AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U and the Intel Core i5-14490F. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has recorded benchmark scores in the item records. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U shows an average benchmark score of 0, while the Intel Core i5-14490F carries a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results. This asymmetry means the only measurable performance data available comes from the Intel side, and the AMD side offers no comparable figures for direct analysis.

What the data does show is how the Intel Core i5-14490F positions itself against its own nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 38149 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The closest competitor, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, scores 38194, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the i5-14490F trails by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i5-13600KF scores 38103, putting the i5-14490F ahead by 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a 0.2 percent lead over the i5-14490F, and the Intel Core i5-13600HX scores 38261, a 0.3 percent advantage. These margins are tight, all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the i5-14490F sits squarely in a competitive cluster of mid-range processors.

Looking at the Intel processor's individual benchmark results, the multi-core Cinebench scores show significant capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result is 23000, while the single-core result is 3247. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score reaches 9660, with a single-core score of 1363. The Cinebench R15 multi-core result is 2318, and the single-core result is 327. These figures indicate a processor that scales well across increasing thread counts, as the multi-core scores grow proportionally with each newer Cinebench version.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The multithread score is 28662, while the single-thread score is 3873. Data compression scores 340026, and data encryption scores 18225. Extended instructions hit 21731, floating-point math reaches 66558, and integer math scores 87844. The find prime numbers test returns 122, physics scores 2093, and random string sorting scores 35608. The gap between the multithread score and the single-thread score, roughly 7.4 times, reflects the 10-core, 16-thread configuration's ability to distribute work effectively across its hybrid core layout.

Since the AMD processor has no benchmark records, no wins can be attributed to either side in a head-to-head sense. The data instead invites a comparative analysis based on specifications, architecture, and the Intel processor's measured performance relative to its peer group.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses a 10 nm process from Intel. This node difference has direct implications for transistor density and power efficiency, though the Intel processor's larger die size of 215 mm² versus AMD's 178 mm² suggests a different physical design approach.

The AMD processor is built on Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 8000 series. The Intel processor uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, under the Core 14th Gen series. The AMD side integrates 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel side offers 10 cores and 16 threads, a substantial advantage in raw thread count.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor's larger L3 cache, 24 MB versus 16 MB, gives it more on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which can benefit multi-threaded workloads that share data across cores.

The AMD processor is built for mobile and embedded use, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems. The AMD chip's socket is AMD Socket FP8, a mobile package, whereas the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The AMD processor's power envelope is 28 watts TDP, while the Intel processor draws 65 watts TDP, more than double the thermal budget.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for it. ECC memory support is present on the AMD side but absent on the Intel side, which matters for embedded and server-adjacent workloads where data integrity is critical.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel side's newer PCIe generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, though the AMD side provides more total lanes.

Integrated graphics separate the two clearly. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU, while the Intel processor has no integrated graphics at all. For systems that require display output without a discrete GPU, the AMD chip has a built-in path, while the Intel chip requires a separate graphics card.

The AMD processor's transistor count is recorded at 25,000 million, while the Intel processor's transistor count is not listed. This missing figure makes direct comparison of transistor density impossible from the available data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel processor holds a 4-core and 4-thread advantage.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD processor consumes less than half the thermal power of the Intel processor.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-14490F does not list ECC memory support in the database.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U includes a Radeon 760M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14490F boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a 0.10 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD processor's node is smaller, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category recorded in the database. Core count: 6 for AMD versus 10 for Intel. Thread count: 12 versus 16. Base clock: 3.50 GHz for AMD versus 2.50 GHz for Intel, a 1.00 GHz advantage for the AMD chip at base frequency. Boost clock: 4.90 GHz for AMD versus 5.00 GHz for Intel, a 0.10 GHz advantage for the Intel chip at peak frequency.

TDP: 28 watts for AMD versus 65 watts for Intel. Socket: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Zen 4 versus Raptor Lake. Codename: Hawk Point versus Raptor Lake-R. Process node: 4 nm versus 10 nm. Foundry: TSMC versus Intel. Transistors: 25,000 million for AMD, no figure recorded for Intel. Die size: 178 mm² for AMD versus 215 mm² for Intel.

Cache layout: L1 cache is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB shared for AMD versus 24 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support: DDR5 only for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s recorded for AMD, no figure for Intel. ECC memory: true for AMD, false for Intel. PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon 760M for AMD versus N/A for Intel. Market segment: Mobile for AMD versus Desktop for Intel. Release date: 2024-04-01 for AMD versus 2023-12-31 for Intel. Part number: unknown for AMD versus SRN35 for Intel.

The Verdict

The data presents two processors with fundamentally different design targets. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U is a mobile and embedded-oriented chip with a 28 watt TDP, integrated Radeon 760M graphics, ECC memory support, and a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14490F is a desktop processor with a 65 watt TDP, no integrated graphics, no ECC support, and a 10 nm process from Intel. The Intel chip offers 10 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, a larger 24 MB L3 cache versus 16 MB, and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. The AMD chip offers a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 2.50 GHz, a smaller die size, and lower power consumption.

For workloads that prioritize thread count, cache capacity, and peak single-core boost, the Intel Core i5-14490F has the specification advantage. Its 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38149, confirms that it performs competitively against its nearest rivals, all within 0.3 percent of its score. The Intel chip's benchmark data, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and a PassMark multithread score of 28662, shows strong multi-threaded capability.

For embedded deployments, mobile systems, or applications that need integrated graphics, ECC memory, and minimal power draw, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U is the only choice between the two, since the Intel chip lacks all three features. The AMD chip's 28 watt TDP makes it suitable for thermally constrained environments, and its 4 nm process from TSMC suggests a denser, more power-efficient design.

The database records no benchmark scores for the AMD processor, so direct performance comparison is impossible from the available data. The Intel processor's measured results stand alone, while the AMD processor's performance remains unquantified. This absence of data means the verdict rests on specification differences and the Intel processor's demonstrated performance within its peer group.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in scenarios that demand high multi-threaded throughput. Its 10 cores and 16 threads, combined with 24 MB of L3 cache, support heavy parallel workloads. The recorded Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23000 and PassMark multithread score of 28662 quantify this strength. The Intel chip also wins on peak clock speed, with a 5.00 GHz boost clock that edges out the AMD chip's 4.90 GHz. Desktop users with access to a discrete GPU will not miss integrated graphics, and the Intel chip's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers platform flexibility.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U wins in power-constrained and feature-specific scenarios. Its 28 watt TDP is less than half the Intel chip's 65 watts, making it the appropriate choice for embedded or mobile systems where thermal and power budgets are limited. The integrated Radeon 760M GPU eliminates the need for a separate graphics card in display-output applications. ECC memory support provides error correction for data-sensitive workloads, a feature the Intel chip lacks. The AMD chip's 4 nm process node from TSMC and smaller 178 mm² die size indicate a more compact, potentially more efficient physical design. Its higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 2.50 GHz suggests better performance at lower utilization levels, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The Intel processor's 86th percentile ranking and its tight competitive cluster, with nearest rivals within 0.3 percent, indicate that it performs at a level consistent with other mid-range desktop processors. The AMD processor has no percentile ranking data beyond its 50th percentile baseline, which reflects the absence of benchmark scores rather than a measured performance level. For users who need a desktop processor with proven multi-threaded performance, the Intel chip has the recorded data to support its selection. For users who need a low-power embedded processor with graphics and ECC support, the AMD chip has the specification profile to match that requirement.