AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs Intel Core i7-8705G Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a consistent pattern: the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 wins every recorded Cinebench test against the Intel Core i7-8705G. This is a clean sweep, with six wins and no victories for the Intel part.

The smallest margin comes in Cinebench R15 multicore, where the AMD scores 726 against Intel's 651, a lead of 11.5%. The same test in single-core shows the AMD at 102 versus 91, a 12.1% advantage. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD posts 3029 in multicore compared to 2714, 11.6% ahead, and 427 versus 383 in single-core, another 11.5% edge.

Cinebench R23 repeats the pattern. The AMD reaches 7213 in multicore, while the Intel manages 6464, a gap of 11.6%. Single-core R23 shows 1018 against 912, also 11.6%. What is notable is the consistency: the AMD leads by roughly 11.5% to 12.1% across every workload, regardless of core count scaling or single-thread intensity. This suggests the AMD's advantage is not workload-specific but rather a general performance edge.

The delta percentages are remarkably uniform. Five of the six tests land between 11.5% and 11.6%, with only the R15 single-core test reaching 12.1%. This uniformity points to a stable architectural advantage rather than a boost clock spike or a test-specific quirk. The AMD's lower base clock of 3.35 GHz versus Intel's 3.10 GHz, combined with its higher boost behavior in these tests, appears to translate directly into a consistent lead.

Neither processor has a dominant single-thread spike that would indicate a turbo advantage for one side. The AMD wins single-core tests by the same margin as multicore tests, which is unusual. Many processors show different scaling between single and multi-threaded workloads, but here the ratio stays flat.

Average benchmark scores reinforce the picture. The AMD carries an average score of 2086, while the Intel sits at 2058. The AMD's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i3-9350KF at 2082 (0.2% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X at 2094 (0.4% ahead). The Intel i7-8705G's closest competitor is the Intel Core i3-10105T at 2058 (0% delta), with the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G at 2059 just 0.1% ahead. Both processors land at the 46th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they occupy a similar tier in the overall performance distribution.

For practical use, the data shows that in pure CPU rendering workloads, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 will finish roughly 11% faster than the Intel Core i7-8705G. That is a meaningful difference for batch rendering or compilation tasks that run for hours. The Intel does have a higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz versus 3.70 GHz, but the recorded benchmarks show it cannot translate that peak frequency into a win in any of the six tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 scores 7213, which is 11.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-8705G's 6464.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-8705G faster in any benchmark?

A: No. The recorded data shows the AMD wins all six head-to-head tests, including every single-core and multicore Cinebench run.

Q: How close are these two CPUs in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD averages 2086, while the Intel averages 2058. Both sit at the 46th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest margin is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the AMD leads by 12.1% (102 versus 91). All other tests fall between 11.5% and 11.6%.

Q: Does the Intel processor have any advantage in memory bandwidth?

A: No. The AMD supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel also supports DDR4 but with 38.4 GB/s. The AMD has a higher rated bandwidth.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-8705G does not.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for users who prioritize raw CPU performance: the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544. It wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison, with margins that stay consistently above 11%. The average benchmark score also favors the AMD, 2086 versus 2058, even though both processors land at the same 46th percentile.

The Intel Core i7-8705G does have a higher boost clock at 4.10 GHz, but the recorded performance does not reflect that advantage. In every Cinebench test, the AMD finishes ahead, including single-core tests where boost clocks typically matter most. The Intel also carries a higher TDP of 65 watts against the AMD's 45 watts, meaning it draws more power while delivering less performance in these workloads.

For a system builder choosing between these two, the AMD is the better performer in every measured category. The Intel is an end-of-life mobile part, while the AMD remains in active production and offers ECC memory support, a feature the Intel lacks. The AMD also provides more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8) and a higher memory bandwidth rating.

The only scenario where the Intel might be considered is if a specific motherboard or system design requires its Intel BGA 2270 socket, but from a pure performance standpoint, the data shows no reason to pick it over the AMD.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 has a base clock of 3.35 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-8705G starts at 3.10 GHz. The Intel has a higher boost clock at 4.10 GHz compared to the AMD's 3.70 GHz. Both have 4 cores and 8 threads, so thread counts are identical.

The AMD carries a 45 watt TDP, while the Intel is rated at 65 watts. The AMD uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel uses Intel BGA 2270. The AMD is a desktop market segment part, while the Intel is classified as mobile. The AMD is still in active production, whereas the Intel is end-of-life.

Memory bandwidth differs significantly: the AMD is rated at 51.2 GB/s, the Intel at 38.4 GB/s. Both support DDR4 and dual-channel memory, but only the AMD supports ECC. The AMD provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel provides only 8.

The AMD has a release date of 2022-09-29, while the Intel launched on 2018-01-06. The AMD's part numbers are YE2544C3T4MFH and YE2544C3T4MFHA, while the Intel's is SR3RK. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses the Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel Core i7-8705G uses the Kaby Lake architecture, codenamed Kaby Lake G, built on a 14 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 125 mm², and no transistor count is recorded.

Cache layouts differ between the two. The AMD provides 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel has twice the L3 cache, but the AMD's larger L1 and L2 per core may help in latency-sensitive workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD includes Radeon Vega 8 graphics, while the Intel includes Intel HD Graphics 630. The AMD's Vega 8 is a more capable integrated solution, though the recorded data does not include specific graphics benchmarks for either part.

The AMD is part of the Ryzen Embedded 2000 series, with a Zen+ generation label. The Intel is a Core i7 Kaby Lake-G part. The AMD's memory bandwidth advantage of 51.2 GB/s against 38.4 GB/s likely stems from its memory controller design, which supports ECC and higher throughput. The Intel's smaller 125 mm² die reflects its older 14 nm process, while the AMD's larger 210 mm² die includes more transistors on a denser 12 nm node.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 wins in every recorded benchmark category. It is the choice for multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and code compilation, where its 11.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore translates to faster completion times. Its ECC memory support makes it suitable for data integrity-sensitive applications such as file servers, NAS builds, or scientific computing where memory errors are unacceptable.

The AMD also wins in single-threaded performance, which matters for everyday responsiveness, legacy applications, and lightly threaded software. A 12.1% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core is not trivial for users running older programs that only use one or two threads.

The Intel Core i7-8705G does not win any recorded benchmark. However, its higher boost clock of 4.10 GHz indicates it may reach higher peak frequencies in short bursts, even though the recorded Cinebench results do not show this translating into a win. It is an end-of-life mobile part, so it may still appear in existing laptop or compact system designs that require the Intel BGA 2270 socket.

The Intel does have more L3 cache at 8 MB versus 4 MB, which could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads, but the recorded data shows no benchmark where this advantage materializes into a win. Its lower memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s and lack of ECC support make it less suitable for memory-intensive or reliability-focused builds.

For a new system, the AMD is the stronger pick across the board. For maintaining or repairing an existing Intel BGA 2270 platform, the Intel remains a viable drop-in replacement, but it will deliver less performance than the AMD in every measured test. The practical advice is simple: if you are choosing between these two for a new build, the data supports the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 without qualification.