AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 vs Intel Core i9-14900 Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data in the database draws a clear divide between these two processors. The Intel Core i9-14900 holds every recorded benchmark win, with all 19 test scores coming from its side of the comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so the wins column remains empty for it. This does not mean the AMD part is uncompetitive in absolute terms; it simply means the database currently lacks measured results for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 across the standard test suite.

What the data does show is where the Core i9-14900 excels. The Intel processor posts strong results across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multi-core and single-core tests, along with Geekbench scores and a full Passmark suite. The multi-core Cinebench numbers are particularly noteworthy: the R23 multi-core score of 31070 places it in the upper tier of desktop processors, while the single-core R23 score of 2212 indicates solid per-thread performance. The Passmark integer math score of 175010 and floating point score of 120262 suggest the Core i9-14900 handles compute-heavy workloads with ease.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490, the absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm any specific wins. The specification sheet, however, points toward different strengths. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD processor carries 64 MB of L3 cache, nearly double the Intel's 36 MB, and supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. These specifications suggest the AMD part may perform well in memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but without recorded benchmarks, that remains speculative.

The Core i9-14900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 58115. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58323 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D at 58386 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 at 58504 (0.7% higher). The AMD EPYC 9015 trails at 57555, which is 1% lower. These tight margins place the Core i9-14900 in a competitive cluster of high-end processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part offers double the core count.

Q: What is the clock speed difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i9-14900 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The Intel part boosts higher, while the AMD part has a faster base clock.

Q: How do their cache sizes compare?

A: Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i9-14900 supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and the database does not list a bandwidth figure for it.

Q: What are the socket requirements?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses AMD Socket FP11, which is a mobile socket. The Intel Core i9-14900 uses Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop socket.

Q: Which processor has a higher overall benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 sits at the 50th percentile, though it has no recorded benchmark scores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors. All recorded scores belong to the Intel Core i9-14900. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 stands as the most prominent result, indicating strong parallel processing capability. The single-core R23 score of 2212 shows respectable per-thread performance, though not class-leading.

In Geekbench, the Core i9-14900 records a multi-core score of 18495 and a single-core score of 2488. These numbers place it in the upper range of desktop processors. The Passmark suite adds further detail: multithread score of 44578, single-thread score of 4323, and physics score of 2486. The data compression score of 550271 and encryption score of 33540 indicate strong throughput in those specific workloads.

The extended instructions score of 30624 and find prime numbers score of 188 round out the Passmark results. Random string sorting at 61060 completes the suite. Since the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has no recorded scores, the database cannot quantify any performance gap, favorable or unfavorable, between the two parts.

The Core i9-14900's average benchmark score of 58115 places it among a tight cluster of rivals. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555, which is 1% lower. This clustering suggests the Core i9-14900 performs within a narrow band of high-end server and workstation processors.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 and Intel Core i9-14900 differ across nearly every major specification category.

Cores and threads: The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Clock speeds: The AMD part runs at 3.20 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The Intel part runs at 2.00 GHz base and 5.80 GHz boost.

Thermal design power: The AMD part has a TDP of 55 watts. The Intel part has a TDP of 65 watts.

Socket: The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Die size: The AMD part has a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel part has a single die of 257 mm².

Cache: The AMD part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

Memory support: The AMD part supports LPDDR5X with quad-channel bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bus and no listed bandwidth.

PCIe support: The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics: The AMD part includes Radeon 8050S. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770.

Market segment: The AMD part targets mobile devices. The Intel part targets desktop systems.

Release date: The AMD part released on 2026-05-19. The Intel part released on 2024-01-07.

Part number: The AMD part is 100-000002141. The Intel part is SRN3V.

Multiplier unlocked: Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Launch MSRP: The Intel Core i9-14900 has a launch MSRP of $549. The AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between these two processors reflects different design philosophies and target markets.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5. The 4 nm process node from TSMC represents a leading-edge fabrication technology. The 64 MB L3 cache is a substantial pool for a mobile processor, and the quad-channel LPDDR5X memory controller with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth suggests the design prioritizes memory throughput. The 2x 70.6 mm² die size indicates a chiplet-based or multi-die design, which is consistent with AMD's recent architecture directions. The integrated Radeon 8050S graphics and the mobile market segment position this part for laptops and portable workstations.

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Raptor Lake codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The 10 nm process node from Intel is older relative to the AMD's 4 nm node. The 36 MB shared L3 cache is smaller, but the 2 MB L2 cache per core is larger than the AMD's 1 MB per core. The dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offering flexibility but lower peak bandwidth compared to the AMD's quad-channel LPDDR5X setup. The 257 mm² die size reflects a monolithic design. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU and desktop market segment position this part for traditional desktop towers and workstations.

The PCIe generation difference is notable: the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4. Both provide 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part's newer PCIe standard offers higher bandwidth for expansion cards and storage devices, though the AMD part's higher memory bandwidth may benefit certain compute workloads.

The release dates also reflect different product cycles. The Intel part launched in January 2024, while the AMD part is scheduled for May 2026. This two-year gap means the AMD part benefits from newer process technology and architectural improvements, while the Intel part has a longer track record in the market.