AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 150U, while no benchmark scores are listed for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X in this database entry. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible based on measured performance figures. The Intel part shows a substantial body of test results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark suites, but the AMD processor has zero recorded scores. Consequently, the database logs zero wins for each side in the head-to-head category. The Intel Core 7 150U posts an average benchmark score of 17,395 and sits at the 71st percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Ryzen Embedded 9600X shows an average score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking, though that figure reflects the absence of data rather than actual performance. Without comparable measurements, the benchmark section must be interpreted with caution. The Intel processor's multi-core results include a Cinebench R23 score of 8,883, a Cinebench R20 score of 5,248, and a Cinebench R15 score of 1,505.5. Its single-core results reach 1,875.5 in Cinebench R23, 740 in Cinebench R20, and 254 in Cinebench R15. Geekbench measurements show 6,234 for multi-core and 1,857 for single-core. Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 51,057, floating point math scores 34,405, extended instructions score 8,748, and data compression scores 158,622. The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 7 150U include the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 with an average score of 17,333 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 210 at 17,321 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE at 17,482 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G at 17,507 (0.6% higher). These deltas are narrow, indicating the Intel processor performs within a tight band around comparable desktop and embedded chips. The lack of any AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X benchmarks means no percentages or score differences can be cited between the two featured processors.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for this processor, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50. The Intel Core 7 150U, by contrast, has 19 recorded benchmark scores.

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 150U's best single-core result?

A: The highest single-core score in the database is 1,875.5 from Cinebench R23, followed by 740 in Cinebench R20 and 254 in Cinebench R15. Geekbench single-core reaches 1,857, and Passmark single-thread scores 3,508.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 150U compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The recorded data shows the Intel part at 17,395 average score, which is 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 5 4500 and AMD Ryzen 3 210, 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, and 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has 6 cores. Both processors present 12 threads in the database.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 150U does not.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: Both processors list a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 3.90 GHz and the Intel part at 1.80 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X belongs to the 9000 series and uses the Granite Ridge codename, with its generation labeled as Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5, Granite Ridge). It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a transistor count of 8,315 million and a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 150U uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename, designated as Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U). Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process, and the database records no transistor count or die size for it. The cache configurations differ markedly. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor also provides 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 cache is larger per core at 1.25 MB, while its shared L3 cache is smaller at 12 MB. The AMD design uses a monolithic die with a compact 70.6 mm² area, reflecting the denser 4 nm process. The Intel chip uses a larger process node and offers no die size data, but its hybrid core arrangement (implied by the 10-core, 12-thread configuration) relies on a mix of performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake-U. Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but absent on the Intel chip. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD part provides Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD chip using Radeon Graphics and the Intel chip using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel processor is locked. The market segments reflect their intended uses: the AMD chip is a desktop part, and the Intel chip is a mobile part. Production status for both is listed as Active.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights the fields where the two processors differ in the database:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X | Intel Core 7 150U |

|---------------|---------------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Base clock | 3.90 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 lanes | Gen 4, 8 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2025-10-06 | 2024-01-07 |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Part number | 100-000001405E | SRMYP |

Both processors share the same thread count (12), boost clock (5.40 GHz), L1 cache per core (80 KB), and dual-channel memory bus. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing information appears in this analysis.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the available data, the Intel Core 7 150U holds the clear advantage in measured performance. Its benchmark scores span multiple suites, and its 71st percentile ranking places it above the median. The nearest rivals, all AMD chips, sit within 0.6% of its average score, indicating competitive parity. The Intel processor wins in core count (10 versus 6) and offers higher L2 cache per core, which can benefit workloads that rely on per-core cache locality. Its lower TDP of 15 W versus 65 W makes it suitable for thermally constrained environments, such as thin mobile devices. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X wins in several architectural features despite lacking benchmark data. It supports newer PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which provides substantially more I/O bandwidth for expansion cards, NVMe storage, or accelerators. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache doubles the Intel chip's 12 MB, potentially improving performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for reliability-focused embedded or server applications. Its higher base clock of 3.90 GHz versus 1.80 GHz suggests stronger sustained performance at lower loads, though the Intel chip's boost clock matches at 5.40 GHz. The AMD processor uses a smaller 4 nm process, which typically offers better power efficiency per transistor, though the Intel chip's lower TDP indicates a different design target. The AMD processor's desktop market segment and unlocked multiplier appeal to users seeking overclocking or fixed installation in embedded chassis, while the Intel chip's mobile segment fits laptop or compact system designs.

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric picture. The Intel Core 7 150U has a complete set of benchmark results showing competitive performance around the 17,395 average score, with a 71st percentile placement. Its nearest rivals trail or lead by less than 1%, confirming it operates in a well-established performance tier. For any use case that requires verified throughput numbers, the Intel chip is the only one with recorded evidence. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has no benchmark scores, so any performance claim for it rests on architectural specifications alone. Its strengths are qualitative: ECC memory, PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, larger L3 cache, and a smaller process node. These features point toward embedded systems where data integrity, I/O expansion, and power efficiency matter more than raw benchmark scores. The Intel chip's 10 cores and higher L2 cache per core may offer better multi-threaded performance in the absence of direct comparisons, but the lack of AMD scores prevents confirmation. The database shows zero wins for either side in head-to-head tests, which is a direct consequence of the missing AMD dataset. Buyers selecting between these two parts should weigh the Intel processor's proven benchmark record and lower 15 W TDP against the AMD processor's superior I/O capabilities, ECC support, and newer process technology. For mobile or low-power systems where benchmark confidence is essential, the Intel Core 7 150U is the data-backed choice. For embedded deployments requiring PCIe Gen 5, ECC memory, and a desktop socket with an unlocked multiplier, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X offers the relevant specifications, though its performance remains unmeasured in this database.