AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a direct comparison between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, though the database currently contains no head-to-head benchmark scores for these two specific units. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235, however, has a comprehensive set of benchmark results, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X has no individual benchmark scores listed in its entry. This asymmetry makes a direct numerical comparison impossible at this time, but the available data for the Intel part provides a clear picture of its performance profile.

For the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, the Cinebench results indicate a multi-core score of 14,769 in Cinebench R23, with a single-core score of 2,085 in the same test. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 6,202 and single-core is 875. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1,488 multi-core and 210 single-core. These figures place the Intel chip at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 46,062. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with an average score of 46,030, a delta of just 0.1 percent, and the Intel Core i9-13900HX at 46,098, which is 0.1 percent faster. The AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303 trail by 0.2 percent each, with scores of 45,970 and 45,960 respectively.

The PassMark suite for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 shows strong results across various workloads. The multithread score is 37,816, while single-thread performance is 4,516. Floating point math scores 117,951, and integer math reaches 87,948. Data compression scores 390,711, while data encryption hits 29,293. Extended instructions score 32,752, and random string sorting reaches 48,980. Physics simulation scores 2,570, and prime number finding scores 371. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer and floating-point workloads with considerable efficiency.

Since the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X lacks benchmark entries, the data cannot confirm any wins for either processor in a head-to-head format. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, reflecting the absence of comparative test results. The database will require additional benchmark submissions to establish a direct performance comparison between these two desktop processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 5 235?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46,062, placing it at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is within 0.2 percent of its nearest rivals. It is 0.1 percent faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, 0.1 percent slower than the Intel Core i9-13900HX, and 0.2 percent faster than both the AMD EPYC 4364P and AMD EPYC 7303.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X currently has no benchmark scores listed. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 uses a 3 nm process, also from TSMC.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 does not support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X was released on 2025-10-06, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 was released on 2025-01-06.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their fundamental architecture. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X belongs to the 9000 series with the codename Granite Ridge, built on the Zen 5 architecture. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and contains 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². This dual-die design is a notable feature, as it separates the compute cores into two chiplets. The AMD part features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. Its thermal design power is 170 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 comes from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the codename Arrow Lake-S and the Arrow Lake architecture. It is built on a 3 nm process from TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a single 243 mm² die. The Intel chip has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its thermal design power is 65 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1851. The Intel part does not have an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part does.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the AMD side suggests an advantage in workloads that benefit from large shared data pools. The Intel side has a larger L2 cache per core, which could help with per-core data locality.

Memory support shows both processors use DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. However, the memory bandwidth differs: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X delivers 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 delivers 102.4 GB/s. The Intel part offers higher theoretical memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but absent on the Intel chip. PCIe lane counts also differ, with the AMD part providing Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU. The production status for both is active, and both target the desktop market segment.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 is a well-characterized processor with strong benchmark results across a wide range of tests. Its 89th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 46,062 demonstrate solid performance, especially in multi-threaded workloads where its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,769 stands out. The processor sits within 0.2 percent of its nearest rivals, showing that its performance is highly competitive within its segment. The 65-watt thermal design power is notably lower than the AMD part's 170 watts, which suggests greater efficiency per watt, though the database does not provide direct efficiency metrics.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X presents a different picture. With no benchmark results in the database, its performance cannot be quantified from the recorded data. However, its specifications suggest a high-core-count processor with 16 cores and 32 threads, a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The 170-watt thermal design power indicates a high-power design intended for demanding workloads. The 4 nm process and dual-die layout with 16,630 million transistors suggest a complex, high-end part.

For users choosing between these two, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 offers verified, measurable performance with a strong multi-threaded showing. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X offers a higher core count and thread count, plus ECC memory support, but without benchmark data, its real-world performance remains unconfirmed. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $257, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The data supports the Intel chip for those who require confirmed performance metrics, while the AMD chip appears positioned for workloads that benefit from more cores and threads, provided the higher power draw is acceptable.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X | Intel Core Ultra 5 235 |

|---------------|---------------------------|------------------------|

| Series | 9000 series | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 16 | 14 |

| Threads | 32 | 14 |

| Base Clock | 4.30 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.70 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 170 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Transistors | 16,630 million | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | True | False |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 28 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |

| Multiplier Unlocked | True | False |

| Release Date | 2025-10-06 | 2025-01-06 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $257 |

| Part Number | 100-000001277E | SRQAS |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 demonstrates clear strengths in the recorded benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,769 and single-core score of 2,085 indicate robust performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The PassMark floating point math score of 117,951 and integer math score of 87,948 show strong computational abilities. Data compression at 390,711 and random string sorting at 48,980 suggest efficiency in data manipulation workloads. The physics score of 2,570 and extended instructions score of 32,752 round out a comprehensive performance profile. The lower 65-watt thermal design power also makes this chip suitable for systems with tighter power budgets. The 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth provides an edge in memory-intensive operations.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X wins on specification-based advantages. Its 16 cores and 32 threads double the thread count of the Intel part, which typically benefits heavily threaded workloads such as rendering, scientific computing, and virtualization. The 64 MB L3 cache is more than double the Intel chip's 24 MB, which can improve performance in workloads with large working sets. The 5.70 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel part's 5.00 GHz, and the 170-watt TDP enables sustained operation at higher power levels. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, which is critical for data integrity in server and workstation environments. Its 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer more expansion capability than the Intel part's 20 lanes. The AMD chip also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing manual overclocking, whereas the Intel part is locked.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 wins on verified performance, efficiency, and a lower launch MSRP of $257. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9950X wins on raw specifications, ECC support, and expansion capabilities. Without benchmark data for the AMD part, the database cannot confirm which processor is faster in real-world tests. The data supports the Intel chip for users who prioritize measured performance and lower power consumption. The AMD chip appears positioned for users who need maximum core counts, ECC memory, and extensive PCIe connectivity.