AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D, so its performance profile is derived entirely from its specifications. The Intel part delivers a multi-thread score of 38,706 in PassMark, a single-thread score of 4,394, and a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 32,924. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score stands at 4,648. In the PassMark suite, the Core Ultra 5 245 posts 120,548 in floating point math, 91,187 in integer math, and 400,942 in data compression. These figures place the chip at the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 48,995.

The nearest rivals in the database for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 are closely grouped. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G averages 49,196, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 averages 49,228, or 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H averages 48,698, which is 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i5-14600K averages 48,618, or 0.8% lower. The data shows the Core Ultra 5 245 sits in a tight performance band where the difference between the closest rival above and closest rival below is roughly one percent. This suggests the chip trades places with these competitors depending on the workload, rather than dominating or being dominated.

For the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D, the absence of benchmark entries means no head-to-head wins can be attributed to it from measured results. The processor does carry specifications that suggest competitive positioning, including 12 cores, 24 threads, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 14 cores with 14 threads, meaning no hyper-threading, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 4.40 GHz versus 3.50 GHz for Intel. These clock and core differences would influence workloads differently, but without measured scores for the AMD part, the database cannot produce a direct numeric comparison.

The Verdict

The data supports the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 as the documented performer in this pairing. Its recorded average benchmark score of 48,995 places it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within one percent, indicating a stable, well-measured position. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has no benchmark results in the database, so any claim about its real-world speed cannot be verified from recorded measurements.

Buyers who require verified performance data should select the Intel Core Ultra 5 245. The chip demonstrates strong multi-thread output with a PassMark score of 38,706 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 32,924. Its single-thread performance is also solid, with 4,394 in PassMark and 4,648 in Cinebench R23. The processor uses 14 threads across 14 cores, which is unusual for a modern desktop part, but the measured scores confirm it competes effectively with chips like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and Intel Core i5-14600K.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D should be considered only when its specific feature set matters more than measured benchmarks. It offers 24 threads, a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and 128 MB of L3 cache, all of which point to strong multi-threaded and cache-sensitive performance. However, the database records no scores for it, so there is no evidence of how those specifications translate into actual results. The Intel chip is the only one with a demonstrated track record in the database, and it is the safer pick based on available data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 support multi-threading?

A: No. The Intel chip has 14 cores and 14 threads, so each core handles one thread. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has 128 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has an average benchmark score of 48,995. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 uses a 3 nm process, also from TSMC.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. Each uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD part runs a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel part runs a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD chip is rated at 120 watts, the Intel chip at 65 watts.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1851. The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process, the Intel chip on a 3 nm process. Transistor counts are close: the AMD part has 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die, while the Intel part has 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The AMD chip has its multiplier unlocked; the Intel chip does not.

Cache hierarchies are very different. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Memory bandwidth favors the Intel part at 102.4 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s for AMD. PCIe lane counts also differ: AMD provides 24 lanes of Gen 5, Intel provides 20 lanes of Gen 5. The integrated graphics differ, with AMD offering Radeon Graphics and Intel offering Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $270.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D belongs to the 9000 series, uses the Granite Ridge codename, and is built on the Zen 5 architecture. It is listed as a Ryzen Embedded part with a generation label of "Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))". The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2, uses the Arrow Lake-S codename, and is built on the Arrow Lake architecture. Its generation label is "Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)".

Both chips are manufactured by TSMC, but on different nodes. AMD uses a 4 nm process, Intel uses a 3 nm process. The Intel chip has a higher transistor count at 17,800 million, though it uses a much larger die at 243 mm². The AMD chip uses a dual-die design with two 70.6 mm² dies, totaling roughly 141.2 mm². The Intel chip is a monolithic 243 mm² die. The AMD part has a larger L3 cache at 128 MB, which is a defining architectural feature for the 3D V-Cache family, even though the pack does not list a separate vCache3d value. The Intel part has a smaller 24 MB shared L3 but larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations.

Both processors support DDR5 memory and ECC, and both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part is unlocked for overclocking, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD chip has a release date of October 2025, while the Intel chip has a release date of January 2025. The Intel chip is already shipping with an active production status and a launch MSRP of $270. The AMD chip is also listed as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 38,706 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,924 show strong throughput for heavily threaded workloads. Its single-thread scores of 4,394 in PassMark and 4,648 in Cinebench R23 demonstrate equally capable per-core performance. The chip also delivers strong results in specialized tasks, including 400,942 in data compression, 302,36 in data encryption, and 33,304 in extended instructions. It sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within one percent, which indicates consistent performance across a range of applications.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D has no recorded wins because the database contains no benchmark results for it. Based on specifications alone, it would be expected to lead in cache-heavy workloads due to its 128 MB of L3 cache, and in multi-threaded productivity due to its 24 threads. Its 5.50 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel chip's 5.10 GHz, which could favor lightly threaded tasks. However, these are inferences from specifications, not measured outcomes. The database cannot confirm a single win for the AMD part.

For use-case planning, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is the documented choice for anyone who needs verified performance across both single-threaded and multi-threaded applications. Its power draw of 65 watts also makes it suitable for systems where thermal output is a concern. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X3D, with a 120 watt TDP, 128 MB of L3, and 24 threads, targets applications that benefit from large caches and high thread counts, such as embedded workloads or cache-sensitive server tasks, but its actual performance remains unmeasured in the database.