AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Intel Core i5-14600K Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 or the Intel Core i5-14600K?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The AMD part offers more threads despite fewer cores.

Q: What is the difference in single-core performance between the two?

A: In Cinebench R15 single-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 309 versus 297 for the Intel Core i5-14600K, a 4% advantage for AMD. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel wins with 2064 against 1992, a 3.5% margin.

Q: Which processor wins the multi-core benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with 3640 against 3178 (12.7% higher), and Cinebench R23 multi-core with 24491 against 18520 (24.4% higher).

Q: How do the two compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has an average benchmark score of 50448, while the Intel Core i5-14600K sits at 48618. Both are in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has a TDP of 28 watts, whereas the Intel Core i5-14600K has a TDP of 125 watts. This reflects their different market segments.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe generations?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600K supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, using the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size measures 233 mm². In contrast, the Intel Core i5-14600K uses Intel's 10 nm process (Raptor Lake architecture, Raptor Lake-R codename) with a die size of 257 mm². The Intel chip is part of the Core 14th Gen series, specifically the Core i5 Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. However, the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. For L3 cache, AMD provides 16 MB total, whereas Intel provides 24 MB shared. These differences affect how quickly each CPU can access frequently used data.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory, offering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14600K supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

Market positioning diverges sharply. The AMD chip is a mobile processor using AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor features the Radeon 890M integrated graphics, whereas the Intel processor features UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip has a locked multiplier, while the Intel chip has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows 15 recorded tests, with Intel winning 14 and AMD winning 1. The single AMD victory comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 309 against 297, a 4% advantage. This is the only test where the AMD part leads.

Intel's biggest wins come in multi-core and encryption workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 24491 versus 18520, a 24.4% lead. Passmark data encryption shows Intel at 27533 versus 20788, a 24.5% margin. Passmark physics shows Intel at 2473 versus 1892, a 23.5% lead. Floating point math follows closely, with Intel at 92794 versus 73493, a 20.8% gap.

Moderate Intel wins appear in several other tests. Passmark find prime numbers shows Intel at 162 versus 131, a 19.1% lead. Passmark data compression shows Intel at 482020 versus 403113, a 16.4% margin. Passmark random string sorting shows Intel at 51949 versus 43767, a 15.8% lead. Passmark multithread shows Intel at 38682 versus 33349, a 13.8% advantage. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows Intel at 3640 versus 3178, a 12.7% lead.

Smaller Intel advantages appear in single-threaded and integer workloads. Passmark single thread shows Intel at 4270 versus 4003, a 6.3% lead. Passmark integer math shows Intel at 125737 versus 120016, a 4.5% margin. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 2064 versus 1992, a 3.5% lead. Passmark extended instructions shows Intel at 28546 versus 28165, a 1.3% margin.

The overall pattern is clear: Intel dominates in heavily multi-threaded and compute-intensive tasks, while AMD's single win is a narrow single-core result. The average benchmark scores reflect this split, with AMD at 50448 and Intel at 48618, though the head-to-head results favor Intel in most direct comparisons.

Comparing to their nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 sits within 1.1% of the Intel Core i9-14900T, 0.6% of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, and 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13980HX. The Intel Core i5-14600K sits within 0.8% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, 0.7% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX, 0.3% of the AMD EPYC 4345P, and 0.2% of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 | Intel Core i5-14600K |

|---------------|---------------------------|-----------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 14 |

| Threads | 24 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 125 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2023-10-16 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | 100-000001569 | SRN43 |

The Intel Core i5-14600K has a launch MSRP of $319. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data points to different buyers for each processor. The Intel Core i5-14600K wins 14 of 15 head-to-head tests, including all major multi-core workloads and most single-threaded results. Its advantages range from 1.3% in extended instructions to 24.5% in data encryption. For users prioritizing raw compute throughput, especially in rendering, physics, and encryption, the Intel part is the stronger choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 wins only Cinebench R15 single-core by 4%, but it offers higher thread count (24 versus 20) and dramatically lower power consumption (28 W versus 125 W). Its mobile design with an FP8 socket and Radeon 890M graphics positions it for portable systems where the Intel desktop chip cannot operate.

The average benchmark scores tell a different story: AMD at 50448 versus Intel at 48618. This suggests that across a broader set of workloads not covered in the head-to-head list, the AMD part holds its own. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13980HX with a delta of 0.1%, indicating performance parity with high-end mobile Intel parts.

For desktop builders with access to standard power delivery, the Intel Core i5-14600K is the clear performance winner. For mobile users or those building compact systems with strict thermal and power limits, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers competitive average performance with a fraction of the power draw.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600K wins in multi-core rendering, as shown by Cinebench R23 multi-core (24491 versus 18520) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (3640 versus 3178). It also leads in security and encryption tasks, with Passmark data encryption at 27533 versus 20788. Physics simulation strongly favors Intel, with Passmark physics at 2473 versus 1892. Floating point math, prime number finding, data compression, random string sorting, and integer math all go to Intel with margins between 4.5% and 20.8%. Single-threaded tasks also favor Intel in most cases, including Passmark single thread (4270 versus 4003) and Cinebench R23 single-core (2064 versus 1992).

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 wins in exactly one head-to-head test: Cinebench R15 single-core, scoring 309 versus 297. Beyond that, its strengths are structural rather than benchmark-based. It offers more threads (24 versus 20) despite fewer cores, which can help in heavily threaded workloads that scale with thread count. Its 28 W TDP allows deployment in systems where the Intel chip's 125 W TDP is impractical. The AMD part also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in mobile platforms, and its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provides a measurable advantage for memory-intensive mobile tasks. The integrated Radeon 890M likely outperforms UHD Graphics 770 in graphics workloads, though the database does not record specific graphics benchmarks for either part.

For users prioritizing extreme multi-core performance, encryption throughput, or physics calculations, the Intel Core i5-14600K is the data-backed pick. For users prioritizing mobile compatibility, power efficiency, or thread count, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 offers the relevant advantages, even if its direct benchmark wins are limited to a single test.