AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs Intel Core i7-2715QE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a consistent, if narrow, advantage for the Intel Core i7-2715QE across every Cinebench test in the comparison. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G does not secure a single win, with the Intel part taking all five head-to-head matchups. The margins are tight, ranging from 2.2% to 2.5%, which suggests the two processors are closely matched in raw rendering workloads despite their generational and architectural differences.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel Core i7-2715QE scores 275 against 269 for the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G, a delta of 2.2% in Intel's favor. The R20 multi-core test shows a similar pattern: Intel scores 1149, AMD scores 1121, a 2.4% gap. The single-core results echo this trend. In Cinebench R20 single-core, Intel leads 162 to 158, a 2.5% difference, while in R23 single-core, Intel scores 386 versus 377, a 2.3% edge. The R23 multi-core test rounds out the sweep with Intel at 2737 and AMD at 2670, again a 2.4% difference.

What stands out is the consistency of the gap. Across all five benchmarks, the Intel processor holds a lead that never drops below 2.2% and never exceeds 2.5%. This uniformity indicates that the performance difference is not workload-specific but rather a general characteristic of the two designs. The average benchmark score in the database reinforces this picture: the Intel Core i7-2715QE carries an average score of 942, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G sits at 919, a difference of roughly 2.5%. The Intel part also holds a slightly higher percentile ranking among all CPUs, at 25 compared to AMD's 24.

The nearest rivals listed in the database provide additional context. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G's closest competitor by average score is the AMD PRO A10-9700E, which matches it exactly at 919 with a 0% delta. The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U trails by 0.2% at 917, while the Intel Pentium Gold G6405T sits 0.5% behind at 915. The AMD FX-4320 is 0.2% ahead at 921. For the Intel Core i7-2715QE, the closest rival is the Intel Core i3-8145U at 941, just 0.1% behind, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K is 0.1% ahead at 943, the AMD A8-7670K is 0.3% ahead at 944, and the Intel Core i3-1110G4 leads by 0.3% at 945.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-2715QE wins every recorded test. There are no categories in which the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G takes a lead. However, the narrow margins mean that the AMD part is not decisively outclassed in any single metric. The largest gap is 2.5% in Cinebench R20 single-core, which is a small enough margin to be within run-to-run variance for many workloads. Still, from a purely score-based perspective, the Intel processor is the superior choice for Cinebench rendering tasks.

For users prioritizing multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i7-2715QE offers 4 cores and 8 threads compared to the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 2 cores and 4 threads. The raw thread count advantage is substantial, yet the actual multi-core score difference is modest. This suggests that the AMD's Zen architecture, despite fewer threads, delivers competitive throughput per thread. The R23 multi-core result of 2670 for AMD versus 2737 for Intel, a 2.4% gap, indicates that the AMD part's architectural efficiency partially compensates for its thread deficit.

In single-core performance, the story is similar. The Intel part leads by 2.3% to 2.5% depending on the test version. This is a narrow margin for two processors separated by roughly nine years of release dates. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G's Zen architecture, built on a 14 nm process, closes most of the single-thread gap against the older Sandy Bridge design. For use cases that depend on single-thread responsiveness, such as lightly threaded applications, the two processors should feel nearly identical in practice.

The use-case split, therefore, is not about one chip dominating a category but about the Intel part consistently edging ahead everywhere. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G's 10 W TDP compared to Intel's 45 W TDP suggests that thermally constrained or battery-powered systems might prefer the AMD part, but the benchmark data itself does not capture power efficiency. The recorded performance metrics show a clear, if narrow, sweep for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is part of the 1000 series, using the Zen architecture with the codename "Zen" and the generation label "Ryzen Embedded (Zen (Banded Kestrel))". It is built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 3,500 million transistors on a 148 mm² die. The Intel Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge architecture, built on a 32 nm process at Intel, with 1,160 million transistors on a 216 mm² die. The process node difference is significant: AMD's 14 nm node is considerably more advanced than Intel's 32 nm node, which helps explain how the AMD chip achieves comparable performance with far fewer physical resources.

Core and thread counts differ markedly. The AMD part has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel part has 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives Intel a 2x advantage in both cores and threads. The cache configurations also diverge. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G features 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-2715QE has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, while the Intel part has more total L3 cache.

Clock speeds tell a nuanced story. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The Intel Core i7-2715QE has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. Intel holds the advantage in both base and boost frequencies, which contributes to its slightly higher benchmark scores. However, the AMD part's higher per-core cache sizes and newer architecture help it stay within striking distance despite the clock deficit.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G supports DDR4 with a dual-channel memory bus and a peak memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-2715QE's memory support is not listed in the database, though it does use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part does not support ECC memory, and neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1023. The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part's PCIe configuration is not recorded.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G includes Radeon Vega 3 graphics, while the Intel Core i7-2715QE includes Intel HD 3000. The production statuses also contrast: the AMD part is listed as Active, while the Intel part is End-of-life. The release dates reflect this, with the Intel processor launching in January 2011 and the AMD processor launching in February 2020, roughly nine years apart.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-2715QE has an average benchmark score of 942, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has an average score of 919.

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core i7-2715QE in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i7-2715QE scores 2737 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G scores 2670, giving Intel a 2.4% lead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Intel Core i7-2715QE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is built on a 14 nm process, while the Intel Core i7-2715QE is built on a 32 nm process. The AMD part uses the smaller node.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has a TDP of 10 W, while the Intel Core i7-2715QE has a TDP of 45 W.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-2715QE has a boost clock of 3.00 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has a boost clock of 2.80 GHz.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core i7-2715QE is the faster processor in every benchmark recorded. It wins all five head-to-head Cinebench tests, holds a higher average benchmark score (942 versus 919), and ranks slightly higher in the overall CPU percentile (25 versus 24). The margins are consistent, all between 2.2% and 2.5%, which means the Intel part delivers a small but reliable performance advantage across both single-core and multi-core workloads.

That said, the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is not far behind. A 2.4% gap in R23 multi-core, despite the Intel part having twice as many cores and threads, speaks to the efficiency of the Zen architecture. The AMD chip also offers a dramatically lower TDP of 10 W versus 45 W, which the database shows but does not translate into a performance score. For systems where power draw and thermals are the primary constraints, the AMD part's profile is attractive, though the benchmark results alone cannot quantify that benefit.

For users who prioritize raw Cinebench performance, the Intel Core i7-2715QE is the clear pick from the recorded scores. It leads in every test, and its 4-core, 8-thread configuration provides headroom for multi-threaded tasks. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G, with its 2-core, 4-thread setup, is the choice for those who need competitive rendering performance in a much lower power envelope, as reflected in the TDP figures. The production status also matters: the AMD part is Active, while the Intel part is End-of-life, which could influence platform longevity decisions. The benchmark data, however, is unambiguous: Intel wins every recorded comparison, even if the victories are narrow.