AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Core i3-12300HE Comparison

The Intel Core i3-12300HE and AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 are two 45 W processors aimed at different market segments—mobile versus embedded desktop—yet they land in the same performance tier. Benchmark data shows the Intel part winning all six Cinebench comparisons, but the margins are consistently narrow, with every deltaPct between 0.4% and 0.6%. Both CPUs sit at the 59th percentile among all tested processors, and their average benchmark scores differ by just 28 points (4995 vs. 4967), placing them in the same competitive bracket as the Intel Xeon W-2150B, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, and Intel Core i5-13500TE.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-12300HE takes a clean sweep across all six Cinebench tests, but the victories are slim. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, Intel scores 1740 against AMD’s 1730, a 0.6% edge. The R15 single-core result is nearly identical: 245 versus 244, a 0.4% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core gap widens slightly to 7254 versus 7212 (0.6%), while single-core shows 1023 versus 1018 (0.5%). The pattern holds in Cinebench R23, where Intel leads multi-core at 17272 against 17172 (0.6%) and single-core at 2438 versus 2424 (0.6%).

These margins are within run-to-run noise for most workloads, yet they are consistent across every test iteration. The largest single delta is 0.6%, which appears in four of the six benchmarks. This consistency suggests a slight architectural advantage for Intel rather than random variation. However, the absolute differences are tiny: in R23 multi-core, the gap is exactly 100 points, and in R15 single-core, it is just one point.

The Intel part’s average benchmark score of 4995 places it between the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, +0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G (5002, -0.1%). The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 averages 4967, sitting between the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G (4949, +0.4%) and the Intel Core i5-12600HE (4980, -0.3%). Notably, the Intel Core i7-1375PRE appears in both rivals lists, with the i3-12300HE leading it by 0.2% and the Ryzen Embedded trailing it by 0.4%. This places both CPUs within a 0.5% band of each other when viewed through their nearest rival comparisons.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i3-12300HE scores 17272 versus 17172 for the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48, a 0.6% advantage. This is the largest multi-core margin in the head-to-head data.

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: Intel leads in all three Cinebench single-core tests. The widest gap is 0.6% in R23 (2438 vs. 2424), while R15 shows just a one-point difference (245 vs. 244, 0.4%).

Q: Are these processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are at the 59th percentile among all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores are 4995 for Intel and 4967 for AMD, a difference of 28 points.

Q: What are the closest rivals for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i3-12300HE’s nearest rival is the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, +0.1%). The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 4700G (4949, +0.4%).

Q: Does the AMD chip have more threads?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 16 threads versus 12 threads on the Intel Core i3-12300HE, despite both having 8 cores.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i3-12300HE does not list ECC support.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-12300HE wins every benchmark in the head-to-head set, making its case straightforward for raw Cinebench performance. The margins are small but universal: six wins out of six tests, with no test where AMD takes the lead. If the selection criteria is purely benchmark score, Intel is the pick. The largest advantage appears in multi-core workloads, where the 0.6% delta translates to a 100-point gap in R23 and a 42-point gap in R20.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48, despite losing every benchmark, offers strengths outside the Cinebench suite. It has 16 threads versus 12, a 33% thread advantage that could benefit highly parallel workloads not captured in these tests. Its 16 MB of L3 cache is 4 MB larger than Intel’s 12 MB. It also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part, which matters for reliability-sensitive embedded applications. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth is specified at 76.8 GB/s, a figure not listed for the Intel processor.

For use-case selection, Intel wins where Cinebench scores are the primary metric. AMD wins where thread count, ECC support, or larger L3 cache are decisive factors. The 45 W TDP is identical for both, so thermal design does not differentiate them. The AMD part is a desktop-market chip, while Intel targets mobile, which may influence platform decisions but does not show up in benchmark deltas.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on several core specifications. The Intel Core i3-12300HE has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: Intel runs at 1900 MHz, AMD at 3300 MHz. Boost clocks are closer, with Intel at 4.30 GHz and AMD at 3.80 GHz. Cache configurations also differ: Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3; AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3.

Memory support shows a split: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. ECC memory is supported only on the AMD part. The Intel chip has a 217 mm² die size, while no die size is listed for AMD. Process nodes differ at 10 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for AMD. Sockets are unique to each: Intel BGA 1744 versus AMD Socket FP7. The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics integrated graphics; AMD lists no integrated graphics.

Both processors use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part has a release date of 2022-09-26; Intel’s release date is not listed. Production status is Active for both. Part numbers are SRLE8 for Intel and 100-000000817 for AMD. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the data.

Architecture Differences

Intel’s Core i3-12300HE is built on Alder Lake architecture, specifically the Alder Lake-H codename, using a 10 nm process at Intel’s foundry. AMD’s Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. This represents a node advantage for AMD, but the benchmark results do not reflect a performance lead from the smaller process.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Intel allocates more L1 (80 KB vs. 64 KB per core) and more L2 (1.25 MB vs. 512 KB per core), while AMD offers more L3 (16 MB vs. 12 MB shared). AMD’s thread advantage comes from simultaneous multithreading, giving 16 threads on 8 cores versus Intel’s 12 threads on 8 cores. Intel’s Alder Lake architecture is a hybrid design, though the data does not specify performance or efficiency core counts. AMD’s Zen 3+ is a monolithic design with uniform cores.

The Intel processor includes integrated UHD Graphics; AMD does not list any integrated graphics for the V3C48. This makes the AMD part dependent on a discrete GPU or external graphics solution. The Intel chip’s die size is listed at 217 mm², while AMD’s is not provided. The manufacturing foundry differs (Intel vs. TSMC), and the process node gap (10 nm vs. 6 nm) is the most significant architectural distinction.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i3-12300HE as the higher-performing processor in Cinebench tests, winning all six benchmarks with margins between 0.4% and 0.6%. For users whose primary concern is raw multi-threaded or single-threaded Cinebench scores, Intel is the clear choice. The 100-point R23 multi-core gap, while small in percentage terms, is a consistent lead across every test.

However, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 should be selected for specific use cases that align with its feature set. Its 16 threads versus 12 provide more parallel capacity for workloads that scale beyond 12 threads. The 16 MB L3 cache is 4 MB larger than Intel’s 12 MB, which may benefit cache-sensitive applications. ECC memory support is a decisive factor for systems requiring error correction, a feature entirely absent on the Intel part. The AMD chip’s higher base clock (3.30 GHz vs. 1.90 GHz) could offer better responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks that do not boost to maximum frequency.

The choice ultimately depends on whether benchmark scores or platform features take priority. Both processors sit at the same 59th percentile and within 0.5% of each other in average score. The Intel part wins on measured performance. The AMD part wins on thread count, ECC, and cache capacity. For embedded deployments where data integrity matters, AMD’s ECC support is the deciding factor. For general compute where Cinebench represents the workload mix, Intel’s consistent wins make it the safer pick. The 45 W TDP is identical, so power envelopes do not differentiate them. Neither processor offers an unlocked multiplier, and both use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel chip’s integrated graphics give it an edge for systems that need display output without a discrete GPU, while AMD requires external graphics. The verdict is a split decision: Intel for benchmark performance, AMD for features and thread count.