AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Intel Xeon D-1732TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a remarkably consistent picture across all six Cinebench tests: the Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins every single head-to-head matchup, yet the margins are uniformly narrow. The largest gap appears in the R15 single-core test, where Intel leads by 2.3% (171 versus 167), and the same 2.3% delta repeats in R20 multi-core, R23 multi-core, and R23 single-core. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I trails by 2.2% in R15 multi-core and R20 single-core, making the closest contests those two specific workloads.

What stands out immediately is that the AMD part never claims a single victory. The head-to-head table records zero wins for the Ryzen and six wins for the Xeon. However, the magnitude of those wins matters for interpretation. A 2.2% to 2.3% deficit across the board is not a generational gap; it is a narrow, consistent margin that suggests the two processors are operating in the same performance tier despite their architectural differences.

The average benchmark score reinforces this reading. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I posts an average score of 3406, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE reaches 3486. That difference works out to roughly 2.3%, which aligns almost exactly with the individual test deltas. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs in the database, an identical placement that further confirms their comparable standing in the broader landscape.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each part adds context. The AMD chip's closest competitors include the Intel Xeon E-2236 at 3410 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Xeon E-2146G also at 3410 (0.1%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U at 3394 (0.4% in favor of the V3C18I). The Intel Xeon D-1732TE, meanwhile, sits near the Intel Core i9-10900TE at 3484 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon E-2246G at 3492 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 at 3494 (0.2% behind). These rival clusters show that both chips are embedded in dense neighborhoods of similar-performing hardware.

The absolute scores tell the full story. In R15 multi-core, the Xeon scores 1214 against the Ryzen's 1187. In R15 single-core, it is 171 versus 167. The R20 tests show 5061 versus 4946 in multi-core and 714 versus 698 in single-core. Finally, R23 results put the Xeon at 12052 versus 11777 in multi-core and 1701 versus 1662 in single-core. Every test follows the same pattern: the Intel part leads by a small but consistent margin, never more than 2.3% and never less than 2.2%.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks in the head-to-head comparison?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins all six recorded Cinebench tests. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I records zero wins in the head-to-head data.

Q: How large is the performance gap between the two processors?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE leads by 2.2% or 2.3% in every test. The average benchmark score difference is 3486 versus 3406, a gap of approximately 2.3%.

Q: Do the two processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores and 16 threads. This shared configuration makes the small performance differences more notable.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE boosts to 3.00 GHz. Despite the higher boost clock, the Intel part still wins every benchmark.

Q: What are the memory architecture differences?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 on a triple-channel bus with 64.0 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

Q: How do their process nodes compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is built on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. This includes both multi-core and single-core workloads across three generations of Cinebench tests (R15, R20, and R23). For users prioritizing maximum Cinebench throughput, the Intel part is the clear choice, though the margin is slim.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I does not win any recorded benchmark, but the data suggests it is not far behind. In use cases where the workload is comparable to Cinebench rendering, the AMD chip should deliver near-identical performance, trailing by only 2.2% to 2.3%. The practical difference in real-world tasks would likely be imperceptible in many scenarios.

Where the AMD processor does show advantages is in specifications that are not directly benchmarked here. It has a substantially higher boost clock (3.80 GHz versus 3.00 GHz), a smaller process node (6 nm versus 10 nm), and a dramatically lower thermal design power (15 watts versus 52 watts). These factors could make it the more attractive option in power-constrained environments, even though the measured performance favors Intel.

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE, meanwhile, offers a higher L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 512 KB) and a larger L1 cache per core (80 KB versus 64 KB). Its triple-channel DDR4 memory configuration, while lower in total bandwidth than the AMD's dual-channel DDR5, may appeal to systems already invested in DDR4 infrastructure.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several core specifications: both have 8 cores, 16 threads, a base clock of 1900.00 MHz, and ECC memory support. Neither has a multiplier unlocked, and neither includes integrated graphics.

The differences begin with boost clock: the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I reaches 3.80 GHz, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE tops out at 3.00 GHz. The thermal design power diverges sharply, with the AMD part rated at 15 watts and the Intel part at 52 watts. Their sockets differ as well, with AMD using Socket FP7 and Intel using BGA 2227.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD processor uses DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor uses DDR4 on a triple-channel bus with 64.0 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Cache hierarchies show notable structural differences. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 15 MB of shared L3. The Intel part thus has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, while the AMD part has slightly more L3 overall.

The market segments differ: the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is classified as Desktop, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE is classified as Server/Workstation. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $730, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. Release dates also differ, with the Intel part arriving on 2022-02-23 and the AMD part on 2022-09-26.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is built on AMD's Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt, and belongs to the Ryzen Embedded generation. It uses a 6 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE uses Ice Lake architecture, specifically the Ice Lake-D variant, and belongs to the Xeon D generation. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

These architectural choices explain several observed differences. The AMD part's smaller 6 nm process node likely contributes to its dramatically lower 15 watt TDP, while the Intel part's 10 nm node and higher 52 watt TDP allow for different power and thermal characteristics. Despite the process advantage, the AMD chip does not translate its architectural efficiency into benchmark wins in this comparison.

The cache structures reflect distinct design philosophies. Intel allocates more cache per core at the L1 and L2 levels, which can benefit workloads with high per-thread data locality. AMD allocates 16 MB of shared L3, which is 1 MB more than Intel's 15 MB but distributed differently across the chip. The Intel part's larger L2 (1.25 MB per core versus 512 KB per core) is a substantial difference that may partially offset the AMD part's higher boost clock in certain workloads.

Memory architecture also diverges at the system level. The AMD chip's DDR5 support and dual-channel configuration deliver 76.8 GB/s of theoretical bandwidth, while the Intel chip's DDR4 triple-channel setup delivers 64.0 GB/s. The AMD part has a bandwidth advantage of 12.8 GB/s, yet this does not translate into a benchmark victory. The Intel part's higher measured performance despite lower memory bandwidth suggests that other factors, such as cache efficiency or memory latency characteristics, may play a more significant role in Cinebench workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Xeon D-1732TE is the faster processor in every recorded Cinebench test. Its wins range from 2.2% to 2.3% across all six benchmarks, and its average score of 3486 exceeds the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I's 3406 by a consistent margin. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, which means they occupy the same performance tier in the database's broader ranking.

For users whose primary concern is raw Cinebench performance, the Intel Xeon D-1732TE is the data-supported choice. It wins every test, and while the margins are narrow, they are uniform and reproducible. The fact that the Intel part achieves these results with a lower boost clock (3.00 GHz versus 3.80 GHz) and lower memory bandwidth (64.0 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s) suggests its architectural efficiency in these workloads is superior.

For users who prioritize power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I presents a compelling alternative. Its 15 watt TDP is dramatically lower than the Intel part's 52 watt rating, and its 6 nm process node from TSMC represents a newer manufacturing technology. The AMD chip also offers more PCIe lanes (20 versus 16) and higher memory bandwidth (76.8 GB/s versus 64.0 GB/s). The performance cost for these advantages is only 2.2% to 2.3% in the recorded benchmarks.

The choice ultimately depends on the use case. Systems where power draw and thermal output are critical constraints would favor the AMD part, as its performance deficit is small enough to be acceptable in exchange for a 37 watt TDP advantage. Systems where every bit of Cinebench throughput matters, and where the 52 watt TDP is not a concern, would favor the Intel part. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE also carries a launch MSRP of $730, which the database records as its only pricing detail.

Neither processor unlocks multipliers, neither includes integrated graphics, and both support ECC memory. They are evenly matched in core count and thread count. The recorded data does not show a single scenario where the AMD chip outperforms the Intel chip, but it also does not show a scenario where the Intel chip dominates. The 2.2% to 2.3% margins are the entire story, and they are the story of two closely matched processors with different architectural priorities.