AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X vs Intel Core 5 220H Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X and the Intel Core 5 220H?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X reaches a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 220H boosts up to 4.90 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 220H does not.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 220H uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 220H?

A: The launch MSRP is $342.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H has an average benchmark score of 28574 and sits at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has no recorded benchmark scores and holds the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X belongs to the Ryzen Embedded Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) generation. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 8,315 million transistors and a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 5 220H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process.

Cache layouts differ. The AMD chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and has 18 MB of shared L3. The larger shared L3 on the AMD side supports its 6-core setup, while Intel's bigger per-core L2 suits its 12-core hybrid design.

Memory support diverges. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 220H supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded and ECC is not supported. The AMD part also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, whereas the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket AM5, has an unlocked multiplier, and includes Radeon Graphics. The Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1744, has a locked multiplier, and integrates Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. The Intel chip is classified as mobile, while the AMD chip is desktop. The AMD release date is October 6, 2025, and the Intel release date is December 17, 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors. However, the Intel Core 5 220H has a full recorded benchmark suite. Its average benchmark score is 28574, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has no benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile gap indicates the Intel part is positioned well above the AMD part in the recorded performance distribution.

The Intel Core 5 220H delivers multicore results that reflect its 12 cores and 16 threads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 11198 multicore and 1853 singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7812 multicore and 1102 singlecore. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1835 multicore and 262 singlecore. PassMark results show 21884 in multithread and 3405 in single-thread tests. Integer math scores 73555, floating point math scores 51671, and extended instructions score 14642. Data compression reaches 247921, data encryption reaches 15216, and random string sorting reaches 28438. Prime number finding scores 82, and physics scores 1478.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 5 220H show how tightly grouped its performance is. The AMD EPYC 7203P has an average score of 28583, a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS scores 28549, a 0.1% delta. The Intel Xeon E-2436 scores 28530, a 0.2% delta. The Intel Core i5-12600 scores 28646, a -0.3% delta. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Intel Core 5 220H sits in a very dense performance cluster. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X, with no scores, cannot be placed in this cluster from the recorded data.

The single-core results for the Intel part are moderate for its class. A Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1853 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3405 indicate it does not lead in lightly threaded tasks, but the multicore results are stronger relative to its competitors. The 16 threads and 12 cores drive the Cinebench R23 multicore figure to 11198, which is the highest recorded workload score for this chip.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two processors. The Intel Core 5 220H has an extensive recorded benchmark profile with an average score of 28574 and an 80th percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile ranking. Based on the database, the Intel Core 5 220H is the better-documented performer and sits in the upper portion of all CPUs.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X offers architectural advantages that the Intel part lacks: ECC memory support, a 4 nm process, higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz, more PCIe Gen 5 lanes (24 versus 8), and an unlocked multiplier. It also has a larger shared L3 cache at 32 MB versus 18 MB. These features matter for embedded and desktop workloads where memory integrity, expansion, and overclocking are priorities.

The Intel Core 5 220H counters with more cores, more threads, and lower TDP. It draws 45 W versus 65 W, and its 12 cores and 16 threads give it a structural advantage in parallel workloads. The recorded benchmarks confirm that advantage in multicore tests, while the AMD part's performance remains unquantified in the database.

For users who need measured performance, the Intel Core 5 220H is the only option with data. For users who prioritize ECC, PCIe Gen 5 lane count, and a newer process node, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X has the specification lead despite lacking benchmark evidence.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X | Intel Core 5 220H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 3.90 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Granite Ridge | Raptor Lake-H |

| Generation | Ryzen Embedded (Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)) | Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 8,315 million | Not recorded |

| Die size | 70.6 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 32 MB shared | 18 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 24 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 8 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release date | 2025-10-06 | 2024-12-17 |

| Multiplier unlocked | Yes | No |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $342 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 28574 |

| Percentile | 50 | 80 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 220H wins in measured performance. Its average benchmark score of 28574 and 80th percentile ranking place it firmly ahead of the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X's 50th percentile and zero recorded score in the database. Its 12 cores and 16 threads deliver strong multicore results, as shown by Cinebench R23 multicore at 11198 and PassMark multithread at 21884. The 45 W TDP also makes it the lower-power option, which is relevant for mobile or thermally constrained systems.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X wins on platform features. Its 4 nm process at TSMC gives it a manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm node. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is the highest boost speed between the two. ECC memory support makes it suitable for reliability-focused workloads. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide more expansion headroom than the Intel part's 8 lanes. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which the Intel part does not support. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is larger than the Intel part's 18 MB. The dual-channel DDR5 support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth gives it a defined memory throughput figure where the Intel part has none recorded.

For parallel processing, the Intel Core 5 220H is the choice based on core count and benchmark evidence. For embedded deployments requiring ECC, PCIe expansion, and a modern process node, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 9600X offers the specification foundation, though its performance remains unverified in the database.