AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark comparisons for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 and the Intel Core i5-14400. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters for both processors read zero. Consequently, a direct score-by-score comparison cannot be constructed from the recorded data.

What the database does provide is a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core i5-14400, alongside its percentile ranking and average score. The Intel part records a percentile of 82 across all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 32,115. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-12800H with an average score of 32,121 (a delta of 0 percent), the Intel Core i7-13705H at 32,076 (delta 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-14450HX at 32,040 (delta 0.2 percent), and the Intel Core i9-11900 at 32,226 (delta -0.3 percent). These deltas are essentially negligible, placing the i5-14400 in a tightly clustered performance band.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490, the database records an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile of 50. No individual benchmark scores exist for this part. The absence of measurements means the AMD processor cannot be compared numerically against the Intel chip in any workload category. The data gap is significant: without benchmark entries, the AMD part's actual performance remains unquantified in this database.

The Intel i5-14400's benchmark results, however, provide a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21,315 in multicore and 3,009 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 8,952 multicore and 1,263 single-core. Cinebench R15 records 2,148 multicore and 303 single-core. Geekbench results are 9,807 multicore and 1,905 single-core. PassMark tests include a multithread score of 25,080, a single-thread score of 3,741, integer math at 82,017, floating-point math at 61,549, data compression at 314,995, data encryption at 16,731, extended instructions at 19,816, physics at 1,396, and random string sorting at 32,346. The find prime numbers score is 80.

These numbers establish the i5-14400 as a solid mid-range desktop performer. The multicore scores indicate strong parallel throughput, while the single-core figures show respectable per-thread execution. The PassMark multithread score of 25,080 and integer math score of 82,017 point to robust general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 314,995 is notably high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance for that workload.

The AMD part's lack of benchmark data means the head-to-head section must remain inconclusive. The database simply does not contain the measurements required to determine which processor wins in any test. The winsA and winsB counters both remain at zero, reflecting this absence of comparative data.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their fundamental architecture. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses the codename Gorgon Halo and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400 uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process node at its own foundry.

The die sizes differ considerably. The AMD processor uses a dual-die configuration with each die measuring 70.6 mm², for a combined 2x 70.6 mm² arrangement. The Intel processor uses a single die measuring 215 mm². This structural difference reflects the distinct manufacturing approaches of the two companies.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors share the same L1 cache size of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a major difference. AMD offers 64 MB of L3 cache, while Intel offers 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger L3 cache could benefit workloads that repeatedly access a sizable working set.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database. The AMD part's quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration provides substantially higher theoretical bandwidth than the Intel part's dual-channel setup.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available for the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, while the AMD part's older generation provides the same lane count.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 8050S, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so their relative graphics performance cannot be quantified here.

The market segments differ. The AMD processor targets the mobile segment, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment. This positioning affects socket types: AMD uses Socket FP11, while Intel uses Socket 1700. Both processors support ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

Without head-to-head benchmark data, the analysis of where each processor wins must rely on architectural characteristics rather than measured scores.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 wins on core and thread count. It offers 12 cores and 24 threads, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400's 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part provides 20 percent more cores and 50 percent more threads. In threaded workloads that scale with core count, the AMD processor holds an architectural advantage. Its 64 MB L3 cache also exceeds the Intel part's 20 MB by a factor of three, which could benefit cache-sensitive applications. The quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface with 273.1 GB/s bandwidth represents a substantial advantage for memory-intensive workloads such as data processing or large in-memory datasets. The 4 nm TSMC process node suggests greater power efficiency per transistor, though the database records no power consumption measurements to confirm this.

The Intel Core i5-14400 wins on PCIe generation, offering Gen 5 connectivity versus the AMD part's Gen 4. This provides an advantage for workloads that leverage high-bandwidth PCIe devices such as modern GPUs or NVMe storage. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering broader compatibility with existing memory modules. Its dual-channel configuration is simpler but may be sufficient for many desktop workloads. The Intel part's 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache slightly exceeds the AMD part's 1 MB per core, which could benefit single-threaded workloads with moderate working sets. The Intel part's higher base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while lower than the AMD part's 3.20 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, still represents strong clock performance for desktop use. The Intel part's 65 W TDP, while higher than the AMD part's 55 W TDP, reflects its desktop positioning where cooling is less constrained.

The database records no measured benchmark wins for either processor. The winsA and winsB counters both sit at zero. The architectural analysis above provides a qualitative assessment, but the absence of benchmark data means no definitive workload-specific victories can be assigned.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The table below summarizes the fields where the two parts diverge.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 | Intel Core i5-14400 |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Not recorded | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 12 | 10 |

| Threads | 24 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.1 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8050S | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $221 |

| Part Number | 100-000002141 | SRN3QSRN46 |

Fields not recorded include the AMD part's series, architecture, transistors, and launch MSRP. The Intel part's transistors and L3 cache total are also not recorded. Both parts share identical L1 cache sizes of 80 KB per core, both support ECC memory, both have locked multipliers, and both hold Active production status. The AMD part's L3 cache is recorded as 64 MB without a shared designation, while the Intel part's L3 is explicitly listed as 20 MB shared.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 64 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14400 has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus. The Intel Core i5-14400 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 was released on 2026-05-19. The Intel Core i5-14400 was released on 2024-01-07.

Q: What are the TDP values for the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has a TDP of 55 W. The Intel Core i5-14400 has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 includes a Radeon 8050S. The Intel Core i5-14400 includes UHD Graphics 730.

The Verdict

The database presents a challenging comparison because the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i5-14400 has a complete benchmark suite. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 32,115 and percentile of 82 place it firmly in the upper range of recorded CPUs, with nearest rivals within a 0.3 percent delta. The AMD part's average score of 0 and percentile of 50 reflect the absence of measurements rather than actual performance.

From a specification standpoint, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 offers more cores, more threads, a larger L3 cache, higher clock speeds, a more advanced process node, and significantly higher memory bandwidth. These characteristics suggest strong potential for heavily threaded workloads and memory-bandwidth-sensitive applications. The Intel Core i5-14400 offers PCIe Gen 5 support, broader memory compatibility with both DDR4 and DDR5, a slightly larger per-core L2 cache, and a lower release date by over two years. Its measured benchmark scores confirm solid real-world performance across a range of tests.

The market segments differ fundamentally: the AMD part targets mobile platforms with a 55 W TDP and Socket FP11, while the Intel part targets desktop platforms with a 65 W TDP and Socket 1700. Users selecting between these parts must consider their platform requirements first. The data does not support a performance verdict because the AMD part lacks benchmark measurements. The Intel part's recorded scores provide confidence in its capabilities, but the AMD part's architectural specifications indicate it could be competitive or superior in certain workloads, particularly those leveraging its 24 threads, 64 MB L3 cache, and 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth. Without head-to-head data, the verdict remains open: the Intel part is the measured performer, while the AMD part is the unquantified challenger with compelling specifications.