AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G vs Intel Core i3-4350T Comparison

The Intel Core i3-4350T and the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G are both 2-core, 4-thread processors, but they target very different segments of the market. The Intel chip is a 35W desktop part from the Haswell era, while the AMD chip is a 10W mobile/embedded part based on the Zen architecture. Benchmark results show a remarkably tight contest, with the Intel Core i3-4350T taking a narrow win in every single Cinebench test, but the data also reveals distinct architectural philosophies that could sway a buyer in one direction or the other. This analysis breaks down where each processor wins based strictly on the provided benchmark and specification data.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a statistical tie, but the Intel Core i3-4350T holds a slight edge in every measured category. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, the Intel chip scores 271 against the AMD’s 269, a delta of 0.7%. The gap widens marginally in Cinebench R20 multicore, where Intel’s 1130 beats AMD’s 1121 by 0.8%. The single-core results follow the same pattern, with Intel leading 159 to 158 in Cinebench R20 single-core (0.6% delta) and 380 to 377 in Cinebench R23 single-core (0.8% delta). Across all five head-to-head benchmarks, the Intel Core i3-4350T wins all five, yet the largest margin is just 0.8%. This means that in raw compute performance, neither chip has a meaningful advantage; the Intel part is consistently ahead, but by a margin that would be imperceptible in real-world use.

The real differentiator lies in the power and platform specifications. The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G operates at a 10W TDP, which is less than a third of the Intel Core i3-4350T’s 35W TDP. This is a dramatic efficiency advantage. The AMD chip also supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus delivering 38.4 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the Intel chip’s DDR3 support with 25.6 GB/s. For embedded or mobile applications where thermal headroom and battery life are critical, the AMD part wins decisively on efficiency and modern memory support. The Intel chip, however, has a higher base clock of 3.10 GHz versus the AMD’s 1.50 GHz base clock, though the AMD part can boost up to 2.80 GHz. The Intel chip also offers more PCIe lanes (16 lanes Gen 3 versus 8 lanes Gen 3), which could be relevant for desktop expansion.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i3-4350T is the better choice for users who prioritize absolute peak performance in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, even if that advantage is marginal. Its 0.7-0.8% lead in Cinebench scores across the board makes it the winner in every benchmark comparison, and its higher base clock of 3.10 GHz suggests it can maintain consistent performance without relying on boost behavior. The Intel chip also has a larger average benchmark score of 926 versus the AMD’s 919, reinforcing its slight performance edge. For a desktop user with a Socket 1150 motherboard, the Intel Core i3-4350T is the straightforward pick.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G, on the other hand, is the clear winner for embedded or mobile applications where power consumption is paramount. Its 10W TDP is a fraction of the Intel’s 35W, and it still delivers nearly identical performance—within 0.8% in all tests. The AMD chip’s support for DDR4 memory (38.4 GB/s bandwidth) is a generational advantage over DDR3 (25.6 GB/s), offering better memory bandwidth per watt. Its 14nm process node with 3,500 million transistors in a 148 mm² die also indicates a more modern design compared to Intel’s 22nm node with 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. For system builders targeting low-power, always-on devices or compact embedded systems, the Ryzen Embedded R1305G is the superior choice, sacrificing a negligible amount of performance for massive efficiency gains.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most notable aspect of the head-to-head results is the consistency of the Intel Core i3-4350T’s victories. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel chip scores 271 versus the AMD’s 269, a 0.7% delta. This is mirrored in Cinebench R20 multicore, where Intel’s 1130 beats AMD’s 1121 by 0.8%. The single-core tests show the same story: Cinebench R20 single-core has Intel at 159 and AMD at 158 (0.6% delta), while Cinebench R23 single-core has Intel at 380 and AMD at 377 (0.8% delta). The Cinebench R23 multicore test also yields a 0.8% delta, with Intel at 2692 and AMD at 2670.

These deltas are so small that they fall within run-to-run variance for most benchmarking scenarios. However, the fact that Intel wins every single test suggests a slight architectural efficiency advantage in Cinebench’s rendering workload. The Intel chip’s 3.10 GHz base clock is significantly higher than the AMD’s 1.50 GHz base clock, and even though the AMD part can boost to 2.80 GHz, it appears that sustained multi-core loads don’t allow it to hold that boost as effectively as the Intel chip holds its fixed clock. The Intel chip’s average benchmark score of 926 versus the AMD’s 919 further cements this pattern, placing the Intel part in the 25th percentile of all CPUs versus the AMD’s 24th percentile.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i3-4350T has an average benchmark score of 926, compared to the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G’s 919, making the Intel chip the higher scorer by 7 points.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core i3-4350T has a TDP of 35W, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G has a TDP of 10W, meaning the AMD chip uses significantly less power.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus delivering 38.4 GB/s, while the Intel Core i3-4350T supports DDR3 with a dual-channel bus delivering 25.6 GB/s.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multicore performance?

A: The Intel Core i3-4350T scores 2692 in Cinebench R23 multicore, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G scores 2670, giving the Intel chip a 0.8% advantage.

Q: What are the production statuses of these processors?

A: The Intel Core i3-4350T is listed as "End-of-life," while the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is listed as "Active."

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i3-4350T has a base clock of 3.10 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G’s base clock of 1.50 GHz, though the AMD chip can boost to 2.80 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark, reflecting their different release eras and design goals. The Intel Core i3-4350T is built on Intel’s 22nm process node with 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die, using the Haswell architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads with a base clock of 3.10 GHz and no boost clock. Its cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The chip supports DDR3 memory on a dual-channel bus with 25.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Its integrated graphics are Intel HD 4600, and it uses the Intel Socket 1150. The chip was released on 2014-05-10 with a launch MSRP of $138.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1305G is built on GlobalFoundries’ 14nm process node with 3,500 million transistors on a 148 mm² die, using the Zen architecture. It also features 2 cores and 4 threads, but its base clock is just 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 2.80 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is larger per core, with 96 KB of L1 per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, though it shares the same 4 MB L3 cache as the Intel chip. The AMD part supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides 8 PCIe Gen 3 lanes. Its integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 3, and it uses the AMD Socket FP5. The chip was released on 2020-02-24 and is still in active production. The AMD chip’s transistor count is more than double the Intel’s, despite the smaller die size, which reflects the denser 14nm process. The Intel chip’s higher base clock is a direct result of its higher 35W TDP, while the AMD chip’s lower clock and boost behavior are tailored for its 10W power envelope. The memory support difference is also significant, with DDR4 offering higher bandwidth and better efficiency than DDR3.