AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores, but the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X supports 16 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V supports 8 threads. This gives the AMD part a 2:1 thread advantage, which directly impacts multithreaded workload performance.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X boosts to 5.50 GHz, compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V's 5.00 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.80 GHz versus 2.20 GHz for the Intel chip.

Q: What are the TDP differences?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has a significantly lower TDP of 17 watts, whereas the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has a TDP of 65 watts. This makes the Intel processor substantially more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ranks in the 74th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X sits in the 50th percentile. The Intel part also has an average benchmark score of 20897, whereas the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V does not. This makes the AMD processor more suitable for workstation or server-class reliability requirements.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X includes Radeon Graphics, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V includes Arc 140V graphics. Both provide integrated display output capabilities, though the database does not record comparative graphics performance.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X belongs to the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, integrating 8,315 million transistors on a 70.6 mm² die. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V comes from the Core Ultra Series 2, using the Lunar Lake architecture on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. The process node difference gives Intel a slight manufacturing advantage in density and potential power efficiency.

Cache hierarchies diverge significantly. The AMD part allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part provides 192 KB of L1 per core and 2.5 MB of L2 per core, but only 12 MB of shared L3. The AMD processor offers substantially more aggregate L3, which benefits data-heavy workloads that rely on large working sets. The Intel processor's larger per-core L1 and L2 caches can reduce latency for single-threaded access patterns.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor uses DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor also uses dual-channel memory, but its memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD part supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe lane counts differ dramatically: the AMD processor provides 24 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides only 4 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). This makes the AMD part far more suitable for expansion-heavy systems.

The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, enabling overclocking, whereas the Intel processor's multiplier is locked. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2833, indicating a soldered mobile form factor. The AMD processor's production status is Active, with a release date of October 6, 2025. The Intel processor is also Active, released on September 23, 2024. The AMD part's market segment is Desktop, while the Intel part targets Mobile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V wins decisively in single-threaded and light-threaded workloads based on its recorded benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 1921, and in Cinebench R20 single-core, it scores 972. In Geekbench single-core, it reaches 2270. These results indicate strong per-clock performance from the Lunar Lake architecture, likely benefiting from its larger L1 and L2 caches and efficient 3 nm process. The Intel part also leads in PassMark single-thread performance with a score of 4051.

The Intel processor also demonstrates strengths in specific math and encryption workloads. Its PassMark floating-point math score of 57628 and integer math score of 42669 show robust arithmetic throughput. The data encryption score of 13779 and extended instructions score of 15323 confirm that the Intel part handles cryptographic and SIMD-heavy tasks effectively. Its PassMark data compression score of 181443 is particularly strong.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X's advantage lies in its thread count and cache capacity, though the database contains no recorded benchmarks for it. With 16 threads versus 8, the AMD part should theoretically dominate heavily parallel workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. Its 32 MB of L3 cache versus 12 MB on the Intel part further supports workloads with large datasets. The AMD part also offers 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it the clear choice for systems requiring multiple GPUs, NVMe drives, or other high-bandwidth peripherals. Its ECC memory support gives it an edge in reliability-critical environments.

The Intel part's 17 W TDP versus 65 W on the AMD part makes it the winner for power-constrained mobile or embedded applications where thermal headroom is limited.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 8 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.80 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.50 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 17 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB shared | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | Gen 5, 24 Lanes | Gen 5, 4 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics | Arc 140V |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | October 6, 2025 | September 23, 2024 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X and the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V. The AMD part has zero recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel part has an extensive set of results. The wins are therefore entirely one-sided in the recorded data.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V's strongest recorded results come from Cinebench. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 10653, and in Cinebench R20 multicore, it scores 6887. Its Cinebench R15 multicore score is 1616. In single-core runs, it records Cinebench R23 at 1921, Cinebench R20 at 972, and Cinebench R15 at 293. These numbers place the Intel part in the 74th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 20897.

Geekbench results for the Intel part show a multicore score of 9963 and a single-core score of 2270. PassMark results are extensive: multithread score of 19297, single-thread score of 4051, physics score of 1617, and random string sorting score of 22416. The data compression score of 181443 and data encryption score of 13779 indicate strong memory and cryptographic throughput. The extended instructions score of 15323, floating-point math score of 57628, and integer math score of 42669 round out the arithmetic profile. The find prime numbers score of 192 is comparatively low, suggesting weaker performance in that specific workload.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V provide context. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE has an average score of 20900, which is 0% different from the Intel part. The Intel Core i5-12600T scores 20917, a -0.1% difference. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 5 125U scores 20826, a 0.3% difference. These near-identical scores indicate that the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V sits in a tight performance cluster, with all four rivals within a 0.5% margin.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has no recorded benchmarks, no average score, and a 50th percentile ranking. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible from the database. The specification sheet suggests the AMD part should excel in multithreaded scenarios due to its 16 threads and larger L3 cache, but the recorded data cannot confirm this. The Intel part's 74th percentile ranking and 20897 average score demonstrate that it performs competitively against established desktop and mobile processors, despite its mobile-oriented design and lower TDP.