AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Intel Core 7 253PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U

CORE STATE Hawk Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,507
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,449
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,475
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
24,880
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,512
passmark_data_compression
N/A
339,133
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
18,385
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
21,806
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
138
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
80,870
passmark_integer_math
N/A
114,158
passmark_multithread
N/A
29,271
passmark_physics
N/A
1,845
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
32,777
passmark_single_thread
N/A
3,955
passmark_singlethread
N/A
3,955

Analysis: AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U vs Intel Core 7 253PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive advantage for the Intel Core 7 253PE in every measured benchmark category. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has no benchmark scores in the database, leaving all head-to-head comparisons based on the Intel part’s recorded performance and the architectural parameters of the AMD chip. The Intel Core 7 253PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880, while its single-core result reaches 3512. In Cinebench R20, the same processor produces 10449 multi-core and 1475 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2507 multi-core and 354 single-core. These numbers indicate a strong multi-threaded presence, with the R23 multi-core score exceeding 20,000 points, which places the chip in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The PassMark suite further confirms the Intel processor’s capabilities. The multi-thread score of 29271 and the single-thread score of 3955 show consistent performance across synthetic workloads. The integer math test returns 114158, floating point math reaches 80870, and extended instructions score 21806. Data compression hits 339133, while data encryption records 18385. Finding prime numbers yields 138, physics simulation scores 1845, and random string sorting produces 32777. The average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 253PE is 40557, which places it near its closest rivals. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40585, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the two are nearly identical. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518, a delta of 0.1 percent, again a negligible difference. The Intel Xeon 6357P scores 40630, a delta of -0.2 percent, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40431, a delta of 0.3 percent. The Intel Core 7 253PE sits within a narrow band of performance relative to these four rivals, with the largest gap being only 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and 0.2 percent behind the Intel Xeon 6357P.

Since the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has no benchmark scores recorded, the database cannot provide direct head-to-head numbers. The AMD chip’s percentile against all CPUs is 50, which is significantly lower than the Intel part’s 87. The Intel Core 7 253PE also holds a higher average benchmark score of 40557, whereas the AMD chip’s average is zero due to missing data. The wins count shows 0 for the AMD side and 0 for the Intel side, reflecting the absence of a direct comparison. The data indicates that the Intel processor, based on its recorded scores, would dominate in any synthetic benchmark, but the lack of AMD results prevents a numeric comparison. The Intel chip’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 24880 is nearly 2.4 times its single-core score of 3512, suggesting strong scaling across its cores. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29271 versus single-thread 3955 shows a ratio of about 7.4, which aligns with a high-core-count design.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the only processor with measured performance, and it demonstrates a clear lead in every benchmark category. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has no scores in the database, so any verdict must rely on the Intel chip’s results and the architectural specifications of both parts. The Intel processor’s 87th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database, while the AMD chip’s 50th percentile suggests it sits near the median, though this percentile is based on no actual benchmark data. The Intel Core 7 253PE achieves an average benchmark score of 40557, which is within 0.3 percent of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H. This proximity to rival scores shows that the Intel part is competitive in its class, but not a standout outlier.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has a lower core count at 6 cores and 12 threads, a lower base clock of 3.50 GHz, and a lower boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to the Intel chip’s 10 cores, 20 threads, 2.50 GHz base, and 5.50 GHz boost. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 watts, indicating a higher power envelope for the Intel part. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm node from Intel. These architectural differences suggest that the Intel chip trades power efficiency for raw performance, and the benchmark data confirms that trade-off. The Intel chip’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24880 is indicative of heavy multi-threaded workloads, while its single-core score of 3512 shows strong per-thread performance.

Strictly from the data, the Intel Core 7 253PE is the choice for any workload that relies on multi-threaded processing, as evidenced by its high Cinebench and PassMark scores. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot be recommended based on measured performance. The Intel chip’s 87th percentile and average score of 40557 place it in the upper tier of the database, while the AMD chip’s 50th percentile (without data) implies a mid-range position, but that is unverified. The Intel processor also has a higher boost clock of 5.50 GHz, which likely contributes to its single-thread lead, though no direct comparison exists. The AMD chip’s lower TDP and smaller process node suggest a power-efficient design, but efficiency does not translate into benchmark wins without scores.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. The Intel Core 7 253PE is part of the Core 7 line and uses the Bartlett Lake codename, with no specific architecture name listed. The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm node from Intel. The AMD processor packs 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, whereas the Intel chip has no transistor or die size data in the database. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 10 cores and 20 threads, a 4-core and 8-thread difference. The AMD chip’s base clock is 3.50 GHz, and its boost clock is 4.90 GHz. The Intel chip’s base clock is 2.50 GHz, but its boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz, a 0.60 GHz advantage over the AMD part.

Cache configurations differ notably. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel chip more than double the L3 cache (33 MB versus 16 MB) and double the L2 per core (2 MB versus 1 MB). The larger cache hierarchy on the Intel chip likely contributes to its higher benchmark scores, particularly in memory-intensive workloads like data compression, which scored 339133 in PassMark. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses and have the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported by both chips.

The AMD chip uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip has PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the Intel chip offers higher bandwidth per lane, though the lane count is lower. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip uses Radeon 760M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip is classified as a mobile segment part, while the Intel chip is classified as a desktop part. The AMD chip was released on 2024-04-01, while the Intel chip was released on 2026-03-08, a difference of nearly two years. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, a 0.60 GHz difference in favor of the Intel chip.

Q: Does the AMD chip have a smaller process node?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 253PE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel part?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average benchmark score of 40557, and it is within 0.3 percent of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H at 40431.

Q: Which chip has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U and the Intel Core 7 253PE support ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 253PE wins in every benchmark category that has scores. The PassMark data compression score of 339133 indicates a strong showing in file compression and decompression tasks, likely aided by the larger 33 MB L3 cache. The data encryption score of 18385 suggests capability in cryptographic workloads, while the extended instructions score of 21806 shows proficiency in SIMD and vector processing. The floating point math score of 80870 and integer math score of 114158 point to strong arithmetic performance, which is typical for a 10-core, 20-thread processor. The physics simulation score of 1845 and the random string sorting score of 32777 further confirm multi-threaded strength. The single-thread score of 3955 indicates that even single-threaded applications will run well, thanks to the 5.50 GHz boost clock.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U, with no benchmark scores, has no recorded wins in the database. However, its architectural specifications suggest potential advantages in specific areas. The AMD chip has a lower TDP of 28 watts compared to the Intel chip’s 65 watts, which indicates lower power consumption. The 4 nm process node from TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, suggests a denser and potentially more power-efficient design. The AMD chip’s Radeon 760M integrated graphics may offer better graphical performance than the Intel UHD Graphics 730, though no benchmark data supports this. The AMD chip also supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is more lanes than the Intel chip’s 16 lanes, though the Intel chip uses the faster PCIe Gen 5 standard. The AMD chip’s mobile segment classification and lower TDP make it suited for embedded or power-constrained environments, while the Intel chip’s desktop classification and higher TDP target performance-oriented systems.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8640U has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The base clock differs: 3.50 GHz for the AMD chip versus 2.50 GHz for the Intel chip. The boost clock differs: 4.90 GHz for the AMD chip versus 5.50 GHz for the Intel chip. The TDP differs significantly: 28 watts for the AMD chip versus 65 watts for the Intel chip. The socket types differ: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD chip versus Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel chip. The process nodes differ: 4 nm for the AMD chip versus 10 nm for the Intel chip. The foundries differ: TSMC for the AMD chip versus Intel for the Intel chip.

The cache hierarchy differs across all levels. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs: the AMD chip supports only DDR5, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both have dual-channel memory buses and the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe support differs: the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 760M on the AMD chip versus UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel chip. The market segment differs: mobile for the AMD chip versus desktop for the Intel chip. The release dates differ: 2024-04-01 for the AMD chip versus 2026-03-08 for the Intel chip. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. The part number for the Intel chip is SA4QE, while the AMD chip’s part number is unknown. The Intel chip has a production status of Active, and the AMD chip also has a production status of Active. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel chip’s generation is listed as Core 7 (Bartlett Lake), while the AMD chip’s generation is Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)). The Intel chip has no transistors or die size data, while the AMD chip has 25,000 million transistors and a 178 mm² die. The AMD chip’s series is 8000 series, while the Intel chip has no series listed. The AMD chip’s architecture is Zen 4, while the Intel chip has no architecture listed.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Embedded 8640U
7 253PE
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.5
2.5 -28.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.5 +12.2%
Frequency (GHz)
3.5
2.5 -28.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
5.5 +12.2%
Multiplier
35
25 -28.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
65 W
PL2
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-30 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Codename
Hawk Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
25,000 million
Die Size
178 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 16 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 760M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$384
Part Number
unknown
SA4QE
Package
FP8, FP7, FP7r2
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen Embedded 8640U Details View Core 7 253PE Details