AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 and the Intel Processor 300T. Both processors have empty benchmark arrays, zero average benchmark scores, and no nearest rival entries. This absence of data means a direct performance comparison cannot be established through measured results.

What the recorded data does show is a structural comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T uses 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock. The core count difference is substantial, a sixfold increase in cores and threads for the AMD processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 carries a TDP of 55, while the Intel Processor 300T carries a TDP of 35. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment. Both processors are marked as Active in production status.

Neither processor has recorded benchmark wins. The winsA and winsB fields both show zero. The percentileVsAllCpus field for both processors shows 50, which places them at the median of all CPUs in the database, though this is a static field and not derived from actual benchmark runs.

The absence of benchmark data prevents any quantitative head-to-head analysis. The database shows no scores, no deltas, no percentile comparisons beyond the static median value. Every performance claim would require numbers not present in the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores, wins cannot be assigned. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 and the Intel Processor 300T each have zero recorded wins. The data indicates no measured scenario where either processor outperforms the other.

The architectural differences suggest distinct use cases, but these are not backed by benchmark results. The AMD processor offers 12 cores, 24 threads, and a 64 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 2 cores, 4 threads, and a 6 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded memory bandwidth.

The AMD processor includes Radeon 8050S integrated graphics. The Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 710. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports overclocking.

The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP11 and is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD processor has a die size of 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel processor has a die size of 163 mm².

The AMD processor supports ECC memory, while the Intel processor does not. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

These differences point toward the AMD processor handling heavier multi-threaded workloads due to its core count and cache size. The Intel processor, with fewer cores and a higher base clock, may suit lighter tasks. But the database contains no benchmark data to confirm either position.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 is built on the Gorgon Halo codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation based on Zen 5 architecture. It uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The die size is recorded as 2x 70.6 mm², indicating a dual-die configuration.

The Intel Processor 300T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. It belongs to the Intel Processor generation based on Raptor Lake. It uses a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel. The die size is recorded as 163 mm², a single monolithic die.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor's L3 cache is over ten times larger than the Intel processor's L3 cache.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory exclusively, with a quad-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus and no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Intel processor. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe generation on the Intel part offers higher potential bandwidth, though no measured data confirms real-world impact.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor uses Radeon 8050S, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 710. Both are integrated solutions with no benchmark scores recorded in the database.

The release dates show the Intel Processor 300T launched on 2024-01-07, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 launched on 2026-05-19. The AMD part is newer by over two years. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $82, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The memory bus width difference, quad-channel versus dual-channel, combined with the L3 cache size difference, points to substantially different memory and cache architectures. The AMD processor's 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth is recorded, while the Intel processor's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data cannot support a definitive performance verdict. Both processors have zero benchmark scores, zero head-to-head results, and zero nearest rivals. The percentileVsAllCpus field shows 50 for both, but this is a static median value rather than a measured result.

What the data does show is a clear segmentation. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 is a mobile processor with 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 64 MB of L3 cache, and quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Processor 300T is a desktop processor with 2 cores, 4 threads, a 3.40 GHz base clock, 6 MB of shared L3 cache, and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support.

The AMD processor targets workloads requiring high core counts, large caches, and high memory bandwidth. The Intel processor targets workloads requiring lower power consumption, a TDP of 35, and a simpler dual-core design with a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz.

The absence of benchmark data means no measured winner exists. The database records no wins for either processor. Users seeking a verdict must rely on the architectural data alone, which favors the AMD processor in multi-threaded scenarios and the Intel processor in power-constrained desktop scenarios.

The Intel Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has no recorded launch MSRP.

The production status for both processors is Active. The AMD processor's release date is 2026-05-19, and the Intel processor's release date is 2024-01-07.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded boost clock in the database.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300T has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 | Intel Processor 300T |

|-------|--------------------------|----------------------|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 12 | 2 |

| Threads | 24 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 55 | 35 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Halo | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.1 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8050S | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $82 |

| Part Number | 100-000002141 | SRN3K |