AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 vs Intel Core i3-1315UE Comparison

The Intel Core i3-1315UE and AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 are two 15-watt processors aimed at compact, power-conscious systems, but they deliver nearly identical performance despite their architectural differences. Benchmark data shows the Intel part wins all six head-to-head Cinebench comparisons, yet the margins are razor-thin, with the largest lead being just 1.2% in a single-core test. Both chips land at the 41st percentile among all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores sit within 9 points of each other (1739 vs. 1730). This is a matchup where the numbers tell a story of near-parity, so the deciding factors come down to platform features, memory support, and specific workload characteristics rather than raw speed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-1315UE sweeps every benchmark in the comparison, but the victories are narrow across the board. In Cinebench R15 multicore, Intel scores 606 against AMD’s 603, a 0.5% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows Intel at 85 versus 84, a 1.2% lead — the largest delta in the entire head-to-head set. Moving to Cinebench R20, Intel posts 2525 in multicore while AMD trails at 2513, again a 0.5% gap, and the single-core R20 result is 356 to 354, a 0.6% edge for Intel.

The R23 tests follow the same pattern. Intel’s multicore score of 6013 beats AMD’s 5984 by 0.5%, and the single-core result of 849 versus 844 gives Intel a 0.6% lead. Across all six benchmarks, Intel’s average advantage is roughly half a percent, which is within run-to-run variance for most workloads. The data indicates that neither chip has a meaningful performance edge in Cinebench; the Intel part consistently finishes first, but the margins are so small that they would be imperceptible in real-world use.

Looking at the broader context, both processors sit at the 41st percentile globally, and their nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-10100 (avg score 1742) and AMD Ryzen 3 4300U (avg score 1742), both of which are within 0.2% of the Intel i3-1315UE’s 1739 average. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514’s 1730 average places it just below the Intel part, with its closest competitor being the AMD Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE at 1722 (0.5% lower) and the Intel Core i7-4860HQ at 1720 (0.6% lower). These figures reinforce that both chips are mid-pack performers, not outliers in either direction.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the Intel Core i3-1315UE is the faster processor, winning all six head-to-head benchmarks. However, the margins are so slim — never exceeding 1.2% — that performance alone cannot justify choosing one over the other. The Intel part offers a 0.5% multicore advantage in R23 and a 0.6% single-core lead in the same test, but these differences are statistically negligible for most applications.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 counters with platform advantages that the benchmarks do not capture. It supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip lacks, and it provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only) versus Intel’s 8 Gen 4 lanes. For embedded applications where data integrity and peripheral connectivity matter more than a fraction of a percent in Cinebench, the AMD part may be the more appropriate choice. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock (2.10 GHz vs. 1.20 GHz) and a larger transistor count (4,940 million vs. no data for Intel), though its boost clock is lower (3.70 GHz vs. 4.50 GHz).

The verdict splits cleanly: if the workload is pure compute and the software is single-threaded, the Intel part’s 4.50 GHz boost clock and 1.2% single-core R15 lead give it a slight edge. If the system requires ECC memory, more PCIe lanes, or a proven embedded pedigree (the AMD part belongs to the Ryzen Embedded 2000 series), the AMD chip wins despite its benchmark deficits. Neither chip is a clear winner; the choice depends entirely on the system’s secondary requirements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from entirely different design philosophies and process nodes. The Intel Core i3-1315UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-U, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It features 6 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, but does not support ECC.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 is based on Zen+ architecture, codenamed Picasso, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. The cache layout differs significantly: 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and only 4 MB of shared L3. AMD’s chip supports DDR4 only (dual-channel, 42.7 GB/s bandwidth) and includes ECC memory support. AMD also lists 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die, whereas Intel provides no transistor or die size data.

The integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU, while AMD pairs the R2514 with Radeon Vega 8. The PCIe support also diverges, with Intel offering 8 lanes of Gen 4 and AMD offering 16 lanes of Gen 3 (both CPU-only). These architectural choices reflect different target markets: Intel’s newer node and higher boost clock aim at bursty, single-threaded performance, while AMD’s larger L1 cache (96 KB vs. 80 KB per core) and ECC support target reliability-conscious embedded deployments.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ in several key specifications, starting with core count: Intel has 6 cores versus AMD’s 4, though both support 8 threads. Base clocks are notably different, with AMD at 2.10 GHz and Intel at 1.20 GHz — a 0.90 GHz gap in AMD’s favor. The boost clocks reverse that trend, with Intel at 4.50 GHz and AMD at 3.70 GHz, a 0.80 GHz advantage for Intel.

The process node favors Intel (10 nm vs. 12 nm), as does the L3 cache (10 MB vs. 4 MB). AMD counters with a larger L1 cache per core (96 KB vs. 80 KB) and a larger L2 cache per core (512 KB vs. 1.25 MB — wait, Intel’s L2 is larger per core at 1.25 MB). AMD’s L2 is 512 KB per core, so Intel wins on L2 as well. AMD’s advantage lies in memory bandwidth (42.7 GB/s, a figure Intel does not list) and ECC support, which Intel lacks. The socket types differ (Intel BGA 1744 vs. AMD Socket FP5), and the market segments differ (Mobile vs. Desktop). AMD’s part numbers are listed as YE2514C4T4MFH and YE2514C4T4MFHA, while Intel’s is not provided. Both have a 15 W TDP and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Release dates differ: Intel launched January 2023, AMD in September 2022.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i3-1315UE scores 849 versus AMD’s 844, a 0.6% lead. The same pattern holds in R15 (85 vs. 84, 1.2% lead) and R20 (356 vs. 354, 0.6% lead).

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i3-1315UE does not. This is a key differentiator for embedded systems requiring error correction.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multicore performance?

A: Intel wins all three multicore tests: R15 (606 vs. 603, 0.5%), R20 (2525 vs. 2513, 0.5%), and R23 (6013 vs. 5984, 0.5%). The margins are consistent but minimal.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: Intel has 6 cores and 8 threads, while AMD has 4 cores and 8 threads. Despite fewer cores, AMD’s higher base clock (2.10 GHz vs. 1.20 GHz) helps it stay close in benchmarks.

Q: Which chip has more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514 offers 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core i3-1315UE offers 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). AMD provides more lanes, though Intel’s are a generation newer.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: Intel’s average is 1739 and AMD’s is 1730, a difference of 9 points (0.5%). Both sit at the 41st percentile among all CPUs, indicating they occupy the same performance tier.