CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

CORE STATE Strix Halo

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 55W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

Intel

INTEL

Xeon E-2436

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,579

1,853

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

222

261

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

6,583

7,723

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

929

1,090

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

15,674

18,389

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,212

2,596

passmark_data_compression

406,505

246,902

passmark_data_encryption

19,926

13,920

passmark_extended_instructions

33,873

16,334

passmark_find_prime_numbers

165

passmark_floating_point_math

71,105

50,198

passmark_integer_math

107,046

67,082

passmark_multithread

33,705

21,708

passmark_physics

1,889

1,353

passmark_random_string_sorting

43,725

28,363

passmark_single_thread

4,060

3,575

passmark_singlethread

4,060

3,575

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Intel Xeon E-2436

This comparison between Intel E-2436 processor and AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by AMD shows surprisingly similar results. These options achieve equivalent numbers across typical benchmarks, rendering this decision mainly contingent on price. The test figures supports this assessment. No chip has a decisive superiority. Buyers might pick based on secondary elements.

Over focusing on marginal benchmark deltas, prospective consumers might evaluate additional elements. Power efficiency, noise levels, ecosystem expenses, and capabilities typically count larger than slight processing gains. Such considerations could sway the balance. Think completely. The complete view plays a role.

Overall, the comparison between Intel E-2436 processor and AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 by AMD results in a near tie. Performance gaps are minimal and improbable to affect practical usage. Direct your selection on price, ecosystem preferences, and specific capability needs. Both are strong options. This parity is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

AI Max 385

E-2436

Core Specs

Cores

6 -25.0%

Threads

12 -25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.9 -19.4%

Boost Clock (GHz)

5 0.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.9 -19.4%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

5 0.0%

Multiplier

29 -19.4%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

65 +18.2%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

148 W

Configurable TDP

45-120 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Strix Halo

Raptor Lake-S

Generation

Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo))

Xeon E (Raptor Lake)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

LPDDR5X

DDR5

Memory Bus

Quad-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

256.0 GB/s

76.8 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket FP11

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel C266, C262

PCIe

Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AI/NPU

NPU

Yes / 50 TOPS

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

Radeon 8050S

—

Other

Market

Mobile

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

—

$331

Part Number

100-000001424

SRMXB

Package

FC-BGA

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

100°C

Bundled Cooler

—

Intel DVA-B

View Ryzen AI Max 385 Details View Xeon E-2436 Details