AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 vs Intel Core i5-4570S Comparison

The Intel Core i5-4570S and AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 are both 4-core, 4-thread processors that land at the same 37th percentile in the global CPU benchmark distribution, yet their performance profiles diverge sharply in the head-to-head data. The Ryzen Embedded R2314 wins all six benchmark comparisons, with deltas ranging from -12.8% to -13.2% in favor of the AMD part depending on the test. Despite this consistent deficit, the Intel chip’s average benchmark score of 1426 is actually higher than the AMD part’s 1415, a quirk explained by the fact that the Intel sample includes Geekbench results while the AMD sample does not. This makes the head-to-head Cinebench comparisons especially revealing, as they isolate raw compute performance across three generations of the test.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 scoring 493 against the Intel Core i5-4570S’s 428, a -13.2% delta that translates to a 15.2% raw performance advantage for the AMD part. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 69 versus 60, a -13% delta. Moving to Cinebench R20, the AMD chip scores 2055 multi-core and 289 single-core, while the Intel chip scores 1787 and 252 respectively—again a -13% delta in both cases. The most recent Cinebench R23 test shows the AMD part reaching 4893 multi-core and 690 single-core, against Intel’s 4256 and 600, with the delta holding steady at -13%.

The consistency of these deltas is remarkable. Across all six benchmarks, the AMD part’s advantage never strays outside the -12.8% to -13.2% band, indicating a stable architectural performance gap rather than a workload-specific quirk. The Intel i5-4570S does not win a single head-to-head comparison, recording 0 wins against the AMD part’s 6. However, the average benchmark scores tell a nuanced story: the Intel chip’s 1426 average, which includes Geekbench multi-core (2945) and single-core (1083) results, edges out the AMD part’s 1415 average that lacks Geekbench data. This suggests that in applications modeled by Geekbench, the Intel chip may be more competitive, though the official head-to-head dataset does not include those tests.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 wins all six official head-to-head benchmarks, making it the clear choice for Cinebench-style rendering workloads. Its multi-core scores—493 in R15, 2055 in R20, and 4893 in R23—represent a 13% advantage over the Intel part across every generation of the test. This consistent multi-core lead indicates that the AMD chip’s Zen+ architecture handles threaded rendering tasks more efficiently, despite both parts having identical core and thread counts. The single-core results (69 in R15, 289 in R20, 690 in R23) also favor AMD by the same margin, showing that the performance advantage is not dependent on thread scaling but reflects a higher instruction-per-clock capability.

The Intel Core i5-4570S does not win any benchmark in the official head-to-head set, but its average benchmark score of 1426 versus the AMD part’s 1415 suggests that outside the Cinebench suite, the Intel chip may hold its own. The Geekbench data—2945 multi-core and 1083 single-core—is only available for the Intel part, and when included in the average, it pushes the Intel chip slightly ahead. This implies that for general-purpose desktop tasks modeled by Geekbench, the Intel part could be competitive or even superior, though the absence of matching AMD Geekbench scores prevents a direct comparison. The Intel chip also offers a significantly higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.10 GHz, which could benefit lightly threaded workloads that rely on sustained frequency rather than boost behavior.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design eras and philosophies. The Intel Core i5-4570S uses the Haswell architecture, built on Intel’s 22 nm process with 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 uses the Zen+ architecture (codename Picasso), fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 12 nm process with 4,940 million transistors on a 210 mm² die. The transistor count difference is stark—the AMD part packs over 3.5 times as many transistors—reflecting the more complex Zen+ design with its larger caches and integrated memory controller.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Intel chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip offers 96 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, but only 4 MB of shared L3. This means the Intel part has 50% more L3 cache, while the AMD part has double the L1 and L2 per core. The AMD chip’s larger per-core caches likely contribute to its higher single-core performance, enabling better data locality for frequently accessed instructions. Memory support also diverges: the Intel chip uses dual-channel DDR3, while the AMD chip uses dual-channel DDR4 with a specified bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip does not, making it more suitable for embedded and reliability-focused applications.

Integrated graphics and platform features further differentiate the two. The Intel chip includes Intel HD 4600 graphics, while the AMD part features Radeon Vega 6. Both use PCIe Gen 3, but the AMD part specifies 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel chip does not provide a lane count in the data. The AMD chip’s TDP is 15 W versus the Intel chip’s 65 W, a 4.3x power efficiency advantage that is critical for embedded deployments. The Intel chip uses Socket 1150, while the AMD part uses Socket FP5, meaning they are not platform-compatible. The release dates also reflect their positioning: the Intel chip launched in June 2013, while the AMD part launched in June 2022—a nine-year gap that explains the architectural leap.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570S boosts to 3.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 boosts to 3.50 GHz. Despite the Intel chip’s 0.10 GHz higher boost clock, the AMD part still wins all Cinebench single-core tests by approximately 13%.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-4570S and AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 have 4 cores and 4 threads. This means the performance differences in multi-core benchmarks are attributable to architecture and clock behavior rather than core count.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-4570S does not, which limits its suitability for error-sensitive embedded workloads where data integrity is critical.

Q: How does the power consumption compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 has a TDP of 15 W, while the Intel Core i5-4570S has a TDP of 65 W. The AMD part uses significantly less power, which is a major advantage for passively cooled or thermally constrained embedded systems.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570S has 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 has 4 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 50% more L3, yet the AMD chip still achieves higher Cinebench scores, suggesting its per-core L1 and L2 caches (96 KB and 512 KB per core, respectively) compensate for the smaller L3.

Q: Which processor is newer?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 was released in June 2022, while the Intel Core i5-4570S was released in June 2013. The nine-year gap explains the AMD part’s use of 12 nm process technology and DDR4 memory support versus the Intel chip’s 22 nm process and DDR3 support.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 outperforms the Intel Core i5-4570S in every Cinebench test, with a consistent 13% advantage across multi-core and single-core workloads. For applications that rely on rendering, video encoding, or other threaded compute tasks, the AMD part is the clear winner. Its 15 W TDP versus 65 W, ECC memory support, and DDR4 bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s further cement its position for embedded and industrial use cases where reliability and power efficiency are paramount. The AMD part also benefits from a modern 12 nm Zen+ architecture, which explains its higher instructions-per-clock despite lower base and boost clocks.

The Intel Core i5-4570S, however, should not be dismissed. Its average benchmark score of 1426 is actually higher than the AMD part’s 1415, driven by Geekbench results that show strong multi-core (2945) and single-core (1083) performance. For desktop workloads that resemble Geekbench’s mix of integer, floating-point, and memory tests, the Intel chip may deliver comparable or better performance. Its larger 6 MB L3 cache and higher base clock of 2.90 GHz could benefit latency-sensitive applications that do not scale with thread count. The Intel chip is also the only option for users locked into the Socket 1150 platform, whereas the AMD part requires the Socket FP5 platform.

The choice ultimately depends on the workload and platform constraints. For embedded systems, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R2314 is the superior part on every metric that matters: performance, power, memory bandwidth, and ECC support. For a desktop user with existing DDR3 memory and a Haswell-era motherboard, the Intel Core i5-4570S remains a viable option, especially if Geekbench-style tasks dominate. The data shows that while the AMD part wins the head-to-head, the Intel chip’s overall benchmark average keeps it within striking distance—evidence of the Haswell architecture’s longevity, even against a processor released nine years later.