AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs Intel Core i7-7700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clean sweep for the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 across all six Cinebench comparisons. The R2544 wins every multi-core and single-core test, with deltas that are remarkably consistent, ranging from 12.1% to 12.5%. This uniformity suggests a systematic performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD part scores 7213 against the Intel Core i7-7700T's 6410, a 12.5% lead. The single-core R23 result follows the same pattern: 1018 for AMD versus 905 for Intel, again a 12.5% delta. The R15 and R20 suites mirror this trend. R15 multi-core shows 726 versus 646 (12.4%), and R15 single-core shows 102 versus 91 (12.1%). R20 multi-core lands at 3029 versus 2692 (12.5%), while R20 single-core is 427 versus 380 (12.4%).

The consistency of the margin is notable. In every generation of Cinebench, the relative gap holds steady near 12.5%. This indicates the AMD processor maintains its advantage across different rendering engines and instruction mixes. The Intel part never closes the gap in any test, and the largest margin is actually in R23 multi-core and R20 multi-core, both at 12.5%.

Looking at the broader database context, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 sits at the 46th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2086. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-9350KF (2082, 0.2% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (2094, 0.4% behind). The Intel Core i7-7700T, meanwhile, sits at the 45th percentile with an average score of 2039. Its closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-3960X (2037, 0.1% ahead). The gap between the two CPUs in average score is 47 points, which aligns with the consistent Cinebench deltas.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 wins every benchmark category recorded in this comparison. There are no tests where the Intel Core i7-7700T posts a higher score. This makes the use-case split straightforward: the AMD part is the stronger choice for any workload represented by Cinebench, which includes 3D rendering, animation, and general multi-threaded compute tasks.

For single-threaded tasks, the R2544 leads by a consistent 12.1% to 12.5%. This covers legacy R15 single-core, where the AMD scores 102 versus 91, and modern R23 single-core, where it scores 1018 versus 905. Users running lightly threaded applications, such as older games or single-threaded productivity tools, will see a measurable advantage on the AMD side.

For multi-threaded workloads, the lead is equally consistent. The R2544's R23 multi-core score of 7213 is 12.5% higher than the 6410 posted by the Intel part. This applies to video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and compilation tasks where all eight threads are utilized. The AMD processor's advantage holds across every Cinebench version, indicating that the performance gap is not sensitive to the specific rendering algorithm used.

The Intel Core i7-7700T does have a higher boost clock (3.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz) and a larger L3 cache (8 MB versus 4 MB), yet these advantages do not translate into any benchmark win. The database shows zero wins for the Intel part across all six head-to-head tests. Its lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts suggests better power efficiency, but in raw performance, the AMD processor dominates every measured category.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different architectural generations and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 uses the Zen+ architecture on a 12 nm process from GlobalFoundries, with the codename Picasso. It belongs to the 2000 series of Ryzen Embedded processors. The Intel Core i7-7700T uses the Kaby Lake architecture on a 14 nm process from Intel, with the codename Kaby Lake.

Both CPUs have 4 cores and 8 threads, so the core count does not explain the performance gap. The AMD part has a higher base clock at 3.35 GHz versus 2.90 GHz, but the Intel part has a higher boost clock at 3.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz. Despite the lower boost, the AMD part still wins all single-threaded tests, suggesting that the Zen+ architecture delivers more instructions per clock in these workloads.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD R2544 has 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel i7-7700T has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has twice the L3 capacity, yet the AMD part still wins all multi-threaded tests. This indicates that the R2544's memory sub-system and core efficiency compensate for the smaller L3.

Memory bandwidth also favors AMD. The R2544 supports dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel part supports dual-channel DDR4 with 38.4 GB/s. The 33% higher bandwidth on the AMD side likely contributes to its multi-threaded advantage, especially in memory-intensive rendering workloads. Both CPUs support PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The AMD R2544 includes Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, while the Intel part includes HD 630. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. In terms of physical characteristics, the AMD part is built on a 12 nm node with 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1151. The AMD part was released in September 2022, while the Intel part was released in January 2017. Both CPUs are currently marked as Active in production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 scores 1018, which is 12.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-7700T's 905.

Q: How much larger is the AMD processor's memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD R2544 supports 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel i7-7700T supports 38.4 GB/s, a difference of 12.8 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-7700T support ECC memory?

A: No, the database records ECC memory support as false for the Intel part. The AMD R2544 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two CPUs?

A: The AMD R2544 has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel i7-7700T has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel part consumes 10 watts less.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-7700T has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 has 4 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD R2544 has an average benchmark score of 2086, while the Intel i7-7700T has an average score of 2039. The AMD part is 47 points higher.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture: the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 outperforms the Intel Core i7-7700T in every recorded benchmark. The win count is 6 to 0, and the margins are consistent at approximately 12.5% across all Cinebench versions. For workloads that rely on CPU rendering, video encoding, or any multi-threaded compute, the AMD part is the stronger choice.

The Intel Core i7-7700T does offer a lower TDP of 35 watts versus 45 watts, which could be relevant for thermally constrained systems. It also has a larger L3 cache of 8 MB versus 4 MB and a higher boost clock of 3.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz. However, these advantages do not produce any benchmark wins. The Intel part's single-core performance is consistently behind the AMD part, and its multi-core performance lags by the same margin.

The AMD R2544 also brings ECC memory support, which the Intel part lacks. This makes the AMD processor more suitable for reliability-focused applications such as servers or workstations where data integrity is critical. The higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s further supports memory-intensive workloads.

For users who prioritize raw performance in rendering and compute tasks, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the clear winner. For users who prioritize lower power consumption and are willing to accept a 12.5% performance deficit, the Intel Core i7-7700T remains a viable option. The database percentile rankings place the AMD part at the 46th percentile and the Intel part at the 45th percentile, confirming that both are mid-range performers overall, but the AMD part holds a measurable edge in every measured category.