AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 vs Intel Core i5-1340P Comparison

The Intel Core i5-1340P and AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 are two processors that, on paper, target very different markets—one is a mobile part, the other an embedded desktop chip. Yet, the benchmark data places them in an extraordinarily tight race, with average scores of 4545 and 4532, respectively. This near-parity is reflected in their percentile ranking, as both sit at the 58th percentile of all CPUs. The data suggests a head-to-head comparison is not about finding a dominant winner, but about understanding the nuances of incremental performance differences and architectural trade-offs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results across the Cinebench suite are remarkably consistent, with the Intel Core i5-1340P winning all six tests by a margin that never exceeds 0.5%. In the multi-core tests, the Intel part scores 1584 in Cinebench R15, 6600 in R20, and 15716 in R23. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 trails by a hair in each instance, posting scores of 1579, 6580, and 15668, respectively. This results in a 0.3% delta for the R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, indicating that the 12-core Intel processor and the 8-core AMD processor deliver nearly identical throughput in heavily threaded workloads.

The single-core results tell a similar story of marginal Intel supremacy. The i5-1340P scores 223 in R15, 931 in R20, and 2218 in R23, while the Ryzen Embedded V2748 counters with 222, 929, and 2212. The deltas here are 0.5%, 0.2%, and 0.3%, respectively. The data shows that the Intel chip holds a consistent, albeit minuscule, advantage in every metric tested. The largest margin of victory for the Intel part is the 0.5% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core, which is functionally negligible in real-world terms but does mean that the Intel processor wins all six head-to-head benchmark comparisons. This clean sweep is notable, but the incredibly small deltas suggest that users would be hard-pressed to perceive any difference in raw performance.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Core i5-1340P is the outright performance winner, taking all six head-to-head benchmarks. The verdict for most users should be based on these marginal wins, but the context of each platform is crucial. The Intel part achieves this with a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz compared to the AMD's 4.25 GHz, and a larger 12 MB shared L3 cache versus 8 MB. However, the AMD chip counters with a higher base clock (2.90 GHz vs 1.90 GHz) and a more advanced 7 nm process node from TSMC, compared to Intel's 10 nm.

For a pure performance-per-benchmark perspective, the Intel Core i5-1340P is the choice. It wins every test, and its average benchmark score of 4545 is 0.3% higher than the AMD's 4532. The data also shows that both processors are closely matched against the same external rivals, with the Intel Core i7-10700KF scoring 4547 and the Intel Xeon E-2356G scoring 4548. The Intel part is 0% from the i7-10700KF and -0.1% from the Xeon, while the AMD is -0.3% from both. This indicates that both chips occupy the same performance tier as those older desktop parts. If the requirement is maximum benchmark scores, the Intel i5-1340P is the clear, if narrow, winner.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score, and by how much?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P has a higher average benchmark score of 4545, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748's 4532.

Q: In which tests does the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 win?

A: Based on the head-to-head data, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 does not win any of the six listed Cinebench tests. The Intel Core i5-1340P wins all six.

Q: What is the largest performance delta between the two processors in any single test?

A: The largest delta is 0.5%, which occurs in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where the Intel Core i5-1340P scores 223 versus the AMD's 222.

Q: How do these processors compare to the Intel Core i7-10700KF?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P has a 0% delta versus the Core i7-10700KF, meaning they have nearly identical average scores. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 is -0.3% behind the Core i7-10700KF.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i5-1340P supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 supports only DDR4.

Q: What is the difference in their process nodes?

A: The Intel Core i5-1340P is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 is built on a 7 nm process by TSMC.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their core specifications. The Intel Core i5-1340P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, whereas the AMD part has a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.25 GHz. Their TDPs also differ, with the Intel chip rated at 28 W and the AMD chip at 35 W. The Intel processor uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the AMD uses the AMD Socket FP6. The memory support is another key difference: the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip only supports DDR4. The Intel part does not support ECC memory, but the AMD part does. The PCIe support also differs, with the Intel offering Gen 4 with 20 Lanes (CPU only), while the AMD offers Gen 3 with 20 Lanes (CPU only). Finally, the Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $353, while the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

Architecturally, these are very different chips. The Intel Core i5-1340P is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-P codename, and is from the Core i5 (Raptor Lake-P) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748, in contrast, is based on the Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, from the Ryzen Embedded (Zen 2 (Renoir)) generation. It is built on a 7 nm process by TSMC, and it has 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. Its cache hierarchy is smaller per core, with 64 KB of L1, 512 KB of L2, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Its integrated graphics are Radeon Graphics with 448 shader processors. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory and has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which the Intel chip does not specify.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-1340P wins in raw compute performance across all tested Cinebench workloads. Its 0.3-0.5% leads in both single-core and multi-core tests suggest it is the better choice for applications that are sensitive to peak benchmark scores, such as content creation or rendering tasks where every point counts. The Intel chip's higher boost clock and larger L3 cache likely contribute to these wins. The Intel part also has the advantage of a lower 28 W TDP, which could be a win for mobile or compact system designs where thermal and power budgets are tight.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748, despite losing all benchmarks, has its own wins in the specification and architecture columns. Its 7 nm process node is more modern than Intel's 10 nm, and its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz could be advantageous for workloads that are consistently active rather than bursty. The AMD chip's support for ECC memory is a significant feature for embedded or server-like applications where data integrity is critical. Its higher TDP of 35 W suggests it may sustain its base clock for longer periods under sustained loads, even if its boost clock is lower. The AMD part also has a specified memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which is a concrete figure that the Intel pack does not provide. For a user prioritizing error-correcting memory or a more advanced process node with a higher base clock, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 presents a compelling case, despite the marginal benchmark deficit.