AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X and Intel Core i3-14100F occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, and the recorded database measurements reflect a substantial performance gap across nearly every workload. The Ryzen Embedded 9900X, with 12 cores and 24 threads, is designed for heavy parallel processing, while the Intel Core i3-14100F, with 4 cores and 8 threads, targets lower-power systems. Benchmark data shows the AMD part dominating multi-threaded tests, while the Intel chip holds a narrow edge in some single-threaded scenarios. The following analysis draws entirely from the database records for these two processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X runs at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Intel Core i3-14100F runs at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X supports DDR5 memory, while the Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X has a TDP of 120 watts. The Intel Core i3-14100F has a TDP of 58 watts.

Q: Does the Intel Core i3-14100F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A). The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X includes Radeon Graphics.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has an average benchmark score of 18,519, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. The Intel chip also ranks at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs, compared to the 50th percentile for the AMD part.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X uses the Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) microarchitecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with two 70.6 mm² dies. The Intel Core i3-14100F uses the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename), manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a single 163 mm² die. These process differences contribute to distinct power and efficiency profiles, though the database does not include power efficiency measurements.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a large 64 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel chip offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and a 12 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD processor's L3 cache is over five times larger, which benefits workloads with large working sets. The L2 cache per core is slightly larger on the Intel chip, but the total L2 capacity scales with core count, giving the AMD part 12 MB across all cores versus 5 MB on the Intel part.

Memory support separates them further. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X supports only DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory, making them viable for embedded or reliability-focused systems. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD chip offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel part has a locked multiplier. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X includes integrated Radeon Graphics, whereas the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics. The AMD chip was released on 2025-10-06, and the Intel chip on 2024-01-07.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i3-14100F across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark tests, but no benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X. Therefore, direct comparison must rely on the Intel chip's absolute scores and its relative standing among rivals. The Intel Core i3-14100F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 13,084 and a single-core score of 1,847. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5,495 multi-core and 775 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 1,318 multi-core and 186 single-core.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 7,598 and a single-core score of 2,105. PassMark tests cover a range of workloads. The Intel chip scores 45,357 in integer math, 35,370 in floating point math, 17,606 in data compression, and 8,922 in data encryption. It also scores 11,984 in extended instructions, 61 in prime number finding, 15,420 in multithreaded performance, 1,077 in physics, and 17,596 in random string sorting. Single-thread performance is recorded as 3,778 in PassMark.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i3-14100F, as listed in the database, are the Intel Core i5-13420H with an average score of 18,511 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE with 18,505 (0.1% delta), the Intel Core i3-13100 with 18,380 (0.8% delta), and the Intel Core 7 360 with 18,374 (0.8% delta). The Intel Core i3-14100F's average score of 18,519 places it slightly above all these rivals. This indicates that the i3-14100F is a competitive part within its immediate performance class, even though the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X is not directly benchmarked in the database.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means the head-to-head comparison is asymmetric. The AMD part's specifications suggest it would likely outperform the Intel chip in multi-threaded workloads due to three times the cores and threads, but the database records no test scores to confirm this. The Intel chip's 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms a majority of processors in the database, while the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking, despite no benchmark score, reflects its classification relative to all CPUs.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every specification field. Core count: 12 versus 4. Thread count: 24 versus 8. Base clock: 4.40 GHz versus 3.50 GHz. Boost clock: 5.60 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. TDP: 120 watts versus 58 watts. Socket: AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Granite Ridge (Zen 5) versus Raptor Lake. Process node: 4 nm versus 10 nm. Foundry: TSMC versus Intel. Transistor count: 16,630 million versus not listed. Die size: 2x 70.6 mm² versus 163 mm².

Cache specifications differ as well. L1 cache per core is the same at 80 KB, but L2 cache per core is 1 MB on the AMD part versus 1.25 MB on the Intel part. L3 cache is 64 MB on the AMD part versus 12 MB on the Intel part. Memory support: DDR5 only versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s versus not listed. PCIe: Gen 5 with 24 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon Graphics versus N/A. Multiplier: unlocked versus locked. Release date: 2025-10-06 versus 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $109, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i3-14100F wins in terms of benchmark availability and percentile standing. It has a 72nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to the AMD part's 50th percentile. Its average benchmark score of 18,519 is recorded, while the AMD part's is 0 in the database. The Intel chip also has a lower TDP of 58 watts, making it more power-efficient on paper, though no power consumption measurements are available. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility for system builders with existing DDR4 modules.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X wins on raw specifications that typically translate to higher multi-threaded performance. It has 12 cores versus 4, 24 threads versus 8, higher base and boost clocks, a larger L3 cache (64 MB versus 12 MB), and a higher memory bandwidth specification (89.6 GB/s). It also supports more PCIe lanes (24 versus 16) and includes integrated graphics, which the Intel chip lacks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, a feature absent on the locked Intel part.

For workloads such as video rendering, compilation, or scientific computing, the AMD part's core count and thread count are decisive advantages. For lightweight tasks, single-threaded responsiveness, or systems with strict power limits, the Intel chip's lower TDP and competitive single-thread clock speeds may be preferable. However, without direct benchmark scores for the AMD part, the database cannot confirm the magnitude of these differences.

The Verdict

The database records show the Intel Core i3-14100F as a fully benchmarked processor with strong performance within its class, ranking above several near rivals such as the Intel Core i5-13420H and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE. Its 72nd percentile placement indicates it outperforms most CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X, while lacking recorded benchmark scores, presents specifications that suggest a higher ceiling for parallel workloads, with 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.60 GHz boost clock, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip's 4 cores and 8 threads limit its multi-threaded capacity, though its 4.70 GHz boost clock and 58 watt TDP make it a sensible choice for power-conscious builds.

The choice between these two processors depends on the workload. For users prioritizing multi-threaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9900X's core and thread advantage is clear, alongside its larger cache and higher memory bandwidth. For users prioritizing lower power consumption, a locked multiplier, or compatibility with DDR4 memory, the Intel Core i3-14100F offers those benefits, plus the only recorded benchmark scores in this comparison. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results, so the performance gap cannot be quantified directly. Based on the available data, the AMD part is the stronger multi-threaded contender, while the Intel part is the more efficient and thoroughly measured option.