CPU Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher core count?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Threadripper doubles the core and thread counts of its rival.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E boosts to 4.70 GHz, whereas the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X reaches 4.00 GHz. Intel holds a 0.70 GHz advantage in maximum turbo frequency.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X does not. This makes Intel the choice for error-correcting memory workloads.

Q: How do the two CPUs compare in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X scores 2772 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is 8.1% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14401E’s 2564. Despite Intel’s higher boost clock, AMD wins this test.

Q: What is the TDP difference between these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a TDP of 180 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14401E is rated at 65 watts. Intel’s chip draws substantially less power by specification.

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has an average benchmark score of 5306, compared to 5253 for the Intel Core i5-14401E. Both processors sit at the 60th percentile of all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is built on the Zen architecture, codenamed Whitehaven, using a 14 nm process from GlobalFoundries. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. The chip is fabricated with 9,600 million transistors across a dual-die design measuring 2x 213 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Threadripper uses AMD Socket SP3r2, supports DDR4 memory in a quad-channel configuration, and provides 60 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. It has no integrated graphics and is unlocked for overclocking.

The Intel Core i5-14401E belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, built on Raptor Lake-R architecture with a 10 nm process from Intel. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The die size is 215 mm², and the cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This chip uses Intel Socket 1700, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. It includes UHD Graphics 730 as integrated graphics, supports ECC memory, and is multiplier-locked.

Key architectural differences include node size (14 nm vs 10 nm), memory channel count (quad vs dual), PCIe generation (Gen 3 vs Gen 5), and the presence of integrated graphics on Intel. AMD’s chip uses a dual-die layout, while Intel uses a monolithic design. The Threadripper’s transistor count is listed at 9,600 million; Intel’s is not specified in the data. Memory bandwidth is only listed for AMD at 85.3 GB/s, while Intel’s figure is absent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Across all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X wins every test. The margin is remarkably consistent, hovering around 8.1% in most cases.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Threadripper scores 1979 against Intel’s 1830, a delta of 8.1%. The R15 single-core test shows the same pattern: AMD scores 279, Intel scores 258, again an 8.1% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 8248 for AMD versus 7627 for Intel, an 8.1% advantage. The R20 single-core test shows AMD at 1164 and Intel at 1076, yielding an 8.2% lead, the largest margin in the entire comparison.

Cinebench R23 multicore continues the trend: AMD scores 19640, Intel scores 18161, a 8.1% difference. The R23 single-core test rounds out the set with AMD at 2772 and Intel at 2564, again 8.1% ahead. This uniformity suggests the Threadripper’s advantage is structural rather than workload-specific; it wins by roughly the same proportion across every rendering benchmark.

It is worth remembering Intel’s higher boost clock (4.70 GHz vs 4.00 GHz) does not translate into a single-core win. Despite a 0.70 GHz clock advantage, the Threadripper still leads in single-core scores by 8.1-8.2%. This indicates that architectural efficiency and cache configuration play a larger role than raw clock speed in these tests.

The average benchmark scores corroborate the head-to-head results. AMD’s average of 5306 slightly exceeds Intel’s 5253, a difference of about 1.0%. This narrower gap in average score, compared to the 8.1% head-to-head deltas, reflects that the two chips are close in overall performance when considering a broader benchmark mix, even though AMD wins every direct comparison in this dataset.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear winner: the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the Intel Core i5-14401E in every benchmark recorded in this comparison. With six wins out of six head-to-head tests, the Threadripper holds a consistent 8.1-8.2% advantage across both single-core and multicore Cinebench workloads.

However, the choice is not simply about raw performance. The Intel Core i5-14401E offers ECC memory support, integrated graphics, and a substantially lower TDP of 65 watts compared to AMD’s 180 watts. Intel also supports newer PCIe Gen 5 connectivity and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory, while AMD is limited to PCIe Gen 3 and DDR4.

The Threadripper’s advantages lie in its 12-core/24-thread configuration, larger 32 MB L3 cache, and quad-channel memory bus. Its launch MSRP was $799, though Intel’s launch MSRP is not listed in the data. Both CPUs sit at the 60th percentile of all processors, indicating they are closely matched in overall standing despite the head-to-head sweep.

Users who prioritize maximum rendering performance and multi-threaded throughput should choose the Threadripper. Users who need ECC memory, integrated graphics, lower power consumption, or modern PCIe Gen 5 lanes should consider the Intel chip, accepting the 8.1% performance deficit in these specific benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 3.50 GHz for AMD and 2.50 GHz for Intel; boost clocks are 4.00 GHz and 4.70 GHz, respectively. TDP is 180 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel.

Socket types differ: AMD uses Socket SP3r2, Intel uses Socket 1700. Architecture and generation are completely distinct, AMD’s Zen (Whitehaven) versus Intel’s Raptor Lake-R. Process nodes are 14 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. Die size is 2x 213 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. Transistors are listed as 9,600 million for AMD; no figure is provided for Intel.

Cache configurations differ significantly: AMD has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB L3; Intel has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB L3. Memory support is DDR4 quad-channel for AMD, versus DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 85.3 GB/s for AMD; Intel’s is not listed. ECC support is absent on AMD and present on Intel. PCIe is Gen 3 with 60 lanes for AMD, versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics exist only on Intel (UHD Graphics 730). AMD is multiplier-unlocked; Intel is locked. Release dates are 2017-08-09 for AMD and 2024-06-30 for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X wins in all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons. Its victories span every Cinebench version tested, R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multicore modes. The consistent 8.1-8.2% margin suggests the Threadripper is the better choice for rendering workloads, 3D modeling, video encoding, and any task that relies heavily on CPU compute. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, and 32 MB L3 cache provide a solid foundation for multi-threaded applications. The quad-channel memory bus with 85.3 GB/s bandwidth also favors memory-intensive workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in areas not covered by the benchmark suite. Its ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstations where data integrity is critical. The integrated UHD Graphics 730 provides a display output without a discrete GPU. The 65-watt TDP makes it far more energy-efficient by specification. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers newer connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. Dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support gives users memory flexibility. The higher 4.70 GHz boost clock could benefit lightly threaded applications that are not reflected in the Cinebench results, though the data shows AMD still wins single-core tests despite this clock disadvantage.

In summary, the Threadripper dominates the benchmark metrics, while the Intel chip wins on platform features, power efficiency, and memory flexibility. The choice depends entirely on whether raw compute performance or platform capabilities matter more for the intended use case.