AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 211TE?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS boosts to 5.00 GHz, whereas the Intel Core 5 211TE boosts to 4.80 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 4.30 GHz compared to the Intel's 1.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE records an average benchmark score of 15370, placing it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has an average score of 0 in the database, with a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 211TE support ECC memory.

Q: What process nodes are used by these two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 211TE have a TDP of 45 watts.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 211TE represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, which results in a die size of 178 mm² and integrates 25,000 million transistors. The Intel Core 5 211TE, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a larger die size of 215 mm². The database does not list a transistor count for the Intel part.

The core configurations differ significantly. AMD pairs 6 cores with 12 threads, while Intel offers 10 cores and 16 threads. The larger core count on the Intel side suggests a design aimed at parallel workloads, whereas AMD's higher clocks indicate a focus on single-thread responsiveness. Cache hierarchies also diverge: AMD provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3, giving Intel a larger total cache footprint.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip supports only DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, but its recorded bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics solutions are distinct: AMD uses the Radeon 760M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 730. The PCIe implementations also differ. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip is designated for the mobile market segment on AMD Socket FP8, whereas the Intel chip is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700. Both are locked (multiplier unlocked: false) and are currently in active production.

The release dates differ by roughly nine months. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS launched on 2024-04-01, while the Intel Core 5 211TE launched on 2025-01-12.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete set of benchmark scores for the Intel Core 5 211TE, but no recorded benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS. Consequently, the head-to-head comparison relies on the Intel part's measured results and its standing against near rivals, rather than direct matches.

For the Intel Core 5 211TE, Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12201, with a single-core score of 1722. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 5124 and single-core is 723. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1229 and single-core is 173. These scores show a strong multicore advantage relative to its single-core results, consistent with its 10-core, 16-thread configuration.

Passmark results for the Intel part include a multithread score of 11685 and a single-thread score of 1408. The integer math score is 33991, floating point math is 26150, and extended instructions score is 8615. Data compression scores 133434, data encryption scores 7231, and random string sorting scores 14838. The find prime numbers test yields 72, and the physics test scores 1278.

The Intel Core 5 211TE has an average benchmark score of 15370, which places it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The AMD EPYC 7543 has an average score of 15477, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 3 7440U scores 15682, which is 2% higher. On the lower side, the AMD EPYC 7702P scores 15130, which is 1.6% lower, and the Intel Core i3-1315U scores 15022, which is 2.3% lower. The data shows the Intel Core 5 211TE sitting in a tightly contested band, within roughly 2% of each of these rivals.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no benchmark scores recorded in the database and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, but without measured results, the data does not support any performance conclusions for the AMD part beyond its architectural specifications.

Specification Differences

The following fields show differences between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS and the Intel Core 5 211TE:

• Cores: AMD 6 vs Intel 10
• Threads: AMD 12 vs Intel 16
• Base Clock: AMD 4.30 GHz vs Intel 1.70 GHz
• Boost Clock: AMD 5.00 GHz vs Intel 4.80 GHz
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 vs Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture/Codename: Zen 4 (Hawk Point) vs Bartlett Lake
• Process Node: 4 nm (TSMC) vs 10 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC vs Intel
• Transistors: 25,000 million vs not listed
• Die Size: 178 mm² vs 215 mm²
• L1 Cache (per core): 64 KB vs 80 KB
• L2 Cache (per core): 1 MB vs 1.25 MB
• L3 Cache (shared): 16 MB vs 20 MB
• Memory Support: DDR5 only vs DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) vs Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 760M vs UHD Graphics 730
• Market Segment: Mobile vs Desktop
• Release Date: 2024-04-01 vs 2025-01-12
• Part Number: unknown vs SRQDL
• Launch MSRP: not listed vs $221

Fields that are the same include TDP (45 watts), dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, and the fact that both have locked multipliers. Both are also listed as active in production.

The Verdict

The recorded data presents an unbalanced comparison because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS has no benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has a full set of measurements. For the Intel part, the evidence is clear: an average benchmark score of 15370 places it in the 69th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals confirm a competitive position, with the AMD EPYC 7543 less than 1% higher and the Intel Core i3-1315U 2.3% lower. The Intel Core 5 211TE delivers strong multicore throughput, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12201 versus a single-core score of 1722.

From a specification standpoint, the Intel chip offers more cores, more threads, larger caches at every level, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It also uses PCIe Gen 5. The AMD chip counters with higher clock speeds, a smaller process node, higher memory bandwidth, and a more compact die. The AMD part's clock advantage (4.30 GHz base, 5.00 GHz boost vs 1.70 GHz base, 4.80 GHz boost) suggests strong single-thread potential, but the database provides no measured scores to confirm it.

For a user selecting based on available benchmark evidence, the Intel Core 5 211TE is the only part with quantifiable performance. Its 69th percentile ranking and proximity to server-class EPYC parts in average score indicate a capable multicore processor. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8645HS, without recorded scores, cannot be assessed on performance. Its architectural merits, such as the 4 nm process and higher clocks, are notable, but the data does not support a performance verdict.

The market segments differ as well: the AMD part targets mobile, while the Intel part is a desktop chip. The Intel part has a stated launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD part has no listed price. The data therefore points to the Intel Core 5 211TE as the choice for users who require measured performance and a desktop form factor, while the AMD part remains a specification-driven option without empirical validation in this database.