CPU Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the clear winner in every single benchmark comparison against the Intel Xeon E-2104G, but the margins are remarkably tight. Across all six Cinebench tests, the AMD part never leads by more than 1.4%, making this a statistical tie in real-world terms despite the clean sweep. The data shows a consistent pattern: the R2314 takes all six wins, while the Xeon E-2104G records zero victories, yet the performance gap is so narrow that it falls well within typical run-to-run variance. For buyers, this means the decision comes down to platform features and power characteristics rather than raw compute speed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin of victory for the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 comes in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, where it scores 69 against the Intel Xeon E-2104G’s 68, a delta of -1.4%. This is the only test where the gap exceeds one percentage point, and even then, a single point separates the two processors. In the R15 multi-core test, the R2314 posts 493 versus 488, a -1% difference. The pattern holds in newer benchmarks: R20 multi-core shows 2055 against 2035 (-1%), while R20 single-core shows 289 versus 287 (-0.7%).

The Cinebench R23 results reinforce the same story. In multi-core, the R2314 scores 4893, beating the Xeon’s 4847 by -0.9%. Single-core R23 sees the AMD chip at 690 against 684, also -0.9%. What is notable is the consistency of these deltas, they hover in the -0.7% to -1.4% range across all tests, suggesting the AMD part has a small but reproducible edge in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The average benchmark score tells a similar tale: the R2314 averages 1415, while the E-2104G averages 1402, a difference of just 13 points.

Looking at the broader competitive landscape, both processors sit at the 37th percentile of all CPUs, meaning they land in the same performance tier overall. The Xeon E-2104G’s nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 (avg score 1401, delta 0.1%) and the Intel Pentium Gold G7400TE (avg score 1404, delta -0.2%), placing it in a tight cluster of similar-performing chips. The Ryzen R2314’s rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and Intel Core i5-4460, both with identical 1415 average scores, confirming that it trades blows with a slightly higher tier of processors. The data indicates that while the AMD part wins every head-to-head, neither chip pulls away from the other in a way that would dictate a purchase decision based on performance alone.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Xeon E-2104G uses the Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process node, fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 126 mm². The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 employs the Zen+ architecture, specifically the Picasso codename, built on a 12 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with a substantially larger die at 210 mm² and 4,940 million transistors. The AMD chip’s larger die and newer process node contribute to its slight performance edge, though the Intel part’s smaller die suggests greater manufacturing efficiency.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Xeon E-2104G offers 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with a shared 8 MB L3 cache. The R2314 provides more generous per-core allocations: 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2, but only 4 MB of shared L3. This means the Intel chip has twice the L3 cache, which can benefit workloads with large working sets, while the AMD part’s larger L1 and L2 caches improve per-core data access. Both support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses and identical 42.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, and both feature ECC memory support, making them suitable for reliability-focused deployments.

The integrated graphics differ as well. Intel pairs the E-2104G with UHD Graphics P630, while AMD equips the R2314 with Radeon Vega 6. Both processors run on PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, so expansion capabilities are equivalent. Clock speeds tell a more nuanced story: the Intel part has a fixed base clock of 3.20 GHz with no boost capability, while the AMD chip runs at a 2.10 GHz base but boosts up to 3.50 GHz. The Intel’s higher sustained clock helps it stay competitive despite the AMD’s boost headroom.

Power and thermals present the starkest contrast. The Xeon E-2104G carries a 65 W TDP, while the Ryzen R2314 sips power at just 15 W, a 50 W difference. This makes the AMD part dramatically more efficient, especially for embedded or fanless designs. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 1151, whereas the R2314 fits AMD Socket FP5, so motherboard compatibility is mutually exclusive. The Intel chip is end-of-life, released in July 2018, while the AMD part remains active, having launched in June 2022.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 as the superior choice for almost any application, but the reasons have more to do with efficiency and longevity than raw speed. Benchmark results show the AMD part wins all six Cinebench tests, yet the maximum advantage is 1.4%, which translates to negligible real-world differences. The 15 W TDP versus 65 W is the decisive factor, the R2314 delivers essentially identical performance at less than a quarter of the power draw. This makes it the clear pick for embedded systems, industrial PCs, or any deployment where heat dissipation and power budgets matter.

The Intel Xeon E-2104G retains a niche appeal for users who prioritize its 8 MB L3 cache and higher base clock of 3.20 GHz. For workloads that are sensitive to cache size rather than raw throughput, the extra 4 MB of L3 could provide a measurable advantage, though the benchmark data does not capture such scenarios. Additionally, the Intel part’s 2018 release date means it is end-of-life, which may appeal to organizations standardizing on older platforms, but the AMD chip’s active production status ensures better long-term availability. The Xeon’s launch MSRP is $193, which can be stated once as a reference point, but no pricing comparison is warranted given the R2314 has no listed MSRP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2104G | AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | None | 3.50 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | AMD Socket FP5 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Zen+ (Picasso) |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | GlobalFoundries |

| Die Size | 126 mm² | 210 mm² |

| Transistors | Not listed | 4,940 million |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 96 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB per core | 512 KB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 4 MB shared |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon Vega 6 |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Desktop |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2018-07-11 | 2022-06-20 |

| Part Number | SR3WV | YE2314C4T4MFH |

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 wins all multi-core tests, but by less than 1.1%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 4893 versus the Intel Xeon E-2104G’s 4847, a -0.9% difference.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2104G has a 65 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 operates at just 15 W. This makes the AMD part significantly more power-efficient for embedded applications.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon E-2104G and AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 support ECC memory, and both use dual-channel DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

Q: What is the cache difference between the two?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2104G has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, plus 8 MB shared L3. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 has 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, but only 4 MB shared L3.

Q: Which processor has a higher clock speed?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2104G runs at a fixed 3.20 GHz with no boost. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 has a 2.10 GHz base clock but boosts to 3.50 GHz.

Q: Are these processors still in production?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2104G is end-of-life, having been released in July 2018. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 is active, with a release date of June 2022.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 wins in every benchmark category, but its real advantages lie outside raw performance. The 15 W TDP makes it ideal for passively cooled embedded systems, industrial controllers, or compact fanless PCs where thermal constraints are severe. Its active production status and newer 2022 release date ensure a longer supply chain lifespan, and the 12 nm process with 4,940 million transistors suggests headroom for sustained operation in demanding environments. The R2314’s per-core cache configuration (96 KB L1, 512 KB L2) may also benefit workloads with high data locality, even if its 4 MB L3 is half the Intel’s.

The Intel Xeon E-2104G wins in scenarios where its 8 MB L3 cache provides a tangible benefit, databases or virtualized workloads with large shared data sets could see an advantage despite the benchmark deltas showing otherwise. Its higher 3.20 GHz base clock, while lacking boost, offers predictable, consistent performance for time-sensitive tasks that cannot tolerate frequency variability. The Xeon’s Server/Workstation market segment and 65 W TDP suggest it was designed for always-on rack deployments where power is less critical than stability. For organizations with existing Intel Socket 1151 infrastructure, the E-2104G offers an upgrade path without board changes, though its end-of-life status limits future scalability. Ultimately, the data shows the AMD part dominates in efficiency and edges out in speed, while the Intel part offers cache capacity and clock stability, both valid but narrower use cases.