AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains a full benchmark profile for the Intel Core i5-14600T, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has no benchmark entries in the database. This asymmetry defines the comparison: the Intel part is measured across 19 individual workload tests, and the AMD part is evaluated on its architectural specifications alone. The Intel Core i5-14600T achieves an average benchmark score of 32707, which places it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, reflecting the absence of measured results rather than actual performance.

The Intel Core i5-14600T delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 and a single-core score of 3169. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 9427 and the single-core result is 1330. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 2262 and a single-core score of 319. Geekbench results for the Intel part are 12840 in multi-core and 2559 in single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 26409, a single-thread score of 3744, integer math at 95112, floating point math at 64726, extended instructions at 16985, data encryption at 18226, data compression at 301827, physics at 1873, random string sorting at 34310, and prime number finding at 121.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14600T provide context for these numbers. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, which is a 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750, a negative 0.1 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a positive 0.1 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, a negative 0.3 percent delta. These four rivals all sit within a narrow 150-point window around the 32707 average of the Intel Core i5-14600T, which indicates the measured performance of this chip is tightly clustered with contemporary mobile and desktop parts in the database.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has no head-to-head benchmark rows and no wins recorded in either direction. The database records winsA as 0 and winsB as 0, which means there are no directly paired test results comparing the two processors. The Intel Core i5-14600T therefore stands as the only fully measured processor in this comparison, with the AMD part remaining a specification-only entry.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T wins every measured workload category by default because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has no benchmark scores. The Intel part shows particular strength in PassMark data compression with a score of 301827, which is the highest single workload result in its profile. Integer math at 95112 and floating point math at 64726 both indicate solid compute throughput for general-purpose processing. Multi-threaded Cinebench R23 at 22447 confirms strong sustained all-core performance for rendering workloads.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X wins on specifications that are not workload-tested. It uses 8 cores and 16 threads versus the 14 cores and 20 threads of the Intel part, meaning the Intel chip has more parallel execution resources on paper. The AMD chip has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz compared to 5.10 GHz for the Intel chip, which suggests potential single-thread speed advantages that are not quantified by any recorded benchmark. The base clock difference is substantial: 3.80 GHz for AMD versus 1.80 GHz for Intel, though the Intel part carries a much lower TDP of 35 watts compared to 65 watts for AMD.

The use-case split follows the measured data. The Intel Core i5-14600T is the only part with demonstrated performance across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark suites, so any workload that relies on those tests is covered exclusively by the Intel entry. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has architectural claims such as a 4 nm process node and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, but no recorded result confirms how those translate into application performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32707 and sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has zero benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 with a 0 percent delta, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 with a negative 0.1 percent delta, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 with a positive 0.1 percent delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 with a negative 0.3 percent delta.

Q: What is the highest single benchmark score recorded for the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The highest result is PassMark data compression at 301827, followed by integer math at 95112 and floating point math at 64726.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14600T?

A: The launch MSRP is $255. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600T uses 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are 3.80 GHz for AMD and 1.80 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.50 GHz for AMD and 5.10 GHz for Intel. TDP is 65 watts for AMD and 35 watts for Intel. The AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core i5-14600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory. PCIe lanes differ: the AMD part offers Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses Radeon Graphics, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has a locked multiplier. Release dates are 2025-10-06 for AMD and 2024-01-07 for Intel. The AMD part number is 100-000001404E, and the Intel part number is SRN46. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X belongs to the 9000 series and is built on Granite Ridge with Zen 5 architecture. It uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, contains 8,315 million transistors, and has a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i5-14600T belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and is built on Raptor Lake-R with Raptor Lake architecture. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and has a die size of 257 mm². The Intel part has no transistor count recorded in the database.

Cache configurations differ. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9700X has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part offers a larger L3 pool but smaller per-core L2, while the Intel part doubles the per-core L2 allocation.

The AMD part is listed as Ryzen Embedded with the generation label "Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge))". The Intel part is listed as Core i5 with the generation label "Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)". Both use dual-channel memory buses and both support ECC memory. The AMD part has a smaller die at 70.6 mm² despite using a more advanced 4 nm node, which reflects the lower core count and different design philosophy. The Intel part uses a larger 257 mm² die on a 10 nm node, which accommodates its 14 cores and 20 threads.

The production status for both processors is listed as Active. The market segment for both is Desktop. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel, though the Intel part compensates with a larger core count and a lower 35-watt TDP. The AMD part has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz, which may provide an advantage in lightly threaded workloads, but no benchmark data confirms this. The Intel part has recorded performance across the full benchmark suite, while the AMD part remains unmeasured.