AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Intel Core i3-7300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a fascinating split between these two processors, with each claiming victory in different workloads. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B delivers a commanding performance, scoring 654 against the Intel Core i3-7300T's 354. This represents a 45.9% advantage for the AMD part, a substantial margin that reflects its additional cores and threads. The Ryzen Embedded's 4 cores and 8 threads clearly overwhelm the Intel's 2 cores and 4 threads in this older benchmark iteration.

However, the tables turn dramatically in the Cinebench R23 multicore test. Here, the Intel Core i3-7300T posts a score of 3519, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B manages 3160. The Intel processor takes an 11.4% lead in this newer benchmark version. This reversal is notable because it shows the Kaby Lake architecture holding its own against the Zen-based competitor in a more modern rendering workload, despite having half the physical cores.

The single-core results further complicate the picture. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B achieves 841 points, while the Intel Core i3-7300T scores only 496. That is a 41% deficit for the Intel part. The Ryzen's boost clock of 3.60 GHz, combined with the Zen architecture's efficiency, produces a decisive win in lightly threaded tasks. The Intel's fixed 3.50 GHz clock, with no boost capability, cannot match this output.

Overall, the head-to-head tally shows the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B winning 2 out of 3 benchmark comparisons. Yet the picture is more nuanced than a simple win count. The Intel processor's victory in the R23 multicore test suggests that its per-core efficiency and shared cache design translate well to certain modern workloads. The AMD processor's wins span both an older multicore test and a newer single-core test, indicating broad strength across different types of rendering tasks.

When examining the average benchmark scores, the two processors sit remarkably close. The Intel Core i3-7300T records an average score of 1211, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B averages 1196. That difference of only 15 points, roughly 1.3%, places them in the same performance tier. Both processors fall at the 34th percentile among all CPUs in the database, confirming their positioning as entry-level to mid-range desktop parts. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the Intel Xeon E5645 with an identical average score of 1211, and the Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 at 1212, showing a 0.1% gap. The AMD part's closest competitors include the AMD Opteron 3365 at 1194, a 0.2% difference, and the Intel Core i3-4170 at 1193, also a 0.2% gap.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B demonstrates its strengths in scenarios that leverage multiple cores and threads. The Cinebench R15 multicore result, with a 45.9% lead over the Intel part, indicates that older rendering applications and similarly threaded workloads will favor the AMD processor. Its 4 cores and 8 threads provide a substantial advantage in video encoding, 3D rendering, and other parallel processing tasks that scale well with additional execution resources. The single-core performance in Cinebench R23, where the AMD part leads by 41%, also positions it well for everyday desktop responsiveness, including web browsing, office applications, and light photo editing where single-thread speed matters.

The Intel Core i3-7300T claims its territory in the Cinebench R23 multicore test, where it outperforms the AMD processor by 11.4%. This result suggests that newer rendering engines, which may be optimized for different cache hierarchies or instruction sets, can extract more performance from the Intel's Kaby Lake architecture. The Intel part's 4 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to the AMD's 2 MB, likely contributes to this advantage. Additionally, the Intel processor's 35W TDP, while higher than the AMD's 15W, indicates it can sustain higher power draw for bursty workloads, which may benefit certain multithreaded applications.

For users prioritizing power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a clear edge with its 15W TDP, less than half of the Intel's 35W. This makes the AMD part suitable for compact systems, embedded applications, and scenarios where thermal management is critical. The Intel part, with its higher TDP, might be better suited for desktop builds with active cooling solutions where power draw is less of a concern. The integrated graphics also differ: Intel offers HD 630, while AMD provides Radeon Vega 8, though benchmark data does not quantify the graphics performance difference.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The Intel Core i3-7300T is built on Kaby Lake, a 14 nm process manufactured by Intel itself. This architecture uses 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and no boost clock. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR4 with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1151 and supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It does not support ECC memory and is not multiplier unlocked.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B belongs to the Zen generation, also fabricated on a 14 nm process but by GlobalFoundries. This architecture provides 4 cores and 8 threads, a substantial increase over the Intel part. The base clock is 2000.00 MHz, with a boost clock of 3.60 GHz, allowing dynamic frequency scaling. The cache configuration includes 128 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 2 MB of shared L3 cache, which is half the Intel's shared cache. Memory support is also DDR4 with a dual-channel bus, though the memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket FP5 and integrates Radeon Vega 8 graphics. It also does not support ECC memory and is not multiplier unlocked.

The transistor count and die size differ notably. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B contains 4,950 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core i3-7300T does not have recorded transistor or die size data in the database. The AMD's larger die and higher transistor count reflect the additional cores and integrated Vega graphics. The AMD processor's release date is later, coming in February 2018, while the Intel part launched in January 2017. Both processors are currently marked as active in production.

The memory bandwidth figure of 38.4 GB/s for the Intel part suggests robust memory performance, though the AMD's bandwidth is not specified. The PCIe support on the Intel side, with 16 Gen 3 lanes, provides more expansion options compared to the AMD part, which has no recorded PCIe information. These architectural differences help explain the benchmark outcomes: the AMD's additional cores and threads boost its R15 multicore score, while the Intel's larger shared cache and higher base clock contribute to its R23 multicore performance.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear recommendation based on workload priorities. For users running older rendering applications or multithreaded tasks that scale with core count, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is the stronger choice. Its 45.9% lead in Cinebench R15 multicore and 41% lead in R23 single-core demonstrate broad capability across both parallel and single-threaded scenarios. The 4 cores and 8 threads provide headroom for multitasking, content creation, and embedded workloads that benefit from additional execution units. The lower 15W TDP also makes it attractive for power-constrained designs.

The Intel Core i3-7300T's advantage appears in newer multicore workloads, as evidenced by its 11.4% win in Cinebench R23 multicore. This suggests that applications built around modern rendering engines may run better on the Intel platform. The 4 MB shared L3 cache and the Kaby Lake architecture's efficiency likely drive this result. For users whose software stack is optimized for Intel architectures or who require the higher memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, the Intel part offers a compelling case.

Given the average benchmark scores are nearly identical, with the Intel at 1211 and the AMD at 1196, both processors deliver similar overall performance. The deciding factor should be the specific application mix. If the workload leans toward legacy multithreaded software, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B wins. If the workload favors newer rendering engines or requires Intel-specific optimizations, the Core i3-7300T is preferable. Neither processor supports ECC memory or unlocked multipliers, so those features do not influence the decision. The choice ultimately comes down to whether the user prioritizes the AMD's core count and single-core speed or the Intel's newer benchmark performance and cache capacity.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multicore score in Cinebench R15?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 654, which is 45.9% higher than the Intel Core i3-7300T's 354 in Cinebench R15 multicore.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-7300T perform in Cinebench R23 multicore compared to the AMD?

A: The Intel Core i3-7300T scores 3519, an 11.4% advantage over the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 3160 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B scores 841, which is 41% higher than the Intel Core i3-7300T's 496 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core i3-7300T has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these processors?

A: The Intel Core i3-7300T has a TDP of 35W, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a TDP of 15W.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, neither the Intel Core i3-7300T nor the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B supports ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger shared L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i3-7300T has 4 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B has 2 MB of shared L3 cache.