AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 vs Intel Core i3-10105T Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 and Intel Core i3-10105T are both 4-core, 8-thread desktop processors, yet benchmark results show a clear and consistent performance gap. The R2544 wins all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, with margins ranging from 8.4% to 8.5% across both single-core and multi-core tests. While the Intel part offers a higher boost clock and a lower TDP, the data indicates that the AMD processor delivers superior compute performance across every measured workload. The Intel Core i3-10105T is the appropriate choice for systems prioritizing power efficiency and a familiar LGA 1200 platform, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 is the pick for raw multi-threaded and single-threaded throughput, especially in embedded applications requiring ECC memory support.

The Verdict

Benchmark data strongly favors the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544. It outperforms the Intel Core i3-10105T in every single Cinebench test, achieving an 8.4% lead in multi-core workloads and an 8.5% lead in single-core workloads. The R2544’s average benchmark score of 2086 also edges out the i3-10105T’s 2058, placing both CPUs at the 46th percentile of all processors. For users whose primary concern is raw compute performance in rendering or CPU-intensive tasks, the R2544 is the clear winner based on this data.

However, the Intel Core i3-10105T is not without merit. It carries a 35W TDP compared to the R2544’s 45W TDP, making it a more power-efficient option for thermally constrained systems. The i3-10105T also supports a boost clock of 3.90 GHz versus the R2544’s 3.70 GHz, although this does not translate into a benchmark victory. The Intel processor is the better choice for builds where power draw is critical and the small performance deficit is acceptable. For systems requiring ECC memory support, the AMD R2544 is the only option, as the i3-10105T does not support ECC. The verdict is simple: choose AMD for performance and ECC, choose Intel for lower power consumption.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 is based on the Zen+ architecture (codename Picasso) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It features 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 3.35 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. The R2544 has a 45W TDP and uses the AMD Socket FP5. Its cache hierarchy includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The processor integrates Radeon Vega 8 graphics and supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a key feature for embedded and reliability-focused applications.

In contrast, the Intel Core i3-10105T is based on the Comet Lake architecture (codename Comet Lake-R) and uses Intel’s 14 nm process. It also has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a higher boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The TDP is lower at 35W, and it fits the Intel Socket 1200. The cache configuration is different: 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a larger shared 6 MB L3 cache. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 630, and memory support is dual-channel DDR4 with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, which is lower than the AMD part. The i3-10105T does not support ECC memory. Both processors use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, but the architectural differences in process node and cache design likely contribute to the performance gap seen in benchmarks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 wins every test. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the R2544 scores 726 against the i3-10105T’s 670, an 8.4% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar pattern, with 102 vs 94, an 8.5% lead for AMD. This consistency continues in Cinebench R20, where the R2544 scores 3029 multi-core and 427 single-core, versus 2795 and 394 for the Intel part, respectively—again an 8.4% margin.

The largest absolute gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the R2544 scores 7213 compared to the i3-10105T’s 6656. This 557-point difference underscores the AMD chip’s stronger multi-threaded performance, which is notable given both processors have the same core and thread count. The R23 single-core test shows 1018 vs 939, a 79-point difference. The AMD processor also holds a slight edge in average benchmark score, 2086 vs 2058, although both sit at the 46th percentile. The Intel i3-10105T does have additional Geekbench results—3649 multi-core and 1265 single-core—but these are not part of the head-to-head comparison, as the R2544 lacks Geekbench data. Within the six Cinebench tests, the AMD R2544 wins all, with a consistent deltaPct of 8.4-8.5%, indicating a systematic performance advantage rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock, and does it matter?

A: The Intel Core i3-10105T has a higher boost clock of 3.90 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544’s 3.70 GHz. However, benchmark results show the AMD processor still wins all single-core Cinebench tests by 8.4-8.5%, indicating that the higher boost clock on the Intel part does not translate into a performance advantage.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i3-10105T does not. This makes the AMD processor the only option for systems requiring error-correcting memory.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 has an average benchmark score of 2086, while the Intel Core i3-10105T scores 2058. Both processors are at the 46th percentile of all CPUs, but the AMD part holds a slight edge.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i3-10105T has a larger shared L3 cache of 6 MB, compared to the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544’s 4 MB. Despite this cache advantage, the AMD processor performs better in all benchmark tests.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Intel Core i3-10105T has a lower TDP of 35W, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 has a TDP of 45W. This makes the Intel processor more power-efficient, which may be relevant for systems with tight thermal budgets.

Q: Are both processors currently in production?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 and the Intel Core i3-10105T have an active production status. The AMD part was released in late 2022, while the Intel part was released earlier in 2021.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2544 wins in every benchmark category included in the comparison. It is the superior choice for Cinebench workloads, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded. The 8.4% margins in multi-core tests like R20 (3029 vs 2795) and R23 (7213 vs 6656) make it the preferred processor for rendering, video encoding, and other CPU-intensive tasks where every bit of throughput counts. Its support for ECC memory is a decisive factor for embedded systems, servers, or workstations where data integrity is paramount. The R2544’s higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s versus the i3-10105T’s 42.7 GB/s also gives it an edge in memory-heavy applications, although this is not directly measured in the benchmark data.

The Intel Core i3-10105T, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has its own strengths. Its 35W TDP is significantly lower than the AMD part’s 45W, making it a better fit for passively cooled or power-constrained systems. The higher boost clock of 3.90 GHz could be beneficial in short, bursty workloads that are not captured by sustained Cinebench runs. The larger 6 MB L3 cache might also help in certain cache-sensitive applications, though the benchmark data does not show this benefiting the Intel part in Cinebench. For users already invested in the LGA 1200 platform, the i3-10105T offers a straightforward upgrade path, but the performance data clearly favors AMD in absolute terms. The Intel processor’s launch MSRP is $134, which can be stated once, but the analysis here focuses on benchmark results rather than cost considerations.