AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I vs Intel Core i7-10870H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data between the Intel Core i7-10870H and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is remarkably tight, with the Intel part taking a clean sweep across all six recorded Cinebench comparisons. The largest margin belongs to Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Intel chip scores 1673 against the AMD's 1662, a 0.7% advantage. Every other head-to-head test, from Cinebench R15 multi-core to Cinebench R20 single-core, shows the Intel processor winning by exactly 0.6%.

Looking at the multi-core results specifically, the Intel Core i7-10870H posts 1194 in Cinebench R15 multicore versus 1187 for the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I. The gap widens slightly in Cinebench R20 multicore, with Intel at 4977 and AMD at 4946. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Intel part reaches 11852, while the AMD settles at 11777. These are sub-1% differences, meaning the two chips are effectively interchangeable for heavily threaded workloads in the database's measurements.

Single-core performance tells a similar story. Cinebench R15 single-core has Intel at 168 and AMD at 167, a single-point difference. Cinebench R20 single-core shows the same pattern: Intel 702, AMD 698. The only test where the margin exceeds 0.6% is Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel's 1673 edges out AMD's 1662 by 0.7%. The recorded data indicates that neither chip holds a meaningful performance advantage in any of the tested scenarios.

The overall average benchmark scores place the Intel Core i7-10870H at 3446 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I at 3406. That 40-point gap translates to a 1.2% difference in aggregate performance. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs in the database, confirming their similar standing in the broader performance hierarchy. The Intel part's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600HS with an identical average score of 3447, while the AMD embedded chip's closest competitor is the Intel Xeon E-2236 at 3410, a 0.1% difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing ecosystems. The Intel Core i7-10870H belongs to the Comet Lake-H generation, built on Intel's 14 nm process node at Intel's own foundries. It is a mobile-class part, released on September 16, 2020. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I, by contrast, uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It targets the desktop segment and was released on September 26, 2022, roughly two years after the Intel chip.

Both parts feature 8 cores and 16 threads, so the compute resource count is identical. Cache hierarchies are also similar at first glance: each core gets 64 KB of L1 cache, and both share 16 MB of L3 cache. The key difference lies in L2 cache. The Intel chip provides 256 KB per core, while the AMD chip doubles that to 512 KB per core. For an 8-core processor, that means the AMD part holds a total of 4 MB more L2 cache, a meaningful difference for workloads that benefit from faster on-die data access.

Clock speeds favor Intel significantly. The Core i7-10870H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Ryzen Embedded V3C18I operates at a base clock of 1900.00 MHz (1.90 GHz) and boosts to 3.80 GHz. That 1.20 GHz boost clock gap is substantial, though the AMD chip's lower thermal design power of 15 watts versus Intel's 45 watts suggests a very different power envelope. The Intel part's higher clocks come with a triple-digit wattage cost, while the AMD part is designed for far more constrained thermal environments.

Memory support also diverges sharply. The Intel chip supports DDR4 memory, while the AMD chip supports DDR5. The AMD part specifies dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, a figure not recorded for the Intel part. ECC memory is supported on the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I but not on the Intel Core i7-10870H, a critical distinction for reliability-focused embedded deployments. PCIe connectivity differs as well: Intel provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The integrated graphics situation is asymmetrical. The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics, while the AMD part lists no integrated graphics in the database. This makes the Intel chip a more complete package for systems without a discrete GPU, though the embedded AMD part may be paired with external graphics in typical deployments. Socket requirements are incompatible: Intel BGA 1440 for the Core i7-10870H versus AMD Socket FP7 for the Ryzen Embedded V3C18I.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-10870H boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I boosts to 3.80 GHz. The Intel part holds a 1.20 GHz advantage in maximum clock speed.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-10870H and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I feature 8 cores and 16 threads. The performance differences in the database's benchmarks therefore come from architecture, clocks, and cache rather than core count.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core i7-10870H has a thermal design power of 45 watts, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I is rated at 15 watts. The AMD part consumes one-third the power budget of the Intel chip.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-10870H does not. This makes the AMD part more suitable for error-sensitive embedded or server-style workloads.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-10870H scores 11852, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I scores 11777. The Intel chip leads by 0.6%, a margin well within run-to-run variation.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i7-10870H supports DDR4 memory, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s.

The Verdict

The benchmark data paints a clear picture: these two processors are performance twins with different design priorities. The Intel Core i7-10870H wins all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, but the largest margin is only 0.7%. Users seeking maximum raw performance in the database's tests should choose the Intel part, as it holds a consistent, if narrow, edge across both single-core and multi-core workloads.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I, however, offers capabilities that the Intel chip lacks entirely. ECC memory support is an absolute requirement for many embedded and server deployments. The AMD chip also supports DDR5 memory with a specified bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, and its PCIe Gen 4 interface with 20 lanes doubles the bandwidth potential of Intel's Gen 3 implementation. The 15 watt TDP versus 45 watts makes the AMD part dramatically more power-efficient, which is often the deciding factor in embedded systems where thermal management is constrained.

From a pure performance standpoint, the Intel Core i7-10870H is the better choice, albeit by a hair. From a platform capability standpoint, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I offers modern memory, ECC, and PCIe features that the older Intel design cannot match. The recorded data shows both chips at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, so neither dominates the broader market. The decision should rest on which feature set matters more: Intel's slightly higher benchmark scores and integrated graphics, or AMD's ECC support, DDR5 compatibility, and significantly lower power draw.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-10870H | AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C18I |

|----------------|----------------------|---------------------------|

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Zen 3+ (Rembrandt) |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 1900.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | AMD Socket FP7 |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Not specified | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics | None listed |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2020-09-16 | 2022-09-26 |

| Part Number | SRK3Y | 100-000000559 |

The two processors share identical core counts, thread counts, L1 cache per core, and L3 cache capacity. The Intel chip is the only one with integrated graphics, while the AMD chip alone supports ECC memory and DDR5. The Intel part's 45 watt TDP and 5.00 GHz boost clock contrast sharply with the AMD part's 15 watt TDP and 3.80 GHz boost clock, reflecting their different target environments.