AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Intel Core i5-14600KF Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and Intel Core i5-14600KF represent two fundamentally different approaches to processing power: one is a mobile-first, power-sipping Zen 5 design, while the other is an unlocked desktop Raptor Lake part. Despite both landing in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, the benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, with the Intel part winning all 15 head-to-head comparisons. However, the AMD chip’s strengths lie not in raw speed, but in its feature set and platform efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant divide between the two processors appears in multi-core rendering workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 32,544, which is a commanding 43.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370’s 18,520. The gap narrows slightly in Cinebench R15 multi-core, but the Intel part still leads with 3,280 versus 3,178, a 3.1% advantage. This trend suggests that the Intel chip’s higher core count and power envelope translate directly into sustained throughput in heavily threaded tasks.

Single-core performance tells a similar, though more extreme, story. The Intel processor’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,594 dwarfs the AMD’s 1,992, resulting in a 56.6% deficit for the Ryzen chip. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the Intel part scores 462 against the AMD’s 309, a 33.1% lead. These results indicate that the Intel chip’s 5.30 GHz boost clock offers a substantial advantage in latency-sensitive, lightly-threaded applications.

Looking at PassMark’s suite, the Intel i5-14600KF maintains its lead across every metric, but the margins vary considerably. The closest contest is in extended instructions, where Intel’s 28,785 is only 2.2% ahead of AMD’s 28,165. Integer math also remains tight, with Intel’s 125,982 beating AMD’s 120,016 by 4.7%. These smaller deltas suggest that in specific algorithmic workloads, the Zen 5 architecture can narrow the gap, even if it cannot overcome Intel’s overall performance lead.

The largest PassMark deltas appear in data encryption, where Intel wins by 24.7% (27,608 vs 20,788), and floating-point math, where Intel leads by 21% (93,048 vs 73,493). Physics simulations show a 22.7% advantage for Intel (2,449 vs 1,892), while data compression sees Intel ahead by 16.9% (485,140 vs 403,113). Random string sorting follows with a 15.9% Intel lead (52,056 vs 43,767). The AMD chip is never ahead in any test, but its single-thread score of 4,003 against Intel’s 4,273 (a 6.3% gap) shows it is more competitive in that domain than in multi-core workloads.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark results, the Intel Core i5-14600KF wins in every tested category. There is no workload in the data where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 comes out ahead. The Intel part is the clear choice for users prioritizing raw performance in rendering, encryption, physics calculations, and general multithreaded tasks.

The AMD processor’s only qualitative advantages come from its platform specifications, not benchmark scores. It features integrated Radeon 890M graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely. This makes the AMD chip a viable option for systems that require a display output without a discrete GPU, whereas the Intel KF-series part requires an external graphics card. The AMD chip also has a 28 W TDP compared to Intel’s 125 W, making it far more suitable for compact or mobile designs, even if it sacrifices performance to achieve that efficiency.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two is stark. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF uses Intel’s 10 nm node. The AMD chip’s die is 233 mm², slightly smaller than Intel’s 257 mm². Both use an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but they diverge at L2: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache also differs, with AMD offering 16 MB total and Intel providing 24 MB shared.

Core and thread configurations are a key differentiator. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads. This means Intel has more physical cores, but AMD has more threads due to simultaneous multithreading on all its cores. The Intel chip runs at a 3.50 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost, while the AMD part is clocked at 2.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost.

Memory support also differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but its memory bandwidth is not listed in the data. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is a clear Intel advantage, as it offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD is limited to Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The AMD chip has a mobile socket (FP8) and an integrated GPU, while the Intel part uses Socket 1700 and has no integrated graphics. Intel’s multiplier is unlocked, whereas AMD’s is not.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 32,544, which is 43.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370’s 18,520.

Q: Is the AMD chip competitive in any benchmark?

A: The AMD chip is closest in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 28,165 versus Intel’s 28,785, a 2.2% gap. It is also within 4.7% in integer math.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD processor is limited to PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: Does either processor have integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 includes Radeon 890M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600KF has a launch MSRP of $294.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Intel Core i5-14600KF |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 14 |

| Threads | 24 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 125 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | None |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $294 |

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-14600KF is the superior processor in terms of raw benchmark performance. It wins every single head-to-head test, with leads ranging from 2.2% in extended instructions to a massive 56.6% in Cinebench R23 single-core. For any user whose primary concern is processing speed, whether in multi-threaded rendering or single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel part is the only choice based on these numbers.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, however, should not be dismissed. Its 28 W TDP, integrated Radeon 890M graphics, and mobile FP8 socket make it a purpose-built solution for laptops and compact systems where power draw and space are critical constraints. Its 90th percentile ranking and close performance in integer math and extended instructions show it is not a slouch, but it is clearly designed for efficiency rather than outright speed. Users who need a desktop processor with maximum performance should select the Intel Core i5-14600KF, while those building a power-conscious mobile system would find the AMD chip’s feature set more appropriate, accepting the significant performance trade-off.