AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 vs Intel Core i5-1250P Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Intel Core i5-1250P present a fascinating study in contrasting design philosophies, yet their benchmark results are remarkably close. The data reveals a near-total dead heat across the Cinebench suite, with the AMD part taking a narrow but consistent lead in every single test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the V2748 scores 1579 against the i5-1250P’s 1573, a margin of just 0.4%. That same 0.4% delta repeats in R20 multicore (6580 vs 6556) and R23 multicore (15668 vs 15610). Single-core results are even tighter: both CPUs post identical 222 scores in R15, while the AMD chip edges ahead by 0.4% in R20 (929 vs 925) and R23 (2212 vs 2203). The average benchmark scores tell the same story—4532 for the V2748 versus 4515 for the i5-1250P, a difference of only 0.4%. Despite the Intel part’s higher core count and newer architecture, the Ryzen Embedded chip wins all six head-to-head comparisons, though by margins so slim they border on statistical noise.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 holds a marginal edge with an average benchmark score of 4532, compared to 4515 for the Intel Core i5-1250P. This represents a 0.4% advantage for the AMD part.

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: They are effectively identical. In Cinebench R15 single-core, both CPUs score exactly 222. In R20, the V2748 scores 929 versus 925 for the i5-1250P, and in R23, the margin is 2212 versus 2203—each a 0.4% difference in favor of AMD.

Q: Does the Intel chip’s higher core count translate to a multicore win?

A: No. Despite having 12 cores versus 8 for the AMD part, the i5-1250P loses every multicore test. The V2748 leads by 0.4% in R15 (1579 vs 1573), R20 (6580 vs 6556), and R23 (15668 vs 15610). The extra cores do not overcome the AMD chip’s per-core efficiency.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-1250P is rated at 28 watts. The Intel part consumes less power on paper, yet still trails in performance.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 includes ECC memory support. The Intel Core i5-1250P does not offer this feature, which is a notable advantage for reliability-focused embedded workloads.

Q: How do these chips rank against other CPUs?

A: Both processors sit at the 58th percentile among all CPUs. The V2748’s nearest rival is the i5-1250P itself, with a delta of 0.4%. The i5-1250P’s closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-12700TE, where it matches with a 0% delta.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear, if narrow, winner: the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 outperforms the Intel Core i5-1250P in every recorded test. The margins are tiny—0.4% across all Cinebench iterations—but they are consistent, giving AMD the win in all six head-to-head comparisons. For users prioritizing raw compute in multi-threaded workloads, the V2748’s 8 cores and 16 threads deliver 15668 in R23 multicore versus 15610 for Intel’s 12-core part. The single-core results are essentially a tie, with the V2748’s 2212 barely edging out 2203. However, the i5-1250P is not without merit. Its 28-watt TDP is lower than the V2748’s 35 watts, suggesting better energy efficiency per unit of performance, even if that performance is slightly lower. The Intel chip also supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part is limited to DDR4. The data does not support a choice based on performance alone—the V2748 wins outright—but the i5-1250P offers an alternative for power-constrained designs where the 7-watt TDP gap matters more than sub-1% performance differences.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their core configurations. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-1250P has 12 cores and 16 threads—both support 16 threads, but Intel achieves this with 4 more physical cores. Base clock speeds differ dramatically: the V2748 runs at 2.90 GHz, whereas the i5-1250P has a base clock of 1700.00 MHz, though the Intel chip boosts higher at 4.40 GHz versus 4.25 GHz for AMD. TDP ratings also differ, with the V2748 at 35 watts and the i5-1250P at 28 watts. The socket types are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FP6, while Intel uses BGA 1744. Memory support varies, with AMD supporting only DDR4 and Intel supporting both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but the V2748 lists a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the i5-1250P has no listed bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported only on the AMD part. PCIe generations differ—AMD offers Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD’s Radeon Graphics 448SP versus Intel’s Iris Xe 80EU.

Architecture Differences

The underlying architectures are from different eras and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 uses the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Renoir, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It contains 9,800 million transistors on a 156 mm² die. The Intel Core i5-1250P uses the Alder Lake architecture, codenamed Alder Lake-P, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 217 mm² and no listed transistor count. Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part’s larger cache is a direct result of its hybrid core design, which mixes performance and efficiency cores. The V2748’s Zen 2 architecture is older, but its 7 nm process gives it a transistor density advantage—9,800 million transistors in a smaller die. The i5-1250P’s 10 nm process is less dense, but its larger die accommodates more cores and cache. The release dates reflect this gap: the V2748 launched on 2020-11-09, while the i5-1250P launched on 2022-02-22. Both are currently in active production, but the AMD part targets the desktop embedded market, while the Intel part is a mobile processor.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 wins in every benchmark category, making it the default choice for compute-intensive tasks. Its multicore advantage, while slim, is consistent: 1579 versus 1573 in R15, 6580 versus 6556 in R20, and 15668 versus 15610 in R23. This makes it marginally better for rendering, compilation, and other heavily threaded workloads. The V2748 also wins on single-core performance, with identical 222 scores in R15 but slight leads of 4 points in R20 and 9 points in R23. For users who prioritize ECC memory support, the V2748 is the only option, making it suited for data-integrity-critical applications like servers or financial modeling. The Intel Core i5-1250P does not win any performance tests, but it has specific advantages in other areas. Its 28-watt TDP makes it more power-efficient on paper, which could be decisive in thermally constrained mobile or embedded designs. The Intel chip also supports DDR5 memory, offering a path to newer memory technology, and its PCIe Gen 4 interface doubles the bandwidth of the AMD part’s Gen 3, which matters for high-speed NVMe storage or discrete GPUs. The i5-1250P’s 12 cores may also be preferable for workloads that scale with core count but are not limited by per-core performance—though the data shows this is not the case in Cinebench. Ultimately, the V2748 wins on pure performance and reliability features, while the i5-1250P wins on power efficiency, memory flexibility, and modern connectivity.