AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,234
3,540
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
313
499
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
19,095
35,122
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,054
4,958
passmark_data_compression
461,195
505,885
passmark_data_encryption
22,929
30,144
passmark_extended_instructions
32,803
28,564
passmark_find_prime_numbers
136
176
passmark_floating_point_math
80,023
107,005
passmark_integer_math
127,573
155,808
passmark_multithread
36,402
41,317
passmark_physics
1,915
2,455
passmark_random_string_sorting
48,824
55,918
passmark_single_thread
4,050
4,257
passmark_singlethread
4,050
4,257
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
14,751
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,082
geekbench_multicore
N/A
19,620
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,429

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 vs Intel Core i7-14700F

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 and the Intel Core i7-14700F represent two fundamentally different approaches to computing, one designed for mobile efficiency and the other for desktop throughput. The recorded data shows a clear split: the Intel part dominates the vast majority of benchmark comparisons, winning 14 of the 15 head-to-head tests. However, the AMD chip is not without its own distinct advantages, particularly in specific instruction-heavy workloads and as a highly efficient mobile platform. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results to determine where each processor excels.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data paints a decisive picture for multi-core and single-core performance. The Intel Core i7-14700F is the clear winner in almost every category that stresses raw computational power. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it posts a score of 35122 against the AMD's 19095, a significant 45.6% lead. This trend continues across various PassMark tests, including integer math (155808 vs 127573, an 18.1% lead), floating-point math (107005 vs 80023, a 25.2% lead), and data encryption (30144 vs 22929, a 23.9% lead). The Intel CPU also wins in single-core performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958, which is 58.6% higher than the AMD's 2054. For users whose workloads rely on standard CPU processing, rendering, and general productivity, the data consistently points to Intel.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 has a single, clear win in the head-to-head benchmarks: the PassMark extended instructions test. Here, it scores 32803, outperforming the Intel's 28564 by a substantial 14.8%. This is a specific workload test that often measures the efficiency of new and specialized instruction sets, indicating the Zen 5 architecture has a particular strength in this area. This is its only win in the recorded data, but it is a notable one, suggesting an advantage in specific niche applications that can leverage these instructions. Beyond that, the AMD processor's main advantage is its platform rather than its raw benchmark scores. As a mobile chip with a 28W TDP and integrated Radeon 890M graphics, it wins on the platform level for a portable, self-contained system.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on entirely different architectures and for different market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is a mobile processor using the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point) and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is designed for the AMD Socket FP8 and has a 28W TDP. The cache configuration is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, and it includes integrated Radeon 890M graphics, making it a complete system-on-chip for laptops. Its PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

In contrast, the Intel Core i7-14700F is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R). It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and is built for the Intel Socket 1700. It has significantly more cores, with 20 cores and 28 threads, and a higher base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its TDP is 65W. The cache hierarchy is different: it has 80 KB of L1 per core, a larger 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has no integrated graphics, hence the "F" suffix. Its PCIe interface is the newer Gen 5 standard with 16 lanes. The die size is also different, with the AMD at 233 mm² and the Intel at 257 mm².

The data shows the Intel chip has a core and thread advantage, which is expected given its desktop nature. The AMD, however, is a 4 nm part with a lower TDP, indicating it is designed for power efficiency and mobile integration. The Intel part, with its larger L3 cache and higher clocks, is built for maximum performance, relying on a discrete graphics card for display output.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded benchmark data, the choice between these two processors is dictated by the user's hardware needs. The Intel Core i7-14700F is the overwhelming performance winner. It is the superior processor for any task that benefits from raw CPU power, including 3D rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations. Its lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core by 45.6% is substantial, and it also takes the single-core crown by 58.6%. If a user is building a desktop PC and wants the highest level of CPU performance in the database's benchmark suite, the Intel part is the clear pick.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is the winner for a different set of criteria. It is a mobile processor, as indicated by its Socket FP8 and 28W TDP. For a laptop, this is the more relevant option. While it loses in raw performance, it offers a complete package with integrated Radeon 890M graphics, making it a capable solution for a thin-and-light laptop without a discrete GPU. Its single benchmark win in extended instructions shows it can be faster for specific, optimized compute tasks. The data suggests it is not a competitor to the Intel desktop part, but a powerful alternative for a portable system.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F. It leads in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test with a score of 35122, which is 45.6% higher than the AMD's score of 19095.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 have any advantages?

A: Yes, the AMD part wins the Passmark extended instructions test with a score of 32803, which is 14.8% higher than the Intel's 28564. It also has integrated graphics and is a mobile processor.

Q: What is the difference in their core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The record shows "multiplierUnlocked" is false for both.

Q: Which processor is from the newer generation?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is based on the Zen 5 architecture (Gorgon Point), while the Intel Core i7-14700F is based on Raptor Lake Refresh.

Q: What are the TDPs of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 has a TDP of 28W, and the Intel Core i7-14700F has a TDP of 65W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data is overwhelmingly in the Intel's favor, but the margins vary. The biggest win for Intel is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 4958, a 58.6% advantage over the AMD's 2054. The next largest is in the multi-core test of the same suite, where the Intel leads by 45.6% (35122 vs 19095). These are the most significant gaps.

Another large gap is in the Cinebench R15 single-core test, with Intel leading by 37.3% (499 vs 313). The Intel also enjoys a 25.2% lead in Passmark floating point math (107005 vs 80023) and a 23.9% lead in data encryption (30144 vs 22929). In Passmark find prime numbers, the Intel wins by 22.7% (176 vs 136). The Intel's smallest win is in single-thread tests, with a 4.9% advantage (4257 vs 4050), which is still a win.

The AMD's only victory is in Passmark extended instructions, where it scores 32803, beating the Intel's 28564 by 14.8%. This shows a specific strength in that workload. Despite the Intel's dominance, the AMD's win in this one test is a reminder that the newer architecture has its own unique capabilities. The data shows the Intel is a high-performance desktop chip, while the AMD has a specific instruction advantage and is a low-power mobile chip. The overall benchmark scores reflect this, with the Intel having a higher average score of 53620, ranking in the 91st percentile, while the AMD is in the 92nd percentile with an average score of 56306.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 HX PRO 470
i7-14700F
Core Specs
Cores
12
20 +66.7%
Threads
24
28 +16.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Multiplier
20
21 +5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
1500 MHz up to 4.2 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 55 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$359
Part Number
100-000001937
SRN3Z
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
Laminar RM1
View Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 Details View Core i7-14700F Details