the AMD and Mobile for the Intel. The AMD has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel is locked. Release dates are 2025-07-22 for the AMD and 2026-05-27 for the Intel. The AMD has a launch MSRP of $1649; the Intel has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX outperforms the Intel Arc G3 EXTREME in every measured benchmark. The AMD wins all 17 head-to-head tests, with leads ranging from 5.5% in PassMark single-thread to 351.1% in Cinebench R23 single-core. The average benchmark score of 101,041 for the AMD versus 36,699 for the Intel places the two parts in different performance classes entirely.

The AMD's nearest rivals are server and workstation processors: the AMD EPYC 7513 (102,244 average score, 1.2% above), the AMD EPYC 8324P (103,329, 2.2% above), the AMD EPYC 4585PX (99,324, 1.7% below), and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX (98,504, 2.6% below). This places the 9955WX squarely in the high-end workstation tier.

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME's nearest rivals are mainstream desktop and mobile processors: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36,938, 0.6% above), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36,945, 0.7% above), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37,018, 0.9% above), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37,093, 1.1% above). The Intel part competes with mid-range chips, not with the Threadripper class.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX is the choice for any workload that scales with cores, threads, memory bandwidth, or cache. Its wins span Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both single and multicore tests, plus every PassMark workload: data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread. The 350 TDP, 128 PCIe lanes, eight-channel DDR5 with 409.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 64 MB L3 cache all support sustained heavy compute.

The Intel Arc G3 EXTREME does not win any benchmark in this comparison. Its only near-competitive result is PassMark single-thread, where it trails by 5.5%. Its strengths are in its mobile profile: a 25 TDP, integrated Arc B390 graphics, and a 3 nm Intel process. For applications that require minimal power draw, a compact BGA 2540 platform, and onboard graphics, the Intel part offers those attributes, but the performance data does not show any compute workload where it beats the AMD processor.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Threadripper PRO 9955WX
G3 EXTREME
Core Specs
Cores
16
14 -12.5%
Threads
32
14 -56.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
4.5
1.9 -57.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.4
4.7 -13.0%
Frequency (GHz)
4.5
1.9 -57.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.4
4.7 -13.0%
Multiplier
45
19 -57.8%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
350
25 -92.9%
Configurable TDP
15-45 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Shimada Peak
Panther Lake
Generation
Ryzen Threadripper (Zen 4 (Storm Peak))
Arc G3 (Panther Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
409.6 GB/s
136.5 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket sTR5
Intel BGA 2540
Chipsets
WRX90, TRX50, Pro 695
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
LP E-Cores
4
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 46 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Arc B390
Other
Market
Desktop
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$1649
Part Number
100-000000725
SA4R3
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-BGA
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX Details View Arc G3 EXTREME Details