AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and Intel Core 9 273PTE occupy different positions in the database, with the Intel part showing a much higher overall standing. The Ryzen Embedded 8645HS posts a 50th percentile rank among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE reaches the 82nd percentile. The Intel chip also carries an average benchmark score of 31,143, placing it within a tight cluster of rivals: it sits 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-12700F (31,081), 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS (31,074), 0.4% above the Intel Core i7-13700TE (31,028), and 0.5% below the Intel Core i7-12650HX (31,290). The AMD processor has no recorded benchmarks or rival comparisons in the database, so all quantitative analysis below relies exclusively on the Intel Core 9 273PTE’s measured results and the architectural specifications of both parts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins in every measured workload category present in the database. Its multi-threaded performance is substantial: Cinebench R23 multi-core returns 20,445, Cinebench R20 multi-core returns 8,586, and Cinebench R15 multi-core returns 2,060. PassMark multi-thread shows 24,054, while integer math reaches 82,411 and floating-point math hits 60,673. Data compression scores 258,704, random string sorting scores 28,973, and extended instructions score 15,952. These results indicate that the Intel part handles heavily parallel tasks with clear authority, from rendering to encryption workloads.

Single-threaded performance also favors the Intel Core 9 273PTE. Cinebench R23 single-core records 2,886, Cinebench R20 single-core records 1,212, and Cinebench R15 single-core records 290. PassMark single-thread shows 3,433. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz on the Intel chip supports these results, as does its larger per-core L1 cache of 80 KB and per-core L2 cache of 2 MB.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no benchmark scores in the database, so it cannot claim a win in any measured test. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration and 5.00 GHz boost clock suggest capability in lighter workloads, but the recorded data provides no evidence for a workload-specific advantage. The database shows zero wins for the AMD part and 17 wins for the Intel part across the listed tests.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the stronger processor for any workload represented in the database. Its 12 cores and 24 threads double the AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads, and its 36 MB of shared L3 cache exceeds the AMD’s 16 MB by 20 MB. The Intel part’s 82nd percentile rank versus the AMD’s 50th percentile reinforces this gap. For users prioritizing multi-core rendering, data compression, encryption, or single-thread responsiveness, the Intel Core 9 273PTE’s recorded scores provide concrete evidence of superiority.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be recommended based on measured performance. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC and 178 mm² die size with 25,000 million transistors indicate a modern, efficient design, but efficiency gains do not translate into recorded wins. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel, with no transistor or die size data available. The AMD chip’s 4.30 GHz base clock versus the Intel’s 1.40 GHz base clock suggests better sustained low-load performance, but the Intel’s 5.50 GHz boost clock dominates peak performance.

For a user who requires a desktop processor with active production status, the Intel Core 9 273PTE fits that role. For a user who needs a mobile processor, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS targets that segment. However, the database’s performance records favor the Intel part in every measurable category. The Intel chip also has a launch MSRP of $549, which appears once in this analysis. The AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty and the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no benchmark scores, a direct score comparison is impossible. The Intel Core 9 273PTE’s individual results stand alone. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,445 is the highest multi-core score among its Cinebench entries, while Cinebench R20 multi-core at 8,586 and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,060 follow proportionally. These numbers indicate strong scaling across Cinebench versions.

PassMark results show a similar pattern. Multi-thread at 24,054, integer math at 82,411, and floating-point math at 60,673 all point to high throughput. Data compression at 258,704 is the single highest PassMark score, suggesting the Intel part excels in compression algorithms. Data encryption at 14,253, extended instructions at 15,952, and find prime numbers at 142 are lower but still recorded. Random string sorting at 28,973 and physics at 1,917 complete the PassMark suite.

Single-thread scores are consistent: Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,886, Cinebench R20 single-core at 1,212, Cinebench R15 single-core at 290, and PassMark single-thread at 3,433. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz likely drives these results, as the base clock of 1.40 GHz is low for a desktop chip. The AMD part’s base clock of 4.30 GHz is higher, but without benchmark data, no comparison is possible.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core 9 273PTE provide context. The Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31,081, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 31,074, also 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31,028, 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i7-12650HX scores 31,290, 0.5% higher. These deltas are small, placing the Core 9 273PTE in a competitive middle position among four similar-performing chips.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a 0.50 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile rank in the database?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS ranks in the 50th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, part of the 8000 series. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 178 mm² and 25,000 million transistors. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename under the Core 9 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no transistor or die size data recorded. These process differences indicate that AMD uses a denser, more modern fabrication technology, though the Intel part compensates with a larger core count.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The Intel L3 cache is more than double the AMD’s, and its per-core L1 and L2 caches are larger. This cache advantage likely contributes to the Intel part’s higher single-thread and multi-thread scores.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS includes Radeon 760M, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE includes UHD Graphics 730. PCIe support also differs. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part’s Gen 5 support offers higher potential bandwidth per lane, but the AMD part offers more total lanes.

Memory support diverges: the AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel buses with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part’s memory bus is listed as dual-channel, matching the Intel’s dual-channel configuration.

Specification Differences

The table of differing specifications is concise. Core count: 6 for AMD, 12 for Intel. Thread count: 12 for AMD, 24 for Intel. Base clock: 4.30 GHz for AMD, 1.40 GHz for Intel. Boost clock: 5.00 GHz for AMD, 5.50 GHz for Intel. Process node: 4 nm for AMD, 10 nm for Intel. Foundry: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. Transistors: 25,000 million for AMD, not listed for Intel. Die size: 178 mm² for AMD, not listed for Intel. L1 cache per core: 64 KB for AMD, 80 KB for Intel. L2 cache per core: 1 MB for AMD, 2 MB for Intel. L3 cache shared: 16 MB for AMD, 36 MB for Intel. Memory support: DDR5 for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon 760M for AMD, UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Socket: AMD Socket FP8 for AMD, Intel Socket 1700 for Intel. Market segment: Mobile for AMD, Desktop for Intel. Release date: 2024-04-01 for AMD, 2026-03-08 for Intel. Production status: Active for both. Multiplier unlocked: false for both. The Intel part has a part number of SA4QJ, while the AMD part’s part number is unknown. The AMD part has no launch MSRP, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE also records a 0.2% advantage over the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS in average benchmark score, a relevant comparison since the Ryzen 9 8945HS is an AMD mobile chip. That rival’s score of 31,074 sits just below the Intel Core 9 273PTE’s 31,143, indicating that AMD’s higher-tier mobile parts come close to but do not exceed this Intel desktop chip’s measured performance. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, as a lower-core-count entry, does not appear in that rival list.

The database’s percentile scores place the Intel chip at 82, which is a strong showing, while the AMD chip at 50 is mid-pack. Average benchmark score for the Intel part is 31,143, and the AMD part shows 0 due to missing benchmarks. These two figures summarize the performance gap: the Intel Core 9 273PTE delivers measurable results across 17 tests, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS delivers none. For any user selecting between these two processors, the recorded data points exclusively to the Intel Core 9 273PTE as the higher-performing option.