CPU Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1375PRE and AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 are closely matched processors, both sitting at the 59th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel part holds a narrow but consistent edge across every single benchmark in the comparison set, with the AMD chip trailing by margins that are almost negligible in real-world terms. The average benchmark scores tell the same story: the i7-1375PRE posts an average of 4985, while the V3C48 scores 4967, a difference of less than 0.4 percent.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is remarkably consistent, with the Intel Core i7-1375PRE winning all six head-to-head comparisons by a narrow margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel chip scores 1737 against the AMD's 1730, a 0.4 percent advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern: 245 versus 244, again a 0.4 percent win for Intel. These are tight margins, but they hold across every workload tested.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore results show the i7-1375PRE at 7239 and the V3C48 at 7212, another 0.4 percent gap. The single-core R20 test sees Intel at 1021 and AMD at 1018, the narrowest margin in the entire set at just 0.3 percent. The trend continues in Cinebench R23, where the Intel part scores 17236 multicore and 2433 single-core, while the AMD chip scores 17172 and 2424 respectively. In both R23 tests, the delta is 0.4 percent in favor of Intel.

The consistency of these results is notable. The Intel processor does not suddenly pull ahead in any one test; instead, it maintains a steady, small lead across the board. This suggests a fundamental, if modest, performance advantage rather than a workload-specific strength. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 never wins a single head-to-head matchup, but the losses are consistently small enough that the two chips are effectively in the same performance tier. The largest delta in any test is 0.4 percent, which is within run-to-run variance for most benchmark suites.

Where Each One Wins

Given that the Intel Core i7-1375PRE wins all six head-to-head benchmarks, it is the clear winner in raw compute performance across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, in both single-core and multicore workloads. The data shows no test where the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 takes the lead. However, the AMD chip is not without its own merits, particularly in areas that the benchmark scores do not capture.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part. This makes it a more suitable candidate for reliability-sensitive applications where memory corruption is a critical concern. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz compared to Intel's 1.90 GHz, though the Intel part boosts much higher at 4.80 GHz versus AMD's 3.80 GHz. For workloads that are sensitive to sustained base clocks, the AMD part may hold an advantage in power-constrained scenarios, but the benchmark data does not directly reflect this.

The Intel Core i7-1375PRE integrates Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, providing a built-in GPU solution, while the AMD chip has no integrated graphics listed. For systems requiring a display output without a discrete GPU, the Intel part is the only option of the two. The Intel chip also has a larger L3 cache at 24 MB shared, compared to AMD's 16 MB shared, and a larger L2 cache per core. These cache advantages may contribute to its benchmark wins, though the margins are small.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE has an average benchmark score of 4985, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48's average of 4967.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two in any single benchmark?

A: The largest delta in any head-to-head test is 0.4 percent, seen in Cinebench R15 multicore, R15 single-core, R20 multicore, R23 multicore, and R23 single-core, all favoring the Intel Core i7-1375PRE.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has ECC memory support, while the Intel Core i7-1375PRE does not.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE features Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses a 6 nm process from TSMC.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in their core configurations. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also diverge: the Intel chip has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, whereas the AMD part runs at 3.30 GHz base and 3.80 GHz boost. The TDP figures are different as well, with the Intel part rated at 28 watts and the AMD part at 45 watts.

Memory support is another differentiator. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 supports only DDR5. The AMD chip lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Intel part does not have a bandwidth figure in the data. ECC memory support is exclusive to the AMD chip, as is the socket type: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel BGA 1744.

The cache layouts are entirely different. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip also has a larger die size at 217 mm², while the AMD die size is not listed. The integrated graphics are exclusive to the Intel part, and the market segments differ, with Intel classified as Mobile and AMD as Desktop.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is substantial. The Intel Core i7-1375PRE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P codename, using a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The smaller process node gives AMD a manufacturing advantage in principle, but the benchmark results do not show a corresponding performance lead.

Core counts highlight a major structural difference: the Intel chip has 14 cores versus AMD's 8 cores, and 20 threads versus 16. This suggests Intel relies on a higher core count to achieve its benchmark scores, while AMD's 8 cores are likely larger and more efficient per core. The cache hierarchy reinforces this: Intel allocates 2 MB of L2 per core, while AMD allocates only 512 KB per core, but Intel's total L3 is 24 MB against AMD's 16 MB. The Intel chip also includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, an integrated GPU that is absent from the AMD part. The AMD chip compensates with ECC memory support and a higher rated memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, though the Intel part's memory bandwidth is not specified.

The release dates differ by just over three months, with the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 launching on 2022-09-26 and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE arriving on 2023-01-03. Both processors are currently listed as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-1375PRE outperforms the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 in every measured workload, but the margins are so small that they border on negligible. Across six Cinebench tests, the Intel chip leads by 0.4 percent in five and by 0.3 percent in one. For most users, this level of difference will not be perceptible in real-world applications. The Intel part's advantage likely stems from its larger core count (14 versus 8) and more generous cache (24 MB L3 versus 16 MB), though it also carries a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is not without reason for selection. Its ECC memory support is a critical feature for error-sensitive workloads, and its 45-watt TDP, while higher than Intel's 28 watts, is paired with a higher base clock of 3.30 GHz. The AMD chip also uses a more advanced 6 nm process, which in theory offers better power efficiency per transistor, though the benchmark scores do not reflect a performance benefit. For systems that require ECC memory or that target the Desktop market segment, the AMD part is the appropriate choice.

For pure compute performance, the data supports the Intel Core i7-1375PRE. It wins every head-to-head comparison, has a higher average benchmark score, and offers integrated graphics for systems that need a display output without a discrete GPU. The Intel chip is also the only one of the two with a boost clock above 4 GHz, reaching 4.80 GHz. The decision ultimately comes down to whether the AMD chip's ECC support and embedded positioning outweigh a consistent, if small, performance deficit. The data suggests that for raw throughput, the Intel Core i7-1375PRE is the stronger pick, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is the more specialized option for reliability-focused deployments.