AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Intel Core i7-3632QM Comparison

The Intel Core i7-3632QM and AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they come from different eras and design philosophies. The database places them at the same 34th percentile among all CPUs, with average benchmark scores of 1219 and 1196 respectively. Their head-to-head results show a split: AMD wins three of four tests, while Intel takes one decisive victory. The Intel chip is a mobile part from 2012, built on Ivy Bridge, while the AMD chip is a desktop embedded part from 2018, built on Zen. These differences in process, cache, and clock behavior drive the measured performance gaps.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B boosts to 3.60 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-3632QM reaches 3.20 GHz. That is a 0.40 GHz advantage for AMD.

Q: How do their L3 caches compare?

A: The Intel chip has 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD chip has 2 MB. Intel offers three times the L3 capacity.

Q: Which processor is built on a smaller manufacturing process?

A: Intel uses a 22 nm process, while AMD uses 14 nm. The smaller node gives AMD a denser transistor layout, though its die is larger at 210 mm² versus 160 mm².

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: Intel is rated at 35 W, AMD at 15 W. AMD draws less than half the thermal budget.

Q: Which has a higher single-core Cinebench R23 score?

A: AMD scores 841, Intel 569. AMD is 32.3% higher in that test.

Q: Which processor has more transistors?

A: AMD has 4,950 million transistors, Intel has 1,480 million. AMD’s count is more than three times higher.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same core and thread count: 4 cores and 8 threads. The underlying designs, however, are fundamentally different. Intel’s Ivy Bridge is a 22 nm part fabricated by Intel, with 1,480 million transistors on a 160 mm² die. AMD’s Zen, codenamed Great Horned Owl, is a 14 nm part from GlobalFoundries, with 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The cache hierarchy diverges sharply. Intel provides 64 KB of L1 and 256 KB of L2 per core, plus 6 MB of shared L3. AMD doubles L1 to 128 KB and L2 to 512 KB per core, but reduces shared L3 to 2 MB. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but AMD explicitly supports DDR4 while Intel’s memory support is not listed. Integrated graphics also differ: Intel HD 4000 versus Radeon Vega 8. The Intel part is a mobile chip, while AMD is a desktop embedded part. AMD’s production status is active; Intel’s is not listed. Release dates are 2012 for Intel and 2018 for AMD, a six-year gap that explains the architectural leap.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records four head-to-head Cinebench results. In Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD wins 654 to 406, meaning Intel is 37.9% lower. In R15 singlecore, AMD wins 128 to 57, a 55.5% deficit for Intel. The tables turn in Cinebench R23 multicore: Intel wins 4033 to 3160, a 27.6% advantage. But in R23 singlecore, AMD again takes the lead, 841 to 569, with Intel 32.3% lower. So AMD dominates three of four tests, with Intel’s only win coming in the newer multicore workload. The database also lists Intel scores in Cinebench R20 (1693 multicore, 238 singlecore) and Geekbench (2142 multicore, 613 singlecore), but AMD has no corresponding entries, so no direct comparison is possible. The pattern is clear: AMD’s per-thread performance is consistently stronger, while Intel’s larger L3 cache and older architecture still manage to win the R23 multicore test.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-3632QM | AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B |

| Base clock | 2.20 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) | AMD Socket FP5 |

| Architecture | Ivy Bridge | Zen |

| Process node | 22 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 1,480 million | 4,950 million |

| Die size | 160 mm² | 210 mm² |

| L1 cache (per core) | 64 KB | 128 KB |

| L2 cache (per core) | 256 KB | 512 KB |

| L3 cache (shared) | 6 MB | 2 MB |

| Memory support | Not listed | DDR4 |

| Integrated graphics | Intel HD 4000 | Radeon Vega 8 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2012-10-18 | 2018-02-20 |

| Production status | Not listed | Active |

Both have 4 cores, 8 threads, dual-channel memory, no ECC, and locked multipliers. The most consequential differences are the TDP (35 W vs 15 W), the boost clock (3.20 vs 3.60 GHz), and the cache layout (6 MB L3 vs 2 MB L3). AMD’s higher boost clock and larger per-core L1/L2 caches likely explain its single-core advantage, while Intel’s larger L3 may help in the R23 multicore test.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B wins three of the four head-to-head tests, including both single-core tests and the older R15 multicore test. Its single-core advantage is substantial: 55.5% in R15 and 32.3% in R23. It also does so at a much lower TDP of 15 W versus 35 W, and with a higher boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The Intel Core i7-3632QM, however, takes the Cinebench R23 multicore test by 27.6%, and it offers a larger 6 MB L3 cache. For users prioritizing the newer multicore workload, Intel is the pick. For everything else in the recorded benchmarks, AMD is ahead. The average scores are close (1219 vs 1196), and both sit at the 34th percentile, but the head-to-head results show AMD’s architecture delivers better per-thread performance and efficiency in most tests. The Intel part remains competitive in one specific workload, but the overall record favors AMD.