AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE, though direct head-to-head benchmark results are absent from the database. The AMD processor holds an average benchmark score of 56,273 across all tested workloads, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401TE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and sits in the 50th percentile, indicating a median-level performer with no measurable data to compare directly.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, the strongest multi-threaded results come from Cinebench. It scores 36,064 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 15,146 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3,635 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core results are similarly robust: 5,091 in Cinebench R23, 2,138 in Cinebench R20, and 513 in Cinebench R15. These figures place the Ryzen AI Max 390 in direct competition with processors like the Intel Core i9-14900HX, which posts an average score of 56,004, a 0.5% delta below the AMD chip. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 sits 0.1% ahead at 56,306, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX leads by 0.5% at 56,555. The Intel Core 7 253PQE trails by 0.6% at 55,919.

PassMark results for the AMD chip reinforce its standing. Multi-thread performance reaches 41,737, single-thread scores hit 4,028, integer math scores 146,519, and floating-point math 90,594. Data compression scores 487,145, data encryption 25,097, extended instructions 38,716, prime number finding 316, physics 2,761, and random string sorting 53,113. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in both throughput and latency-sensitive tasks, with the 91st percentile ranking confirming its position among high-end desktop and mobile parts.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark entries, so no exact scores can be cited for comparison. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs near the median of all CPUs, but the absence of data means quantitative head-to-head wins cannot be established from the database. The AMD chip's average score of 56,273 versus the Intel chip's average of 0 (due to missing data) creates an incomplete picture, yet the percentile gap of 41 points is stark.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Strix Halo codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The die consists of two chiplets at 70.6 mm² each, totaling roughly 141.2 mm² of silicon. It has 12 cores and 24 threads, with base and boost clocks of 3.20 GHz and 5.00 GHz respectively. The thermal design power is 55 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket FP11, a mobile platform. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, a substantial pool for multi-threaded workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture on the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size is 215 mm², a monolithic design. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with base and boost clocks of 2.00 GHz and 4.50 GHz. The thermal design power is 45 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The cache arrangement provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which is smaller than the AMD chip's 64 MB L3.

Memory support differs sharply. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 uses LPDDR5X with a quad-channel memory bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, and the database records no bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory, which suits workstation and server-adjacent use cases. PCIe connectivity also diverges: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving Intel a newer interconnect standard despite its older process node.

Integrated graphics further separate the two. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 pairs with a Radeon 8050S GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets mobile devices per its market segment, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. Release dates show the AMD chip launched on January 5, 2025, and the Intel chip on June 30, 2024, making the Intel part roughly six months older. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 wins outright in every measurable category due to its superior specifications and recorded performance. Its 12 cores and 24 threads double the Intel chip's 6 cores and 12 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,064 and PassMark multi-thread score of 41,737 indicate strong scaling across parallel tasks. The 64 MB L3 cache provides ample room for data reuse, and the quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 256.0 GB/s bandwidth minimizes bottlenecks in memory-intensive operations.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE, despite having no benchmark scores, holds advantages in specific architectural areas. Its 10 nm process is older than AMD's 4 nm node, but the larger die size of 215 mm² allows for a different design trade-off. The 1.25 MB L2 cache per core exceeds the AMD chip's 1 MB per core, which can benefit latency-sensitive single-threaded tasks that fit within L2. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes offers double the bandwidth of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4, which matters for high-speed storage or discrete GPUs on a desktop platform. The lower 45-watt TDP, compared to 55 watts for the AMD part, may appeal to power-constrained desktop builds, though the AMD chip's higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz suggests faster peak single-core potential.

The AMD chip's 91st percentile ranking versus the Intel chip's 50th percentile is the clearest indicator of overall superiority. The nearest rivals to the AMD chip, all within a 0.6% delta, are high-end parts like the Intel Core i9-14900HX and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no nearest rivals listed, which means it lacks a comparable performance cluster in the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 compare to the Intel Core i5-14401TE in core count?

A: The AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part doubles both core and thread counts.

Q: What is the cache configuration difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 has 80 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, plus 64 MB shared L3. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 per core, plus 20 MB shared L3. The AMD chip offers more L3 cache, while the Intel chip has slightly more L2 per core.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE boosts to 4.50 GHz. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock at 3.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 supports LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: How do their integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 includes a Radeon 8050S GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. The Radeon part is designed for mobile devices, and the UHD part targets desktop systems.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE sits in the 50th percentile. This places the AMD chip among high-end performers and the Intel chip near the median.

The Verdict

The data in the database points to a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is the dominant processor in this comparison. Its 91st percentile ranking, average benchmark score of 56,273, and extensive recorded results across Cinebench and PassMark demonstrate high-end performance. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration, 64 MB L3 cache, quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 256.0 GB/s, and 5.00 GHz boost clock all contribute to a processor that competes with parts like the Intel Core i9-14900HX and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, both within a 0.6% delta in average score.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE, with no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot match the AMD chip in measured performance. Its strengths lie in architectural specifics: PCIe Gen 5 support, a lower 45-watt TDP, and a desktop socket that suits traditional builds. The larger L2 cache per core and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support may appeal to specific use cases, but the lack of recorded data leaves its actual performance unverified.

For anyone selecting between these two parts, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is the choice for multi-threaded workloads, high-bandwidth memory tasks, and any application that benefits from a large L3 cache and strong single-core speed. The Intel Core i5-14401TE is viable for desktop systems requiring PCIe Gen 5 connectivity and lower power consumption, but its median percentile ranking and absent benchmark data make it a less compelling option for performance-sensitive buyers. The database shows no benchmark wins for the Intel chip, and the AMD chip's 41-point percentile lead is decisive.