AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX vs Intel Core i5-10300H Comparison

The benchmark data presents a decisive matchup: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX outperforms the Intel Core i5-10300H in every single head-to-head test recorded, with a perfect 8-0 win record. This is not a close contest; the Threadripper PRO delivers overwhelmingly higher scores across all Cinebench and Geekbench workloads, making the comparison less about nuance and more about scale. The data shows a workstation-class processor utterly dominating a mobile chip in raw compute capability.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-10300H has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How significant is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The gap is massive. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 34,204 against Intel's 6,950, a 392.1% difference. Geekbench multi-core shows a 227.7% lead for AMD (13,371 vs 4,080).

Q: Is the AMD processor faster in single-core tests too?

A: Yes, the AMD wins all single-core tests as well. In Geekbench single-core, it scores 2,059 versus Intel's 1,321, a 55.9% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 392.2% delta (4,828 vs 981).

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX supports eight-channel memory with a bandwidth of 204.8 GB/s, whereas the Intel Core i5-10300H uses dual-channel memory with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do these processors use the same socket?

A: No, they are incompatible. The AMD uses AMD Socket WRX8, while the Intel uses Intel BGA 1440, indicating different platforms and intended markets (workstation vs mobile).

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i5-10300H includes integrated UHD Graphics. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX does not list any integrated graphics in the data.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two processors explains their divergent performance profiles. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is built on TSMC's 7 nm process node and uses the Zen 3 architecture with the codename "Chagall PRO," part of the Ryzen Threadripper generation. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The chip contains 16,600 million transistors across a 4x 81 mm² die configuration. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache. This is a server/workstation part designed for extreme multi-threaded throughput, evidenced by its eight-channel DDR4 memory bus and 204.8 GB/s bandwidth. It supports ECC memory and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 128 lanes from the CPU.

In stark contrast, the Intel Core i5-10300H is a mobile processor from the Core 10th Gen series, built on Intel's 14 nm process using the Comet Lake architecture (Comet Lake-H). It has only 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its cache is far smaller: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and a shared 6 MB of L3. It supports both DDR3 and DDR4 memory via a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. The Intel chip includes integrated UHD Graphics, a feature absent from the AMD part. Its PCIe implementation is Gen 3, a generation behind the AMD's Gen 4. These are fundamentally different classes of silicon: one is a high-core-count workstation behemoth, the other is a power-efficient mobile chip.

Where Each One Wins

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX wins every single benchmark category listed. There is no workload in the provided results where the Intel Core i5-10300H comes out ahead. The AMD processor's wins span all Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 tests, both multi-core and single-core, as well as both Geekbench multi-core and single-core tests.

For the AMD, the biggest wins are in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 34,204 versus 6,950 represents the largest absolute margin, translating to a 392.1% delta. This suggests the AMD is ideal for rendering, simulation, and any task that can utilize its 12 cores and 24 threads. Even in single-core tests, where the clock speeds are similar (both boost to 4.50 GHz), the AMD maintains a commanding lead, particularly in Cinebench R15 single-core where it scores 486 versus 98 (a 395.9% delta). The Intel processor's only potential advantage lies in its integrated graphics and lower power profile, but in pure CPU benchmark performance, it has no wins. The Intel chip's results, such as a 3DMark 16-thread score of 2,965 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 8,262, are not part of the head-to-head comparison, but they underscore its lower absolute performance ceiling.

Specification Differences

The specification tables reveal stark contrasts in nearly every category. The core and thread counts differ dramatically: 12 cores/24 threads for AMD versus 4 cores/8 threads for Intel. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 4.10 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz, though both boost to 4.50 GHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is not comparable: the AMD is rated at 280 W, while the Intel is at 45 W, reflecting their different market segments (Server/Workstation vs Mobile).

Process technology differs significantly: AMD uses TSMC's 7 nm node, while Intel uses its own 14 nm process. Cache configurations are distinct: the AMD has 512 KB L2 per core and 64 MB L3, while the Intel has 256 KB L2 per core and 6 MB L3. Memory support diverges: AMD uses eight-channel DDR4 with 204.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support; Intel uses dual-channel DDR3/DDR4 with 46.9 GB/s and no ECC. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD offers Gen 4 with 128 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 3 (no lane count specified). The AMD has no integrated graphics; the Intel includes UHD Graphics. Their sockets are entirely different (WRX8 vs BGA 1440), and they belong to different generations (5000 series vs Core 10th Gen). Release dates also differ: AMD launched on 2022-03-07, while Intel launched on 2020-09-16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data tells a story of complete dominance by the AMD processor. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 3,447 against the Intel's 700, a delta of 392.4%. The single-core R15 test shows an even larger relative gap: 486 versus 98, a 395.9% delta. This pattern repeats across the entire Cinebench suite. In R20 multi-core, AMD's 14,365 dwarfs Intel's 2,919 (392.1% delta), and in R20 single-core, 2,027 versus 412 (392% delta). The R23 tests continue the trend: multi-core shows 34,204 versus 6,950 (392.1% delta), and single-core shows 4,828 versus 981 (392.2% delta).

Geekbench results follow the same direction but with a smaller relative gap. The multi-core test shows AMD at 13,371 versus Intel's 4,080, a 227.7% delta. The single-core test narrows the gap to 55.9%, with scores of 2,059 and 1,321 respectively. While this single-core delta is still a clear win for AMD, it is the closest margin in the entire dataset. This suggests that in lightly-threaded, latency-sensitive tasks, the Intel chip is relatively less disadvantaged than in heavily threaded workloads. However, the absolute performance advantage still resides with the AMD part. The data shows zero wins for the Intel chip across all eight head-to-head benchmarks.

The Verdict

The verdict from the data is clear and one-sided. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the superior processor in every measurable way within this comparison. It wins all eight head-to-head benchmarks, with deltas ranging from 55.9% (Geekbench single-core) to 395.9% (Cinebench R15 single-core). For any user prioritizing raw CPU performance, the AMD is the unequivocal choice.

The Intel Core i5-10300H, while falling far behind in compute benchmarks, occupies a different niche. Its 45 W TDP, integrated UHD Graphics, and mobile socket (BGA 1440) indicate it is designed for laptops where power efficiency and space constraints are paramount. The data does not support choosing the Intel for performance reasons, as it loses every test. However, the Intel's integrated graphics and lower power envelope are features the AMD lacks, suggesting it belongs in portable systems where the AMD's workstation-class platform is not viable. For workstation workloads like rendering, simulation, and heavy multi-threading, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the definitive pick based on its overwhelming benchmark victories. For a mobile, power-conscious system, the Intel chip is the only one of the two that fits that form factor, though its performance will be far lower. The benchmark results indicate that these processors are not direct competitors but rather serve entirely different market segments, with the AMD being the clear performance champion.