AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 and Intel Core 7 253PTE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the benchmark data reflects that split. The AMD part, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor, dominates the majority of recorded tests, while the Intel chip, a 10-core Bartlett Lake desktop part, claims a single but significant victory in one single-threaded workload. The database shows the AMD processor winning 14 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, with an average benchmark score of 63765 against the Intel part's 34962. The Intel processor holds a higher percentile rank for single-core performance in one test, but the AMD processor's overall percentile of 93 versus 84 indicates a broader performance lead across the tested suite.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 establishes its dominance in heavily threaded and compute-intensive workloads. In the Cinebench R15 multicore test, it scores 3918 against the Intel Core 7 253PTE's 2144, a margin of 82.7 percent. The Cinebench R23 multicore result shows a smaller but still decisive lead, 24828 versus 21276, a 16.7 percent advantage. PassMark's multithread test reinforces this pattern, with the AMD part scoring 42912 compared to 25031, a 71.4 percent difference. The AMD processor also excels in data compression, scoring 506170 versus 275828, a 83.5 percent lead, and in data encryption, where it records 26027 against 15500, a 67.9 percent advantage. The physics test shows an even larger gap, 2773 versus 1318, a 110.4 percent difference, and the extended instructions test shows the AMD part at 40888 versus 17099, a 139.1 percent lead. Prime number finding shows the most extreme disparity, 323 versus 82, a 293.9 percent margin. These results indicate the AMD processor is the clear choice for rendering, scientific computing, and any workload that scales with core count and memory bandwidth.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins one notable test: Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3003 against the AMD part's 1976, a 34.2 percent advantage. This is a substantial margin in a single-threaded rendering workload, suggesting that the Intel architecture, with its higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz, has an edge in tasks that rely on a single core's peak performance. In the Cinebench R15 single-core test, the two are nearly tied, with the AMD part at 303 and the Intel at 302, a 0.3 percent difference. The PassMark single-thread test also favors the AMD part, 3967 versus 3794, a 4.6 percent lead. The Intel processor also records a higher score in the Cinebench R20 tests, 8935 multicore and 1261 single-core, though the AMD part does not have corresponding R20 results in the database for direct comparison. The Intel part's wins are therefore concentrated in one specific benchmark, while the AMD part's wins span a wider range of workloads.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the superior processor for the vast majority of benchmark scenarios. It wins 14 of 15 head-to-head comparisons, and its average benchmark score of 63765 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 253PTE, with an average score of 34962, sits in the 84th percentile. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900KS with an average score of 64051 and a delta of -0.4 percent, and the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 with a delta of -0.7 percent, indicating that the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 performs at a level comparable to high-end desktop and server parts. The Intel Core 7 253PTE's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i7-13800H at 34988 and the Intel Core i9-12900HX at 35003, both with deltas of -0.1 percent, show that it is competitive with previous-generation mobile H-series parts.

For workloads that demand multi-core performance, the AMD processor is the clear winner. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with 64 MB of shared L3 cache and quad-channel memory support, deliver results that the Intel part cannot match. The Intel processor, with 10 cores and 20 threads, a 33 MB L3 cache, and dual-channel memory, is better suited for scenarios where single-threaded performance is the primary concern, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core win. The Intel part also holds a higher boost clock, 5.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, which likely contributes to that result. The AMD part's lower TDP of 55 watts against Intel's 45 watts suggests a higher power envelope, but the performance gains across the benchmark suite are substantial. The choice depends on the workload: multi-threaded tasks favor AMD, while a narrow set of single-threaded tasks favors Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 323 versus the Intel Core 7 253PTE's 82, a 293.9 percent difference. This test is highly sensitive to integer arithmetic and memory latency, and the AMD part's advantage is dramatic. The extended instructions test shows the second-largest gap, 40888 versus 17099, a 139.1 percent lead, indicating a strong advantage in SIMD and specialized instruction workloads. The physics test follows with 2773 versus 1318, a 110.4 percent margin, and the random string sorting test shows 55248 versus 28227, a 95.7 percent lead. The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows 3918 versus 2144, an 82.7 percent margin, and the data compression test shows 506170 versus 275828, an 83.5 percent lead. These results confirm the AMD part's dominance in both synthetic and application-based benchmarks.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE's only head-to-head win is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3003 against 1976, a 34.2 percent advantage. This is a notable result because it shows that the Intel part can outperform the AMD part in a specific single-threaded scenario, despite the AMD part's higher score in the PassMark single-thread test. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock, 5.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz, which is the likely cause of this result. The Cinebench R15 single-core test is nearly a tie, 303 versus 302, a 0.3 percent difference, and the PassMark single-thread test favors the AMD part, 3967 versus 3794, a 4.6 percent lead. The Intel part's R20 scores, 8935 multicore and 1261 single-core, are recorded in the database but have no AMD counterpart for comparison. The overall pattern is clear: the AMD part wins by wide margins in multi-threaded and specialized workloads, while the Intel part wins by a wide margin in one single-threaded workload and ties in another.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an average benchmark score of 63765, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE has an average score of 34962.

Q: In which test does the Intel Core 7 253PTE outperform the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE wins the Cinebench R23 single-core test, scoring 3003 against the AMD part's 1976, a 34.2 percent advantage.

Q: What is the largest performance difference between the two processors?

A: The largest difference is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 323 versus the Intel Core 7 253PTE's 82, a 293.9 percent lead.

Q: How do the two processors compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports quad-channel memory with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE supports dual-channel memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 253PTE has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It uses 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 8050S. The processor supports LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The socket is AMD Socket FP11, and the production status is active with a release date of 2025-01-05.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. It uses 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 730. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the production status is active with a release date of 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP is $384.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE has 10 cores and 20 threads. The base clock differs significantly, with the AMD part at 3.20 GHz and the Intel part at 1.80 GHz. The boost clock is higher on the Intel part, 5.40 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. The TDP also differs, with the AMD part at 55 watts and the Intel part at 45 watts. The L2 cache is larger on the Intel part, 2 MB per core versus 1 MB per core, while the L3 cache is larger on the AMD part, 64 MB shared versus 33 MB shared. The memory support differs, with the AMD part using LPDDR5X and the Intel part using DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is quad-channel on the AMD part and dual-channel on the Intel part, resulting in a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 on the AMD part and Gen 5 on the Intel part, both with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using the Radeon 8050S and the Intel part using the UHD Graphics 730. The process node is 4 nm for the AMD part and 10 nm for the Intel part. The sockets differ, with the AMD part using AMD Socket FP11 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700. The market segments also differ, with the AMD part classified as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop.