AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 versus the Intel Processor 300T. However, the AMD processor has a full set of measured scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark results in the database. This absence of data for the Intel side means a direct score-by-score comparison is impossible from the available measurements.

What the data does show is where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 stands in absolute terms. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score reaches 19095 points, with a single-core result of 2054 points. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 3234 and single-core is 313. Passmark results include a multithread score of 36402, a single-thread score of 4050, integer math at 127573, floating point math at 80023, data compression at 461195, data encryption at 22929, extended instructions at 32803, find prime numbers at 136, physics at 1915, and random string sorting at 48824.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 56306, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 with an average score of 56273, a delta of 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555, putting the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i9-14900HX scores 56004, which is 0.5% behind the AMD part, and the Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, trailing by 0.7%. These deltas are small, indicating the AMD processor sits in a tightly competitive band near the top of the database, but the Intel Processor 300T has no comparable scores to place alongside them.

Because the head-to-head array is empty and the Intel processor lacks any benchmark entries, the data cannot support a win count for either side. The AMD processor's scores are recorded, but no rival measurements exist for the Intel Processor 300T to compare against. The database therefore provides no evidence of a direct performance gap, only the AMD processor's standalone results.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is a high-performance mobile processor with extensive benchmark coverage, while the Intel Processor 300T is a desktop part with no recorded measurements. From the available information, the AMD processor achieves a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 56306. The Intel Processor 300T holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of any recorded tests.

For users selecting between these two, the database suggests that the AMD processor is the only one with quantifiable performance data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19095 and Passmark multithread score of 36402 indicate strong multi-threaded capability, while the single-thread score of 4050 in Passmark shows competent single-core performance. The Intel Processor 300T, with no scores in the database, cannot be positioned relative to these results.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its average score, which places it among high-end desktop and mobile parts like the Intel Core i9-14900HX. The Intel Processor 300T's 50th percentile ranking, based on no data, suggests it sits in the middle of the database, but this is an artifact of the missing benchmarks rather than a measured outcome. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 delivers recorded high-tier performance, while the Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark record to analyze.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 has an average benchmark score of 56306.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor 300T, and its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 has an average score of 56273, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470's 56306.

Q: What percentile ranking does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 hold?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 ranks in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the Cinebench R23 multicore score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 19095.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The launch MSRP is $82.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 and Intel Processor 300T differ across nearly every core specification field. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock for the AMD part is 2.00 GHz, whereas the Intel part runs at 3.40 GHz. The AMD processor has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz; the Intel processor has no recorded boost clock. Thermal design power differs as well: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, the Intel processor at 35 watts.

The socket types are not compatible: the AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor's process node is 4 nm with TSMC as the foundry, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel. Die size also differs, with the AMD processor at 233 mm² and the Intel processor at 163 mm².

Cache configurations diverge significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. L3 cache differs more substantially: the AMD processor has 16 MB, and the Intel processor has 6 MB shared. Memory support shows the AMD processor supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no recorded memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported on the AMD processor but not on the Intel processor. PCIe generations differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are also different, with the AMD processor featuring a Radeon 890M and the Intel processor featuring UHD Graphics 710.

Market segments and release dates differ as well. The AMD processor is a mobile part released on 2026-01-04, while the Intel processor is a desktop part released on 2024-01-07. The AMD processor has a part number of 100-000001937, and the Intel processor has a part number of SRN3K. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-S, from the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation.

The AMD processor is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel. This process difference contributes to the AMD processor's higher core count of 12 cores versus the Intel processor's 2 cores, despite the AMD part having a lower base clock. The AMD processor's boost clock of 5.20 GHz is notably higher than the Intel processor's absent boost clock specification.

Cache architecture reflects the different designs. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3, while the Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD processor's larger L3 cache aligns with its higher thread count. The Intel processor's smaller L3 is consistent with its dual-core design.

The AMD processor supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC support. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, no recorded bandwidth, and no ECC support. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes, giving the Intel part a newer PCIe generation despite its older architecture.

The AMD processor's integrated graphics is the Radeon 890M, which is a higher-tier integrated GPU compared to the Intel processor's UHD Graphics 710. The production status for both is active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is the only processor with measured performance wins. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19095 and Passmark multithread score of 36402 indicate strong multi-threaded workloads, while its single-thread Passmark score of 4050 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2054 show capable single-core performance. The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 56306 and 92nd percentile ranking place it well above the Intel Processor 300T's 50th percentile, though the Intel part has no scores to substantiate that ranking.

The Intel Processor 300T cannot claim any benchmark wins from the database because no measurements exist for it. Its specifications, such as a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz and PCIe Gen 5 support, are recorded, but these are not benchmark results. The AMD processor's 12 cores and 24 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded scenarios, and its 16 MB of L3 cache supports data-intensive tasks. The Intel processor's 2 cores and 4 threads limit its multi-threaded capacity, but its higher base clock could favor lightly threaded workloads, though no data confirms this.

The AMD processor's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support make it suited for memory-sensitive applications, while the Intel processor's DDR4 and DDR5 support without ECC offers less flexibility. The AMD processor's 4 nm process and Zen 5 architecture indicate a newer design, while the Intel processor's 10 nm Raptor Lake architecture is older. For use cases, the AMD processor appears positioned for mobile high-performance computing, while the Intel processor targets desktop entry-level tasks, but the data cannot quantify the Intel part's actual performance in any scenario.