AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 does not include any benchmark scores, so a direct comparison with the Intel Core 7 240H must rely solely on the Intel chip’s measured performance and its position in the database. The Intel Core 7 240H has an average benchmark score of 31,483, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 scores 31,473 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31,508 (-0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 31,510 (-0.1% delta). This indicates that the Core 7 240H is statistically indistinguishable from those four chips, all within a 0.1% performance band.

The Intel Core 7 240H’s Cinebench results provide a clear picture of its multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 2,360; in R20 multi-core, 8,562; and in R23 multi-core, 15,764. Single-core scores are 249 (R15), 1,208 (R20), and 1,719 (R23). PassMark tests further detail its behavior: integer math scores 80,396, floating point math scores 58,905, and extended instructions score 16,897. Data compression hits 271,774, while data encryption is notably lower at 15,155. The multithread score is 23,975, and single-thread score is 3,782. Find prime numbers scores 102, physics scores 1,723, and random string sorting scores 28,866.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has no recorded benchmark scores, no wins can be attributed to it in this head-to-head. The Intel Core 7 240H is the only chip with measurable data, and its percentile rank of 82 confirms it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database, though its nearest rivals show it is not a class leader. The AMD chip’s absence of data means the comparison is asymmetric: the Intel part has a verified performance profile, while the AMD part’s capabilities remain unquantified in the database.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Core 7 240H is the only chip with benchmark evidence. It sits at the 82nd percentile, with an average score of 31,483, and its nearest rivals all fall within a 0.1% delta, meaning it competes directly with the Intel Core Ultra 3 205, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, and Intel Core i5-13500. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has no scores, so the database cannot confirm its performance level. Users who require verified multi-core and single-core results should rely on the Intel Core 7 240H, as its Cinebench and PassMark numbers are documented. The AMD chip may offer potential advantages in other areas, but without measured data, those remain speculative. The Intel part’s 10 cores, 16 threads, and 5.20 GHz boost clock are the only confirmed specifications tied to its performance. The AMD part’s 12 cores and 24 threads suggest it could handle more concurrent threads, but no benchmark confirms this. For any workload where measurable performance is the criterion, the Intel Core 7 240H is the only defensible choice from the recorded facts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5. Its process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size listed as 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 240H, in contrast, is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H from the Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. Its process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, with no die size recorded. The AMD chip’s cache hierarchy shows 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. The Intel chip also has 80 KB L1 per core but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core, while L3 is 24 MB shared. The AMD chip uses LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and 273.1 GB/s bandwidth, supports ECC, and uses AMD Socket FP11. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, no ECC, and uses Intel BGA 1744. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part has Radeon 8050S, while the Intel part has Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. PCIe support also diverges: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip’s production status is Active with a release date of 2026-05-19, while the Intel chip is also Active with a release date of 2024-12-17.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD chip runs at 3.20 GHz, the Intel chip at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks are closer: the AMD chip reaches 5.00 GHz, the Intel chip reaches 5.20 GHz. TDP differs, with the AMD chip at 55 and the Intel chip at 45. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP11, the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1744. The AMD chip is on a 4 nm TSMC process, the Intel chip on a 10 nm Intel process. Cache sizes differ in L2 and L3: the AMD chip has 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB L3, while the Intel chip has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB L3. Memory support, bus width, bandwidth, ECC, and PCIe lanes all differ as detailed above. The integrated graphics are different models. The AMD chip has a part number of 100-000002141, while the Intel chip has a part number of SRQ6TQ5ML. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD chip’s release date is 2026-05-19, the Intel chip’s is 2024-12-17.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Core 7 240H boosts to 5.20 GHz.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 240H does not.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 has 64 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 7 240H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 240H compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 240H has an average benchmark score of 31,483. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 (31,473, 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31,495, 0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31,508, -0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13500 (31,510, -0.1% delta).

Q: What memory types does each chip support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 supports LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core 7 240H supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 240H wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its benchmark scores confirm strong multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23 (15,764) and R20 (8,562), as well as solid single-thread results (R23 single-core 1,719). PassMark tests show its strengths in data compression (271,774) and integer math (80,396), while its multithread score of 23,975 indicates high parallel workload throughput. The Intel chip’s 82nd percentile rank places it above the majority of CPUs, and its nearest rivals demonstrate it is competitive with mid-range desktop and mobile parts. Its L2 cache of 2 MB per core is larger than the AMD chip’s 1 MB per core, which may benefit workloads with high data reuse. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 8 lanes offers newer connectivity than the AMD chip’s PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, though the lane count is lower.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 wins in specification-based advantages that lack benchmark confirmation. It has more cores (12 vs. 10) and more threads (24 vs. 16), which could provide an edge in heavily threaded tasks if its performance scales accordingly. Its L3 cache is significantly larger at 64 MB versus 24 MB, which may improve hit rates in memory-intensive workloads. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s on a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus exceeds the Intel chip’s dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 setup, though the Intel chip’s bandwidth is not recorded. The AMD chip’s ECC support is an advantage for error-sensitive computing environments. Its 4 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than the Intel chip’s 10 nm node, potentially improving power efficiency, though TDP is higher (55 vs. 45). The AMD chip’s Radeon 8050S integrated graphics may outperform the Intel chip’s Iris Xe Graphics 64EU, but no graphics benchmark data exists to confirm this. The AMD chip’s release date of 2026-05-19 is later than the Intel chip’s 2024-12-17, indicating a newer design. For users prioritizing verified performance, the Intel Core 7 240H is the only chip with measurable results. For users prioritizing core count, cache size, memory bandwidth, ECC support, and process node, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 490 offers a compelling specification sheet, but its actual performance remains unquantified in the database.