AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 vs Intel Core i7-13700K Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 and Intel Core i7-13700K are both 24-thread processors that land in the same performance tier, but they achieve parity through radically different designs. The data shows the AMD part is a mobile-first chip that wins decisively in one specific Cinebench single-core test, while the Intel part is a desktop powerhouse that dominates nearly every other benchmark. The i7-13700K is the clear choice for sustained multi-threaded workloads and general productivity, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is the pick for ultra-portable systems where its 28W TDP and integrated Radeon 890M graphics make it a compelling package. The overall benchmark averages are nearly identical — 47022 for AMD versus 46881 for Intel, a 0.3% gap — but the distribution of wins is lopsided: Intel takes 15 of 17 head-to-head tests.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-13700K is the superior processor for anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput. It wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, with particularly large margins in multi-core workloads like Cinebench R15 multi-core (4507.5 vs 2875, a 36.2% advantage) and PassMark multi-thread (45887 vs 33689, 26.6% ahead). Its 16 cores, 30MB of shared L3 cache, and 5.40 GHz boost clock give it a decisive edge in rendering, compression, and physics simulations. The data also shows it leads in single-threaded PassMark (4333 vs 3914, 9.7% ahead), making it the better all-rounder for everyday responsiveness.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is not without merit, but its wins are narrow and specific. It takes Cinebench R15 single-core (405 vs 303, 33.7% ahead) and Cinebench R23 single-core (4027 vs 2116, a massive 90.3% advantage). These results suggest the Zen 5 architecture has exceptional single-thread efficiency, but the overall benchmark averages tell the real story: the two chips are statistically tied, with AMD at 47022 and Intel at 46881. The Ryzen's 28W TDP versus Intel's 125W TDP means it delivers comparable average performance at a fraction of the power draw, making it the logical choice for thin-and-light laptops where battery life and thermals are paramount. For desktop users with adequate cooling, the i7-13700K is the straightforward recommendation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite ends of the design spectrum. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4nm TSMC process, built on the Strix Point codename with a 233 mm² die. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads in a hybrid configuration (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) with a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. It supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it includes ECC memory support. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics is a significant feature for a mobile part, and the chip uses AMD Socket FP8 with PCIe Gen 4 (16 lanes CPU-only).

Intel's Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10nm process, with a slightly larger 257 mm² die. It has 16 cores and 24 threads (the classic Raptor Lake hybrid of performance and efficiency cores), with a 3.40 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost. The cache setup is more generous: 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with ECC support. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but less capable than AMD's Radeon 890M. Intel uses Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU-only), and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking — a feature absent on the AMD part.

The process node difference is stark: 4nm TSMC versus 10nm Intel. This explains the power disparity — 28W TDP for AMD versus 125W for Intel — and why the Ryzen can achieve comparable average scores while consuming far less energy. The AMD part is also newer, with a release date of 2025-01-05 versus Intel's 2022-09-26, and it targets the mobile segment while Intel targets desktop.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher overall average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has an average benchmark score of 47022, while the Intel Core i7-13700K scores 46881. The difference is 0.3%, with AMD slightly ahead.

Q: Why does the AMD chip win Cinebench R23 single-core by such a large margin?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 4027 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus Intel's 2116, a 90.3% advantage. This reflects the Zen 5 architecture's strong single-thread efficiency, which is also visible in Cinebench R15 single-core (405 vs 303, 33.7% ahead).

Q: How does the Intel chip perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K leads in all multi-threaded Cinebench tests: R15 multi-core (4507.5 vs 2875, 36.2% ahead), R20 multi-core (16292 vs 11982, 26.5% ahead), and R23 multi-core (30745 vs 28529, 7.2% ahead). It also wins PassMark multi-thread (45887 vs 33689, 26.6% ahead).

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 has a TDP of 28W, while the Intel Core i7-13700K has a TDP of 125W. This makes the AMD part far more suitable for mobile devices.

Q: Which chip offers better integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 features Radeon 890M integrated graphics, while the Intel Core i7-13700K has UHD Graphics 770. The data does not include direct GPU benchmarks, but the Radeon 890M is positioned as a more capable integrated solution.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700K has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375's 5.10 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-13700K has 16 cores versus 12 for AMD, though both have 24 threads. Intel's base clock is 3.40 GHz compared to AMD's 2.00 GHz, and Intel's boost clock is 5.40 GHz versus 5.10 GHz. The TDP gap is substantial: 125W for Intel versus 28W for AMD. The process node differs (10nm Intel versus 4nm TSMC), as does the die size (257 mm² versus 233 mm²). Cache configurations diverge: Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 30 MB shared L3, while AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3. Memory support also differs: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The PCIe implementation is different (Gen 5 with 20 lanes for Intel versus Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD), and Intel's multiplier is unlocked while AMD's is not. The integrated GPUs are distinct (UHD Graphics 770 versus Radeon 890M), and the sockets are incompatible (Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket FP8). Intel has a launch MSRP of $409; AMD's launch MSRP is not listed. Intel's part number is SRMB8, while AMD's is 100-000001683.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of two very different performance profiles. Intel's Core i7-13700K wins the overwhelming majority of tests, starting with Cinebench R15 multi-core where it scores 4507.5 against AMD's 2875 — a 36.2% margin. The gap narrows in newer multi-core tests: R20 multi-core shows Intel ahead by 26.5% (16292 vs 11982), and R23 multi-core sees Intel leading by only 7.2% (30745 vs 28529). This trend suggests AMD's Zen 5 architecture scales better with newer instruction sets, though Intel still maintains the lead.

In single-core tests, the results are split. Intel wins PassMark single-thread (4333 vs 3914, 9.7% ahead), but AMD dominates Cinebench single-core. The R15 single-core test shows AMD at 405 versus Intel's 303, a 33.7% advantage. More strikingly, R23 single-core gives AMD a 90.3% lead (4027 vs 2116). This discrepancy between PassMark and Cinebench single-core results indicates the AMD chip excels in specific workloads while Intel holds a broader single-thread advantage.

The PassMark suite is uniformly favorable to Intel. Data compression shows Intel at 595292 versus AMD's 416331, a 30.1% lead. Data encryption goes to Intel by 36.3% (33249 vs 21186). Extended instructions favor Intel by 19.9% (36625 vs 29351), and find prime numbers shows Intel ahead by 34.6% (191 vs 125). Floating point math is 35% better on Intel (114867 vs 74626), integer math is 22.6% better (154446 vs 119521), and physics is 32.1% better (2716 vs 1843). Random string sorting sees Intel win by 27.6% (62670 vs 45358). The only non-Cinebench win for AMD is none — Intel sweeps the entire PassMark suite.

The aggregate picture is unambiguous: Intel wins 15 of 17 benchmarks, with AMD's only victories being the two Cinebench single-core tests. Despite this, the average benchmark scores are within 0.3% of each other (47022 for AMD, 46881 for Intel), and both chips sit at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Core i7-13700K itself (0.3% delta), while Intel's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (-0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX (0.5%). This suggests that while the i7-13700K dominates the head-to-head comparisons, the overall performance envelope is remarkably similar — proof of the efficiency of AMD's mobile design.