AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245T Comparison

The recorded comparison for this pairing is one-sided. The database lists a set of benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, including Cinebench R15, R20, R23 and PassMark scores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has no benchmark scores and no rival comparison data. Direct head-to-head percentages cannot be formed from the available entries, so the Intel part's measured scores and the two processors' listed specifications carry the analysis.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No direct head-to-head entries are recorded for this pair, and neither processor is assigned a direct win. The only recorded benchmark scores belong to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T. In Cinebench R15, it records 2641 in multi-core and 372 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it records 11007 in multi-core and 1553 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it records 26208 in multi-core and 3699 in single-core. PassMark results include data compression at 283812, data encryption at 23656, extended instructions at 22071, find prime numbers at 324, floating point math at 108499, integer math at 88676, multithread at 30833, physics at 2278, random string sorting at 34931, and single thread at 4367.

The Intel part's average benchmark score is 38194, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its closest recorded rivals form a tight cluster. The Intel part's average score of 38194 is 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen 7 250, 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14490F, 0.2% below the Intel Core i5-13600HX, and 0.2% above the Intel Core i5-13600KF. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, with no individual workload scores recorded. There are no AMD wins to walk through in this section; the only measurable scores in the pairing are Intel's.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D?

A: None. The AMD part has no individual benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of 0, and no rival comparison data. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T has recorded scores in Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: What are the Intel part's Cinebench R23 results?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 26208 in multi-core and 3699 in single-core.

Q: How does the Intel part's average score compare with its closest rivals?

A: Its average score of 38194 is 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen 7 250, 0.1% above the Intel Core i5-14490F, 0.2% below the Intel Core i5-13600HX, and 0.2% above the Intel Core i5-13600KF.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: Which part has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD part has 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The AMD part uses a 4 nm process. The Intel part uses a 3 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Architecture Differences

Both processors carry the desktop market segment, active production status, DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory buses, and ECC support. The differences appear in the listed architecture fields. AMD uses the Granite Ridge design, listed under the Ryzen Embedded generation with Zen 5 (Granite Ridge). Intel uses the Arrow Lake design, listed as Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) with the codename Arrow Lake-S.

The manufacturing details differ. AMD is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC and reports 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies. Intel is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC and reports 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. AMD provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while Intel provides 14 cores and 14 threads. The cache hierarchy is different: AMD lists 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB L3; Intel lists 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Memory bandwidth is another difference: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s and Intel lists 102.4 GB/s. Both support PCIe Gen 5, but AMD exposes 24 CPU lanes and Intel exposes 20 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics solutions differ: AMD lists Radeon Graphics, while Intel lists Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5; the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1851. The AMD multiplier is unlocked, while the Intel multiplier is not unlocked.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D | Intel Core Ultra 5 245T |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | not recorded | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Arrow Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)) | Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) |

| Cores | 12 | 14 |

| Threads | 24 | 14 |

| Base clock | 4.40 | 2.20 |

| Boost clock | 5.50 | 5.10 |

| TDP | 120 | 65 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Transistors | 16,630 million | 17,800 million |

| Die size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 128 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Release date | 2025-10-06 | 2025-01-06 |

| Multiplier unlocked | true | false |

| Part number | 100-000001368E | SRVFF |

| Launch MSRP | none recorded | $270 |

Where Each One Wins

Based on benchmark wins, the Intel part accounts for all measured wins. The database assigns no direct wins to either part, but the Intel part is the only one with scores. Its PassMark data compression score of 283812 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26208 are the highest recorded numbers in its set. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4367 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3699 represent the single-threaded workloads. The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores, so no workload can be assigned to it. The AMD part's listed specifications, including 12 cores, 24 threads, 128 MB L3 cache, and a 5.50 boost clock, do not create any recorded wins in this comparison.

The Verdict

Strictly from the recorded data, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T is the only part with a measurable performance profile. It has an average benchmark score of 38194, an 86th percentile ranking, and a set of Cinebench and PassMark results. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D is listed at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 and no individual benchmark entries. The database therefore supports the Intel part when measured performance is the selection criterion. The AMD part's specifications are recorded, but no performance evidence places it ahead in any workload.