AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs Intel Core 5 315 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 315 holds the only recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no listed benchmark results. This means the head-to-head comparison is entirely one-sided in terms of available data. The Intel Core 5 315 posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,981 and a single-core score of 1,832. Its Cinebench R20 results show 5,452 multicore and 769 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 1,308 multicore and 184 single-core.

The Intel Core 5 315 achieves an average benchmark score of 18,188 across all recorded tests. This places it at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals confirm its positioning: the AMD EPYC 9274F scores 18,189 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i7-9700 scores 18,180 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i7-1365U scores 18,177 with a 0.1% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700U scores 18,176 with a 0.1% delta. The Intel Core 5 315 effectively sits in a tightly packed performance cluster, essentially tied with all four rivals.

PassMark results for the Intel Core 5 315 show strong throughput in specific workloads. The data compression test records 146,143, while data encryption reaches 11,119. Extended instructions score 13,143, and floating point math posts 42,441. Integer math records 31,690, and the multithread score is 15,272. Physics testing shows 1,163, random string sorting records 17,551, and single-thread performance measures 4,021. The find prime numbers test shows 112.

Because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS lacks any recorded benchmark entries, the database cannot produce a direct performance comparison. The Intel Core 5 315 therefore stands as the only measured participant in this matchup. Its percentile ranking of 72 indicates it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPUs in the database, a notable position for a mobile processor with a 15 watt TDP.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 315 wins every category where data exists. It has recorded scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multicore and single-core tests, plus eight separate PassMark workload tests. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has zero wins because it has zero recorded benchmarks.

For the Intel Core 5 315, the workload split shows particular strength in data compression and floating point math. The compression score of 146,143 dwarfs its integer math score of 31,690, indicating the processor handles compression algorithms far more efficiently than general integer operations. The floating point score of 42,441 also exceeds integer math by a substantial margin, suggesting the Xe3 integrated graphics or the CPU's arithmetic units accelerate floating-point workloads effectively.

The single-thread PassMark score of 4,021 demonstrates competitive per-core performance despite the modest 1.50 GHz base clock. The boost clock of 4.40 GHz helps close the gap, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,832 confirms this pattern.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS cannot be assigned any workload wins based on the database. Its specifications suggest it would compete in different areas, but without measurements, any such claim would lack support. The database records only what it measures, and it measures nothing for this AMD part.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 315?

A: The Intel Core 5 315 has an average benchmark score of 18,188 across all recorded tests.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 315 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is statistically tied with all four nearest rivals. The AMD EPYC 9274F and Intel Core i7-9700 both score within 0% delta, while the Intel Core i7-1365U and AMD Ryzen 7 5700U are each 0.1% behind.

Q: What percentile does the Intel Core 5 315 achieve?

A: It sits at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS.

Q: What is the best Cinebench result for the Intel Core 5 315?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12,981 is its highest Cinebench result, followed by R20 multicore at 5,452 and R15 multicore at 1,308.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 315 perform in PassMark single-thread tests?

A: It scores 4,021 in both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread tests, which are recorded as identical values.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 315 uses 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

The TDP figures diverge sharply: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS consumes 45 watts, while the Intel Core 5 315 consumes 15 watts. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1516.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part.

PCIe lanes also differ. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel Core 5 315 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 315 is $340. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Intel Core 5 315 has a part number of SAEFC, while the AMD part lists its part number as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS belongs to the 8000 series and uses Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename. The Intel Core 5 315 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation.

The process nodes differ. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with 25,000 million transistors and a die size of 178 mm². The Intel part uses a 3 nm process from Intel, but the database records no transistor count or die size for it.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 315 has 192 KB of L1 cache total, 2.5 MB of L2 cache total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses Radeon 760M graphics, while the Intel part uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Both processors are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part has a release date of 2024-04-01, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-04-15.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 315 does not. The AMD part also has a dual-channel memory bus compared to the Intel part's single-channel bus.

The Verdict

The database records no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, which means any performance comparison relies entirely on the Intel Core 5 315's measured results. The Intel part delivers an average score of 18,188 and ranks at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD EPYC 9274F and Intel Core i7-9700, sit within 0.1% of its score, indicating the Core 5 315 performs at a level comparable to those established desktop and mobile parts.

The Intel Core 5 315 achieves this with a 15 watt TDP, a single-channel memory bus, and 6 MB of L3 cache. Its boost clock of 4.40 GHz compensates for a 1.50 GHz base clock, and the benchmark data confirms strong single-thread performance in both Cinebench and PassMark tests.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS offers a 45 watt TDP, 12 threads, 16 MB of L3 cache, dual-channel memory, ECC support, and 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. These specifications suggest a different design target: higher power envelope, more simultaneous threads, and broader I/O capabilities. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 4.30 GHz base clock indicate a processor tuned for consistent high-frequency operation.

Without benchmark measurements for the AMD part, the database cannot confirm whether its architectural advantages translate into better performance. The Intel Core 5 315 stands as the only measured option in this comparison, and its scores indicate a capable mobile processor that competes with the top-tier parts in its percentile range.

Users seeking a processor with recorded performance data should consider the Intel Core 5 315. Users prioritizing ECC memory support, dual-channel bandwidth, 20 PCIe lanes, or 12 threads must rely on the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS specifications, but they should note that no benchmark verification exists for that part in the database.